國立高雄大學圖資館 |

登入

回首頁

What makes the EU viable?European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	What makes the EU viable?Andrew Glencross.
其他題名:	European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience /
作者:	Glencross, Andrew.
出版者:	Basingstoke [England] ;Palgrave Macmillan,2009.
面頁冊數:	xii, 232 p. ;23 cm.
標題:	European federation.
標題:	Europe
電子資源:	access to fulltext (Palgrave)
ISBN:	9780230240896

What makes the EU viable?European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience /
Glencross, Andrew.

What makes the EU viable?European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience /[electronic resource] :Andrew Glencross. - Basingstoke [England] ;Palgrave Macmillan,2009. - xii, 232 p. ;23 cm.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Introduction: Questioning What Makes the EU Viable -- The Problem ofViability in a Compound Polity -- Developing an Analogical Comparison between the EU and the Antebellum US Republic -- Comparing how the Rules of the Game are Contested -- The Struggle to Maintain a Compound System: Creating and Contesting the Rules of the Game in European Integration -- Contrasting and Explaining the Viability of Two Compound Systems -- The Future Evolution of the EU Compound Polity: The Obstacles to Voluntary Centralization -- Conclusion: Implications for EU Studies and the Debate over the Future of Integration.

This book is distinguished by its use of the antebellum US experience as a foil to address the under-explored question of what makes the EUviable. The nature of political conflict in both casesis defined in terms of four contested rules of the game: state sovereignty, federal competences, political representation and decision-making procedures. Hence, viabilty is conceptualized as the ability to find an agreement overthese four elements.   The analysis shows that, to remain viable,the antebellum USA resorted to an ultimately untenable voluntary centralization of these rules of thegame. Conversely, the EU has maintaineda dynamic equilibrium, although this is not a self-reinforcing process. The transatlantic contrast is then used to examine proposals for reforming the EU, especially its system of political representation. The comparison reveals that, despite high expectations, changing the system of representation is no shortcut solution for the EU's constitutional woes.

Electronic reproduction.
Basingstoke, England :
Palgrave Macmillan,
2010.

Mode of access:World Wide Web.

ISBN: 9780230240896

Standard No.: 10.1057/9780230240896doiSubjects--Corporate Names:

222255
European Union.
Subjects--Topical Terms:

186050
European federation.
Subjects--Geographical Terms:

244548
Europe
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

214472
Electronic books.

LC Class. No.: JN30 / .G568 2009

Dewey Class. No.: 341.242/2

What makes the EU viable?European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience /
LDR:02913nmm 2200313Ia 4500 001 260185
003 OCoLC
005 20100709082040.0
006 m d
007 cr cn|
008 100903s2009 enk sb 001 0 eng d
020 $a 9780230240896
020 $a 0230240895
024 7 $a 10.1057/9780230240896 $2 doi
035 $a (OCoLC)497766833
035 $a ocn497766833
040 $a UKPGM $b eng $c UKPGM
043 $a e------ $a n-us---
049 $a APTA
050 1 4 $a JN30 $b .G568 2009
082 0 4 $a 341.242/2 $2 22
100 1 $a Glencross, Andrew. $3 462233
245 1 0 $a What makes the EU viable? $h [electronic resource] : $b European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience / $c Andrew Glencross.
260 $a Basingstoke [England] ; $a New York : $b Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2009.
300 $a xii, 232 p. ; $c 23 cm.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $a Introduction: Questioning What Makes the EU Viable -- The Problem ofViability in a Compound Polity -- Developing an Analogical Comparison between the EU and the Antebellum US Republic -- Comparing how the Rules of the Game are Contested -- The Struggle to Maintain a Compound System: Creating and Contesting the Rules of the Game in European Integration -- Contrasting and Explaining the Viability of Two Compound Systems -- The Future Evolution of the EU Compound Polity: The Obstacles to Voluntary Centralization -- Conclusion: Implications for EU Studies and the Debate over the Future of Integration.
520 $a This book is distinguished by its use of the antebellum US experience as a foil to address the under-explored question of what makes the EUviable. The nature of political conflict in both casesis defined in terms of four contested rules of the game: state sovereignty, federal competences, political representation and decision-making procedures. Hence, viabilty is conceptualized as the ability to find an agreement overthese four elements.   The analysis shows that, to remain viable,the antebellum USA resorted to an ultimately untenable voluntary centralization of these rules of thegame. Conversely, the EU has maintaineda dynamic equilibrium, although this is not a self-reinforcing process. The transatlantic contrast is then used to examine proposals for reforming the EU, especially its system of political representation. The comparison reveals that, despite high expectations, changing the system of representation is no shortcut solution for the EU's constitutional woes.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Basingstoke, England : $c Palgrave Macmillan, $d 2010. $n Mode of access:World Wide Web. $n System requirements: Web browser. $n Title from title screen (viewed on Jan. 11, 2010). $n Access may be restricted to users at subscribing institutions.
610 2 0 $a European Union. $3 222255
650 0 $a European federation. $3 186050
650 0 $a Political culture $z United States $x History $y 19th century. $3 175357
651 0 $a Europe $3 244548
651 0 $a United States $3 236377
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local. $3 214472
710 2 $a Palgrave Connect (Online service) $3 459825
776 1 $c Original $z 9780230224506 $z 0230224504 $w (DLC) 2009013630 $w (OCoLC)317926821
856 4 0 $3 Palgrave Connect $u https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780230240896 $z access to fulltext (Palgrave)