國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"安寧照護" ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

台灣安寧病房公共空間療癒性構成要素相對重要性之研究 = A Study ...

國立高雄大學創意設計與建築學系碩士班

台灣安寧病房公共空間療癒性構成要素相對重要性之研究 = A Study on the Optimal Selection for Designing Healing Components at the Hospice Public Space in Taiwan

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	A Study on the Optimal Selection for Designing Healing Components at the Hospice Public Space in Taiwan
作者:	洪詩涵,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2014[民103]
面頁冊數:	136面部份彩圖，表 : 30公分;
標題:	安寧照護
標題:	Hospice Palliative Care
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/08403370426000689390
附註:	含參考書目
附註:	103年12月16日公開
摘要註:	近年來，在台灣的安寧病房療癒環境營造，其療癒性構成因素的提出或許是來自醫護專業人員的長期體驗，或環境設計專業人員、建築師與室內設計師、以及環境心理專家的建議。在這些專家之間，基於各自的專業知識，對一些療癒性構成因素在設計時的相對重要性，可能存在某種認知的差異。因此，本研究是以在這些專家之間，對療癒性構成要素選用的優先性，進行認知差異的比較和分析。本文已藉由「專家及設計人員」的訪談及問卷調查模式，瞭解其對安寧病房公共空間的規劃設計觀點，特別是對公共空間中一些療癒環境構成要素的相對重要性的選擇趨勢。相關的成果摘要說明如下：1. 在評估準則部分，空氣品質與採光形式二者屬於相對非常重要的項目。自然景觀的連結也是重要的評估準則。2. 在總體的評估因子排序中，增加自然通風、增加開窗面積與消除空氣中的異味是在專家共識中最重要的三項因子。其次是眩光控制、設置植栽盆景以及設置景觀庭園。採用間接照明和設置自然水體也被認為是相對比較重要的選項。3. 專家學者與使用者在評估因子重要性排序的認知上有明顯的不同。專家學者重視採光形式；使用者則偏向空氣品質部分。4. 建築師認為「採光形式」部分的評估因子幾乎都是相對最重要；室內設計師則認為「空氣品質」的評估因子最重要。5. 療癒設計專家認為「附加性環境紓壓設施」的評估因子幾乎都是相對比較重要。6. 室內設計師與安寧照護師皆認為「自然景觀連結」的因子必須被重視。7. 健康環境專家與病患家屬同樣為「空氣品質」與「採光形式」的評估因子是相當重要的。 Recently the healing components for making the healing environment of the hospices in Taiwan have brought up mostly by the doctors and nurses based on their long-term experience, or suggested by the environmental designers, architects, interior designers or environmental psychology experts. As to the relative importance of some healing components in environmental design, probably cognitive difference exists among those experts due to their respective expertise. Accordingly, the priority to apply healing components was compared and analyzed for cognitive discrepancy among varied experts in this study.Through interview and questionnaire, the opinions of the experts and designers regarding the planning and design of the public space of the hospices were surveyed, especially the selection trend of the relative importance of some components of the healing environment. The relative findings were summarized as follows.1. Among the evaluation criteria, quality of air and type of daylighting were relatively important. Linking up natural landscapes was vital too.2. In the favored order of the evaluation factors, increase of natural ventilation, increase of opening area of window, and elimination of odors in the air were the three most essential factors induced by the consensus of the experts. The subsequent factors were glare control, establishment of miniascape as well as establishment of landscape garden. Indirect illumination and establishment of natural water resources were also regarded as fairly important selection.3. The priority of ordering evaluation factors between the experts and the users presented significant cognitive inconsistency. The experts valued the type of daylighting while the users quality of air.4. The architects regarded that greater part of the evaluation factors for type of daylighting were relatively very critical while the interior designers deemed that the evaluation factors for quality of air were most important.5. The experts for therapeutic design considered almost all the evaluation factors for added environmental-relieving facilities were more important.6. Both the interior designers and the hospice care givers thought that the factors for linking natural landscape ought to be valued.7. The healthy-environment experts and the family caregivers considered that the evaluation factors for quality of air and type of daylighting were greatly vital.

