國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Commerce-Business." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Essays on the corporate implications...

Amadeus, Musa.

Essays on the corporate implications of compensation incentives.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essays on the corporate implications of compensation incentives.
作者:	Amadeus, Musa.
面頁冊數:	158 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
附註:	Adviser: Ronnie Sadka.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-09A(E).
標題:	Finance.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3703708
ISBN:	9781321756692

Essays on the corporate implications of compensation incentives.
Amadeus, Musa.

Essays on the corporate implications of compensation incentives. - 158 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2015.

This dissertation is comprised of three essays which examine the ramifications of executive compensation incentive structures on corporate outcomes. In the first essay, I present evidence which suggests that executive compensation convexity, measured as the sensitivity of managerial equity compensation portfolios to stock volatility, predicts firm-specific crashes. I find that a bottom-to-top decile change in compensation convexity results in a 21% increase in a firm's unconditional ex-post idiosyncratic crash risk. In contrast, I do not find robust evidence of a symmetric relation between compensation convexity and a firm's idiosyncratic positive jump risk. Finally, I exploit exogenous variation in compensation convexity, arising from a change in the expensing treatment of executive stock options, in buttressing my interpretations within a natural experiment setting. My results suggest that managerial equity compensation portfolios do not augment a firm's future idiosyncratic crash risk because they link managerial wealth to equity prices, but rather because they tie managerial wealth to the volatility of a firm's equity.

ISBN: 9781321756692Subjects--Topical Terms:

183252
Finance.

Essays on the corporate implications of compensation incentives.
LDR:03967nmm a2200313 4500 001 476072
005 20160418090148.5
008 160517s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321756692
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3703708
035 $a AAI3703708
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Amadeus, Musa. $3 730333
245 1 0 $a Essays on the corporate implications of compensation incentives.
300 $a 158 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Ronnie Sadka.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2015.
520 $a This dissertation is comprised of three essays which examine the ramifications of executive compensation incentive structures on corporate outcomes. In the first essay, I present evidence which suggests that executive compensation convexity, measured as the sensitivity of managerial equity compensation portfolios to stock volatility, predicts firm-specific crashes. I find that a bottom-to-top decile change in compensation convexity results in a 21% increase in a firm's unconditional ex-post idiosyncratic crash risk. In contrast, I do not find robust evidence of a symmetric relation between compensation convexity and a firm's idiosyncratic positive jump risk. Finally, I exploit exogenous variation in compensation convexity, arising from a change in the expensing treatment of executive stock options, in buttressing my interpretations within a natural experiment setting. My results suggest that managerial equity compensation portfolios do not augment a firm's future idiosyncratic crash risk because they link managerial wealth to equity prices, but rather because they tie managerial wealth to the volatility of a firm's equity.
520 $a In the second essay, I exploit an exogenous negative shock to CEO compensation convexity in examining the differential ramifications of option pay and risk-taking incentives on the systematic and idiosyncratic volatility of the firm. I find new evidence that is largely consistent with the notion that compensation convexity, stemming from option convexity, predominantly incentivizes under-diversified risk-averse CEOs to increase the value of their option portfolios by increasing the systematic volatility of the firms they manage. I hypothesize that this effect manifests as systematic volatility is readily more hedgeable than idiosyncratic volatility from the perspective of risk-averse executives who are overexposed to the idiosyncratic risk of their firms. If managers use options as a conduit through which they can gamble with shareholder wealth by overexposing them to suboptimal systematic volatility, options are not serving their intended contracting function. Instead of decreasing agency costs of risk, by encouraging CEOs to adopt innovative positive NPV projects that may be primarily characterized by idiosyncratic risk, option pay may have contributed to the same frictions it was intended to reduce.
520 $a In the third essay, I present evidence that is consistent with the notion that certain managerial debt-like remuneration structures decrease the likelihood of firm-specific positive stock-price jumps. Namely, I find that a bottom-to-top decile increase in the present value of CEO pension pay leads to a roughly 25\% decrease in a firm's unconditional ex-post jump probability. However, I do not find that CEO deferred compensation decreases firm jump risk. Finally, I find that information in option-implied volatility smirks does not appear to reflect these dynamics. Together, these results suggest that not all debt-like compensation mechanisms decrease managerial risk-taking equally.
590 $a School code: 0016.
650 4 $a Finance. $3 183252
650 4 $a Economic theory. $3 533491
650 4 $a Commerce-Business. $3 730335
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0511
690 $a 0505
710 2 $a Boston College. $b Finance. $3 730334
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-09A(E).
790 $a 0016
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3703708