國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Unreported speeches and selection in...

Viggiano, Gregory Francis.

Unreported speeches and selection in Thucydides (Greece).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Unreported speeches and selection in Thucydides (Greece).
作者:	Viggiano, Gregory Francis.
面頁冊數:	165 p.
附註:	Director: Donald Kagan.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-11, Section: A, page: 4014.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-11A.
標題:	Literature, Classical.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3194719
ISBN:	9780542395000

Unreported speeches and selection in Thucydides (Greece).
Viggiano, Gregory Francis.

Unreported speeches and selection in Thucydides (Greece). - 165 p.

Director: Donald Kagan.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2005.

For centuries, scholars have questioned the veracity of the speeches Thucydides includes in his History. How readers answer that question is essential for any serious interpretation of the Peloponnesian War. I interpret Thucydides' controversial statement in 1.22.1 to mean that the speeches contain the actual arguments, if not the exact words, delivered by real speakers in the historical circumstances he describes. Therefore, I explore not what Thucydides does with the words of particular speakers, but why in significant instances he chose the speeches he reported and omitted others for which he had sufficient information. I begin with an analysis of the historian's programmatic statement and go on to explain my methodology for the dissertation. The study then proceeds to four test-cases. The areas of the History I examine include the discussions concerning the Corcyrean alliance (433), the Megarian Decree (433/2), the peace negotiations with Sparta (430), and the Mytilene debate (427). Each chapter identifies instances where Thucydides excluded significant speeches from his account. Working from the evidence of Thucydides' text, the plays of Aristophanes, fragments from Old Comedy, Plutarch's Lives and Diodorus, I propose plausible reconstructions of the omitted material and suggest reasons for the historian's selection. The dissertation seeks to demonstrate the selection process of Thucydides and to illuminate the understanding of the Peloponnesian War he wanted to convey to his readers. In the sections I examine, the historian rigorously chose those speeches that emphasized the impersonal forces he believed brought on the war and minimized the internal politics and factional strife that might have implicated Pericles. Thucydides' selection of speeches also enabled him to present the policies of Pericles and those of his successors, such as Cleon, in what he considered the correct light without resorting to invention.

ISBN: 9780542395000Subjects--Topical Terms:

226952
Literature, Classical.

Unreported speeches and selection in Thucydides (Greece).
LDR:02880nmm _2200265 _450 001 170926
005 20061228142322.5
008 090528s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542395000
035 $a 00242956
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 0 $a Viggiano, Gregory Francis. $3 244957
245 1 0 $a Unreported speeches and selection in Thucydides (Greece).
300 $a 165 p.
500 $a Director: Donald Kagan.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-11, Section: A, page: 4014.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2005.
520 # $a For centuries, scholars have questioned the veracity of the speeches Thucydides includes in his History. How readers answer that question is essential for any serious interpretation of the Peloponnesian War. I interpret Thucydides' controversial statement in 1.22.1 to mean that the speeches contain the actual arguments, if not the exact words, delivered by real speakers in the historical circumstances he describes. Therefore, I explore not what Thucydides does with the words of particular speakers, but why in significant instances he chose the speeches he reported and omitted others for which he had sufficient information. I begin with an analysis of the historian's programmatic statement and go on to explain my methodology for the dissertation. The study then proceeds to four test-cases. The areas of the History I examine include the discussions concerning the Corcyrean alliance (433), the Megarian Decree (433/2), the peace negotiations with Sparta (430), and the Mytilene debate (427). Each chapter identifies instances where Thucydides excluded significant speeches from his account. Working from the evidence of Thucydides' text, the plays of Aristophanes, fragments from Old Comedy, Plutarch's Lives and Diodorus, I propose plausible reconstructions of the omitted material and suggest reasons for the historian's selection. The dissertation seeks to demonstrate the selection process of Thucydides and to illuminate the understanding of the Peloponnesian War he wanted to convey to his readers. In the sections I examine, the historian rigorously chose those speeches that emphasized the impersonal forces he believed brought on the war and minimized the internal politics and factional strife that might have implicated Pericles. Thucydides' selection of speeches also enabled him to present the policies of Pericles and those of his successors, such as Cleon, in what he considered the correct light without resorting to invention.
590 $a School code: 0265.
650 # 0 $a Literature, Classical. $3 226952
650 # 0 $a History, Ancient. $3 212596
690 $a 0294
690 $a 0579
710 0 # $a Yale University. $3 212430
773 0 # $g 66-11A. $t Dissertation Abstracts International
790 $a 0265
790 1 0 $a Kagan, Donald, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://libsw.nuk.edu.tw:81/login?url=http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3194719 $z http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3194719