國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back to Search results for [ subject:"European Economic Law." ]

Market design powers of the European...

Reiter, Korbinian.

Market design powers of the European Commission?remedies under Articles 7 and 9 Regulation 1/03 /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Market design powers of the European Commission?by Korbinian Reiter.
Reminder of title:	remedies under Articles 7 and 9 Regulation 1/03 /
Author:	Reiter, Korbinian.
Published:	Berlin, Heidelberg :Springer Berlin Heidelberg :2020.
Description:	xvii, 563 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Commercial lawEuropean Union countries.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60711-4
ISBN:	9783662607114$q(electronic bk.)

Market design powers of the European Commission?remedies under Articles 7 and 9 Regulation 1/03 /
Reiter, Korbinian.

Market design powers of the European Commission?remedies under Articles 7 and 9 Regulation 1/03 /[electronic resource] :by Korbinian Reiter. - Berlin, Heidelberg :Springer Berlin Heidelberg :2020. - xvii, 563 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Munich studies on innovation and competition,v.132199-7462 ;. - Munich studies on innovation and competition ;v.1..

Introduction -- Prolegomena -- The relaxation of the link between harm and remedy -- The relaxation of procedural safeguards -- The impact of commitments on legal certainty -- Outlook: Discussions of reform proposals -- Summary of key findings.

This book provides a comprehensive analysis of the remedies practice the European Commission has adopted on the basis of articles 7 and 9 of regulation 1/03. Using article 7 as a normative benchmark, it shows that most of the criticism levelled at the Commission's article 9 decisions and the Alrosa judgment of the CJEU is not justified, since critics tend to over-state both the rigour of article 7 and the laxness of article 9. Remaining inconsistencies between the commitment practice and the standards for infringement decisions can, it is submitted, be justified by the consensual nature of commitment decisions and their underlying goal of procedural economy. Moreover, it is suggested that too little importance is generally assigned to the beneficial effect which commitments bring about by providing for precise and enforceable obligations without sacrificing the concerned undertakings' freedom to choose how to put the infringement to an end. Adopting a case-oriented approach, this study provides valuable insights for academics and practitioners alike.

ISBN: 9783662607114$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-662-60711-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

207295
Commercial law
--European Union countries.

LC Class. No.: KJE2045 / .R458 2020

Dewey Class. No.: 346.407

Market design powers of the European Commission?remedies under Articles 7 and 9 Regulation 1/03 /
LDR:02421nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 575040
003 DE-He213
005 20200716140731.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 201016s2020 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783662607114$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783662607107$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-662-60711-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-662-60711-4
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KJE2045 $b .R458 2020
072 7 $a LBBM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LBBM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 346.407 $2 23
090 $a KJE2045 $b .R379 2020
100 1 $a Reiter, Korbinian. $3 862809
245 1 0 $a Market design powers of the European Commission? $h [electronic resource] : $b remedies under Articles 7 and 9 Regulation 1/03 / $c by Korbinian Reiter.
260 $a Berlin, Heidelberg : $b Springer Berlin Heidelberg : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2020.
300 $a xvii, 563 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Munich studies on innovation and competition, $x 2199-7462 ; $v v.13
505 0 $a Introduction -- Prolegomena -- The relaxation of the link between harm and remedy -- The relaxation of procedural safeguards -- The impact of commitments on legal certainty -- Outlook: Discussions of reform proposals -- Summary of key findings.
520 $a This book provides a comprehensive analysis of the remedies practice the European Commission has adopted on the basis of articles 7 and 9 of regulation 1/03. Using article 7 as a normative benchmark, it shows that most of the criticism levelled at the Commission's article 9 decisions and the Alrosa judgment of the CJEU is not justified, since critics tend to over-state both the rigour of article 7 and the laxness of article 9. Remaining inconsistencies between the commitment practice and the standards for infringement decisions can, it is submitted, be justified by the consensual nature of commitment decisions and their underlying goal of procedural economy. Moreover, it is suggested that too little importance is generally assigned to the beneficial effect which commitments bring about by providing for precise and enforceable obligations without sacrificing the concerned undertakings' freedom to choose how to put the infringement to an end. Adopting a case-oriented approach, this study provides valuable insights for academics and practitioners alike.
650 0 $a Commercial law $z European Union countries. $3 207295
650 1 4 $a European Economic Law. $3 848282
650 2 4 $a Business Law. $3 761345
650 2 4 $a Economic Policy. $3 274350
650 2 4 $a European Union Politics. $3 739871
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Munich studies on innovation and competition ; $v v.1. $3 711384
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60711-4
950 $a Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)