國立高雄大學圖資館 |

登入

回首頁

Causation in the law and the search for justice.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Causation in the law and the search for justice.
作者:	Henderson, Reba Diane.
面頁冊數:	162 p.
附註:	Major Professor: David Gruender.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-05, Section: A, page: 1599.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International60-05A.
標題:	Philosophy.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9930306
ISBN:	0599302755

Causation in the law and the search for justice.
Henderson, Reba Diane.

Causation in the law and the search for justice.[electronic resource] - 162 p.

Major Professor: David Gruender.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 1999.

Proving causation in tort cases involving product liability and toxic substances is problematic and becomes more so as the complexity of scientific issues before the court increases. This essay addresses the issue of causal proof of harm in the legal setting, specific to toxic torts, with a focus on the Supreme Court's <italic>Daubert</italic> decision. It is argued that the “more likely than not” legal sufficiency standard has, at least in a number of cases (and perhaps by the misinterpretation of the <italic>Daubert</italic> standard), been replaced by a requirement that the evidentiary proof required in these complex cases is the showing of a statistically significant cause and effect relationship identical to that acceptable in scientific research. To replace the legal sufficiency requirement with a requirement of “scientific certainty” is to effectively restructure tort law and its evidentiary requirements. This restructuring results in adversely affecting the achievement of justice and ignores fundamental moral principles that form the foundation of tort law. Considerations of justice, whether they are derived from concepts of corrective justice or from pragmatic and utilitarian concepts as one might find in the economic efficiency theory of law, mandate a resolution to the problems shown in this essay. Legal scholars have previously made several recommendations for resolution and a model, based, in part, on one of these recommendations is proposed. The concept of ‘due care’ forms the basis for this model which would develop a new legal standard of strict liability for tort cases involving product liability and toxic substances. The standard involves the elimination of consideration of general causation and the reduction of specific causation to that of association or correlation, together with a failure on the part of the producer to show that appropriate scientific standards were met during the research and development process. A well-constructed standard would accomplish several worthwhile goals: increasing the efficiency of the tort system, increasing confidence in its fairness and effectively deterring unnecessary risk-imposing behavior without negatively impacting the manufacture of needed products.

ISBN: 0599302755Subjects--Topical Terms:

176573
Philosophy.

Causation in the law and the search for justice.
LDR:03289nmm 2200289 450 001 154957
005 20021105151510.5
008 230530s1999 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 0599302755
035 $a 00087482
035 $a 154957
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 0 $a Henderson, Reba Diane. $3 212525
245 1 0 $a Causation in the law and the search for justice. $h [electronic resource]
300 $a 162 p.
500 $a Major Professor: David Gruender.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-05, Section: A, page: 1599.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 1999.
520 # $a Proving causation in tort cases involving product liability and toxic substances is problematic and becomes more so as the complexity of scientific issues before the court increases. This essay addresses the issue of causal proof of harm in the legal setting, specific to toxic torts, with a focus on the Supreme Court's <italic>Daubert</italic> decision. It is argued that the “more likely than not” legal sufficiency standard has, at least in a number of cases (and perhaps by the misinterpretation of the <italic>Daubert</italic> standard), been replaced by a requirement that the evidentiary proof required in these complex cases is the showing of a statistically significant cause and effect relationship identical to that acceptable in scientific research. To replace the legal sufficiency requirement with a requirement of “scientific certainty” is to effectively restructure tort law and its evidentiary requirements. This restructuring results in adversely affecting the achievement of justice and ignores fundamental moral principles that form the foundation of tort law. Considerations of justice, whether they are derived from concepts of corrective justice or from pragmatic and utilitarian concepts as one might find in the economic efficiency theory of law, mandate a resolution to the problems shown in this essay. Legal scholars have previously made several recommendations for resolution and a model, based, in part, on one of these recommendations is proposed. The concept of ‘due care’ forms the basis for this model which would develop a new legal standard of strict liability for tort cases involving product liability and toxic substances. The standard involves the elimination of consideration of general causation and the reduction of specific causation to that of association or correlation, together with a failure on the part of the producer to show that appropriate scientific standards were met during the research and development process. A well-constructed standard would accomplish several worthwhile goals: increasing the efficiency of the tort system, increasing confidence in its fairness and effectively deterring unnecessary risk-imposing behavior without negatively impacting the manufacture of needed products.
590 $a School code: 0071.
650 # 0 $a Philosophy. $3 176573
650 # 0 $a Law. $3 207600
650 # 0 $a History of Science. $3 212526
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0585
710 0 # $a The Florida State University. $3 212524
773 0 # $g 60-05A. $t Dissertation Abstracts International
790 $a 0071
790 1 0 $a Gruender, David, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1999
856 4 0 $u http://libsw.nuk.edu.tw/login?url=http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9930306 $z http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9930306