台灣安寧病房公共空間療癒性構成要素相對重要性之研究 = A Study on the Optimal Selection for Designing Healing Components at the Hospice Public Space in Taiwan
洪, 詩涵

台灣安寧病房公共空間療癒性構成要素相對重要性之研究 = A Study on the Optimal Selection for Designing Healing Components at the Hospice Public Space in Taiwan / 洪詩涵撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2014[民103]. - 136面 ; 部份彩圖，表 ; 30公分.
含參考書目103年12月16日公開.
安寧照護Hospice Palliative Care

台灣安寧病房公共空間療癒性構成要素相對重要性之研究 = A Study on the Optimal Selection for Designing Healing Components at the Hospice Public Space in Taiwan
LDR:05559nam0a2200289 450 001 430106
005 20170214092329.0
009 430106
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214d2014 k y0chiy05 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 台灣安寧病房公共空間療癒性構成要素相對重要性之研究 $d A Study on the Optimal Selection for Designing Healing Components at the Hospice Public Space in Taiwan $z eng $f 洪詩涵撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2014[民103]
215 0 $a 136面 $c 部份彩圖，表 $d 30公分
300 $a 含參考書目
300 $a 103年12月16日公開
314 $a 指導教授：劉安平博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學創意設計與建築學系碩士班
330 $a 近年來，在台灣的安寧病房療癒環境營造，其療癒性構成因素的提出或許是來自醫護專業人員的長期體驗，或環境設計專業人員、建築師與室內設計師、以及環境心理專家的建議。在這些專家之間，基於各自的專業知識，對一些療癒性構成因素在設計時的相對重要性，可能存在某種認知的差異。因此，本研究是以在這些專家之間，對療癒性構成要素選用的優先性，進行認知差異的比較和分析。本文已藉由「專家及設計人員」的訪談及問卷調查模式，瞭解其對安寧病房公共空間的規劃設計觀點，特別是對公共空間中一些療癒環境構成要素的相對重要性的選擇趨勢。相關的成果摘要說明如下：1. 在評估準則部分，空氣品質與採光形式二者屬於相對非常重要的項目。自然景觀的連結也是重要的評估準則。2. 在總體的評估因子排序中，增加自然通風、增加開窗面積與消除空氣中的異味是在專家共識中最重要的三項因子。其次是眩光控制、設置植栽盆景以及設置景觀庭園。採用間接照明和設置自然水體也被認為是相對比較重要的選項。3. 專家學者與使用者在評估因子重要性排序的認知上有明顯的不同。專家學者重視採光形式；使用者則偏向空氣品質部分。4. 建築師認為「採光形式」部分的評估因子幾乎都是相對最重要；室內設計師則認為「空氣品質」的評估因子最重要。5. 療癒設計專家認為「附加性環境紓壓設施」的評估因子幾乎都是相對比較重要。6. 室內設計師與安寧照護師皆認為「自然景觀連結」的因子必須被重視。7. 健康環境專家與病患家屬同樣為「空氣品質」與「採光形式」的評估因子是相當重要的。 Recently the healing components for making the healing environment of the hospices in Taiwan have brought up mostly by the doctors and nurses based on their long-term experience, or suggested by the environmental designers, architects, interior designers or environmental psychology experts. As to the relative importance of some healing components in environmental design, probably cognitive difference exists among those experts due to their respective expertise. Accordingly, the priority to apply healing components was compared and analyzed for cognitive discrepancy among varied experts in this study.Through interview and questionnaire, the opinions of the experts and designers regarding the planning and design of the public space of the hospices were surveyed, especially the selection trend of the relative importance of some components of the healing environment. The relative findings were summarized as follows.1. Among the evaluation criteria, quality of air and type of daylighting were relatively important. Linking up natural landscapes was vital too.2. In the favored order of the evaluation factors, increase of natural ventilation, increase of opening area of window, and elimination of odors in the air were the three most essential factors induced by the consensus of the experts. The subsequent factors were glare control, establishment of miniascape as well as establishment of landscape garden. Indirect illumination and establishment of natural water resources were also regarded as fairly important selection.3. The priority of ordering evaluation factors between the experts and the users presented significant cognitive inconsistency. The experts valued the type of daylighting while the users quality of air.4. The architects regarded that greater part of the evaluation factors for type of daylighting were relatively very critical while the interior designers deemed that the evaluation factors for quality of air were most important.5. The experts for therapeutic design considered almost all the evaluation factors for added environmental-relieving facilities were more important.6. Both the interior designers and the hospice care givers thought that the factors for linking natural landscape ought to be valued.7. The healthy-environment experts and the family caregivers considered that the evaluation factors for quality of air and type of daylighting were greatly vital.
510 1 $a A Study on the Optimal Selection for Designing Healing Components at the Hospice Public Space in Taiwan $z eng
610 0 $a 安寧照護 $a 安寧病房 $a 療癒環境 $a 療癒性構成因素
610 1 $a Hospice Palliative Care $a Hospice Nurses $a Healing Environment $a Healing Component
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 582204 3403 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 洪 $b 詩涵 $4 撰 $3 673333
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 創意設計與建築學系碩士班 $3 592867
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20141021 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/08403370426000689390