國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Law." ]

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Who Pays for Road Violence? Rethinki...

Sakuraba, Celso Minoru, Jr.

Who Pays for Road Violence? Rethinking Roads, Cycling, and Tort Law.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Who Pays for Road Violence? Rethinking Roads, Cycling, and Tort Law.
作者:	Sakuraba, Celso Minoru, Jr.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018
面頁冊數:	122 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-05.
附註:	Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
附註:	Advisor: Waters, Christopher.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International80-05.
標題:	Law.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10973465
ISBN:	9780438596863

Who Pays for Road Violence? Rethinking Roads, Cycling, and Tort Law.
Sakuraba, Celso Minoru, Jr.

Who Pays for Road Violence? Rethinking Roads, Cycling, and Tort Law. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 122 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-05.

Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Road violence is now commonplace in North American cities. However, it has not always been like this. During the advent of the automobile, every road death was a source of outrage. It was concerted action from the motor industry, organized into the self-named “motordom,” that managed to shift the blame of the deaths. With the new perception that cars had the right to the roads, victims of road violence would start sharing that blame with drivers in the popular opinion. This shift affected law, including tort law. Before the advent of the motor vehicle, cycling law was an area of legal studies, called the “law of wheelmen.” It was put aside after the automobile, with the creation of road traffic laws clearly centred on motorized vehicles. Common law courts, facing tort claims arising from road violence, remained loyal to the negligence principle. This thesis explores alternatives to the classical car-centred understanding of tort law in Ontario. With an advocacy-oriented approach, it focuses on collisions involving bicycles and motor vehicles, with the intent of providing solutions that result in better distribution of the burden caused by automobiles on road safety. A comparative lens was used in order to find and analyze better options in other jurisdictions.

ISBN: 9780438596863Subjects--Topical Terms:

207600
Law.

Who Pays for Road Violence? Rethinking Roads, Cycling, and Tort Law.
LDR:02316nmm a2200313 4500 001 570687
005 20200514111939.5
008 200901s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438596863
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10973465
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uwindsor:11916
035 $a AAI10973465
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sakuraba, Celso Minoru, Jr. $3 857319
245 1 0 $a Who Pays for Road Violence? Rethinking Roads, Cycling, and Tort Law.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 122 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-05.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Waters, Christopher.
502 $a Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Road violence is now commonplace in North American cities. However, it has not always been like this. During the advent of the automobile, every road death was a source of outrage. It was concerted action from the motor industry, organized into the self-named “motordom,” that managed to shift the blame of the deaths. With the new perception that cars had the right to the roads, victims of road violence would start sharing that blame with drivers in the popular opinion. This shift affected law, including tort law. Before the advent of the motor vehicle, cycling law was an area of legal studies, called the “law of wheelmen.” It was put aside after the automobile, with the creation of road traffic laws clearly centred on motorized vehicles. Common law courts, facing tort claims arising from road violence, remained loyal to the negligence principle. This thesis explores alternatives to the classical car-centred understanding of tort law in Ontario. With an advocacy-oriented approach, it focuses on collisions involving bicycles and motor vehicles, with the intent of providing solutions that result in better distribution of the burden caused by automobiles on road safety. A comparative lens was used in order to find and analyze better options in other jurisdictions.
590 $a School code: 0115.
650 4 $a Law. $3 207600
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a University of Windsor (Canada). $b Law. $3 857320
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 80-05.
790 $a 0115
791 $a LL.M.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10973465