國立高雄大學圖資館 |

登入

回首頁

An examination of Washington, D.C.'s Juvenile Curfew Act of 1995 :A single-system approach.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An examination of Washington, D.C.'s Juvenile Curfew Act of 1995 :
其他題名:	A single-system approach.
作者:	Cole, Ralph Daniels.
面頁冊數:	396 p.
附註:	Director: John R. Belcher.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-03, Section: A, page: 1138.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International63-03A.
標題:	Sociology, Criminology and Penology.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3048464
ISBN:	0493627774

An examination of Washington, D.C.'s Juvenile Curfew Act of 1995 :A single-system approach.
Cole, Ralph Daniels.

An examination of Washington, D.C.'s Juvenile Curfew Act of 1995 :A single-system approach. [electronic resource] - 396 p.

Director: John R. Belcher.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, Baltimore, 2002.

There is a major concern among the American people that juvenile crime is escalating out of control. Juvenile curfew laws have been the fastest growing intervention to combat youth violence and juvenile crime. A single-system experimental replication design, ABAB, was used to examine whether the Juvenile Curfew Act of 1995 is effective in reducing juvenile crime in the District of Columbia. The sample for the study was the District of Columbia (N = 1). Archival data were obtained from the Information Technology Division of the Metropolitan Police Department for the time period of October 1, 1993 to September 30, 2001 of persons arrested under age 18. The data were analyzed using statistical software, SINGWIN, designed for single-system research. A five-step procedure was used to analyze each variable of the data: (1) visual analysis of the data, (2) calculation of descriptive statistics, (3) check for autocorrelation, (4) check for a significant trend, and (5) determination of whether a two-standard-deviation-band approach (Shewart chart) and/or t-test can be used to analyze the data. The findings from this research study showed the Juvenile Curfew Act of 1995 effective in reducing part 2 (non-violent) juvenile crime arrests in Washington, D.C. The possible reasons why juvenile curfew laws are not effective in reducing all types of juvenile crime (e.g., violent crimes) or appropriate as the only method of intervention are discussed. For example, curfew laws exclude the hours when juveniles are most likely to commit crimes, they do not include the entire juvenile population, there is inconsistent enforcement of the law by police, they do not fully incorporate the theories and research related to juvenile delinquency, and they do not address the major correlates of delinquency (e.g., individual, family, peers, and school factors). Future research on juvenile curfew laws needs to be completed to ascertain why these laws are ineffective in reducing certain types of crime (e.g., violent crime) and to determine whether they can be made more effective. Until such research is conducted, curfew laws may continue to be a popular but seemingly ineffective intervention when used alone in the fight against youth violence and juvenile crime.

ISBN: 0493627774Subjects--Topical Terms:

212412
Sociology, Criminology and Penology.

An examination of Washington, D.C.'s Juvenile Curfew Act of 1995 :A single-system approach.
LDR:03279nmm 2200253 450 001 155148
005 20030117152123.5
008 230606s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493627774
035 $a 00087673
035 $a 155148
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 0 $a Cole, Ralph Daniels. $3 212846
245 1 0 $a An examination of Washington, D.C.'s Juvenile Curfew Act of 1995 : $b A single-system approach. $h [electronic resource]
300 $a 396 p.
500 $a Director: John R. Belcher.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-03, Section: A, page: 1138.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, Baltimore, 2002.
520 # $a There is a major concern among the American people that juvenile crime is escalating out of control. Juvenile curfew laws have been the fastest growing intervention to combat youth violence and juvenile crime. A single-system experimental replication design, ABAB, was used to examine whether the Juvenile Curfew Act of 1995 is effective in reducing juvenile crime in the District of Columbia. The sample for the study was the District of Columbia (N = 1). Archival data were obtained from the Information Technology Division of the Metropolitan Police Department for the time period of October 1, 1993 to September 30, 2001 of persons arrested under age 18. The data were analyzed using statistical software, SINGWIN, designed for single-system research. A five-step procedure was used to analyze each variable of the data: (1) visual analysis of the data, (2) calculation of descriptive statistics, (3) check for autocorrelation, (4) check for a significant trend, and (5) determination of whether a two-standard-deviation-band approach (Shewart chart) and/or t-test can be used to analyze the data. The findings from this research study showed the Juvenile Curfew Act of 1995 effective in reducing part 2 (non-violent) juvenile crime arrests in Washington, D.C. The possible reasons why juvenile curfew laws are not effective in reducing all types of juvenile crime (e.g., violent crimes) or appropriate as the only method of intervention are discussed. For example, curfew laws exclude the hours when juveniles are most likely to commit crimes, they do not include the entire juvenile population, there is inconsistent enforcement of the law by police, they do not fully incorporate the theories and research related to juvenile delinquency, and they do not address the major correlates of delinquency (e.g., individual, family, peers, and school factors). Future research on juvenile curfew laws needs to be completed to ascertain why these laws are ineffective in reducing certain types of crime (e.g., violent crime) and to determine whether they can be made more effective. Until such research is conducted, curfew laws may continue to be a popular but seemingly ineffective intervention when used alone in the fight against youth violence and juvenile crime.
590 $a School code: 0373.
650 # 0 $a Sociology, Criminology and Penology. $3 212412
650 # 0 $a Social Work. $3 212606
650 # 0 $a Law. $3 207600
710 0 # $a University of Maryland, Baltimore. $3 212845
773 0 # $g 63-03A. $t Dissertation Abstracts International
790 $a 0373
790 1 0 $a Belcher, John R., $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://libsw.nuk.edu.tw/login?url=http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3048464 $z http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3048464