國立高雄大學圖資館 |

登入

回首頁

Naturalizing epistemologyThomas Kuhn and the 'essential tension' /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Naturalizing epistemologyFred D'Agostino.
其他題名:	Thomas Kuhn and the 'essential tension' /
作者:	D'Agostino, Fred.
出版者:	Basingstoke [England] ;Palgrave Macmillan,2010.
面頁冊數:	viii, 216 p. ;23 cm.
標題:	SciencePhilosophy.
電子資源:	access to fulltext (Palgrave)
ISBN:	9780230251274

Naturalizing epistemologyThomas Kuhn and the 'essential tension' /
D'Agostino, Fred.

Naturalizing epistemologyThomas Kuhn and the 'essential tension' /[electronic resource] :Fred D'Agostino. - Basingstoke [England] ;Palgrave Macmillan,2010. - viii, 216 p. ;23 cm.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Getting It Together -- Essential Tensions -- The Facilitative Possibilities -- The ConsistentPattern -- Motivating Diversity -- A Culture of Enquiry -- The Division of Labor in Communities of Enquiry -- Some Communities of Enquiry -- Naturalizing the Essential Tension.

Thomas Kuhn identified an essential tension between conservative andinnovative approaches in the development of knowledge. Should we stickwith the tried-and tested paradigm which guides enquiryin a particular field? Or should we strike out in new directions to improve out understanding? Kuhnpointed out that these two attitudes are both appropriate. At times of crisis in the development ofknowledge, a bias in favourof innovation might be appropriate. During periods of 'normal science', a more conservative approach will predominate. The 'essential tension' is the balance between these attitudes, but Kuhn insists that both are and should always be represented in the community of enquiry. This Kuhnian picture is itself not as familiar as it should be; Kuhn studies were preoccupied for decades with other issues. What the current study adds to this picture is an account of the underpinnings in individual and social psychology of the balancing of these two attitudes. Under whatconditions will individuals be motivated to adopt an innovative attitude? Under what conditions will individuals working together on a paradigm be motivated to share their dispersed information relevant tothe project of enquiry defined by that paradigm?

Electronic reproduction.
Basingstoke, England :
Palgrave Macmillan,
2010.

Mode of access:World Wide Web.

ISBN: 9780230251274

Standard No.: 10.1057/9780230251274doiSubjects--Personal Names:

187638
Kuhn, Thomas S.
Subjects--Topical Terms:

179415
Science
--Philosophy.Index Terms--Genre/Form:

214472
Electronic books.

LC Class. No.: Q175 / .D34 2010

Dewey Class. No.: 501

Naturalizing epistemologyThomas Kuhn and the 'essential tension' /
LDR:02743nmm 2200301Ia 4500 001 260302
003 OCoLC
005 20100709082158.0
006 m d
007 cr cn|
008 100903s2010 enk sb 001 0 eng d
020 $a 9780230251274
020 $a 0230251277
024 7 $a 10.1057/9780230251274 $2 doi
035 $a (OCoLC)608024966
035 $a ocn608024966
040 $a UKPGM $b eng $c UKPGM
049 $a APTA
050 1 4 $a Q175 $b .D34 2010
082 0 4 $a 501 $2 22
100 1 $a D'Agostino, Fred. $3 462524
245 1 0 $a Naturalizing epistemology $h [electronic resource] : $b Thomas Kuhn and the 'essential tension' / $c Fred D'Agostino.
260 $a Basingstoke [England] ; $a New York : $b Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2010.
300 $a viii, 216 p. ; $c 23 cm.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $a Getting It Together -- Essential Tensions -- The Facilitative Possibilities -- The ConsistentPattern -- Motivating Diversity -- A Culture of Enquiry -- The Division of Labor in Communities of Enquiry -- Some Communities of Enquiry -- Naturalizing the Essential Tension.
520 $a Thomas Kuhn identified an essential tension between conservative andinnovative approaches in the development of knowledge. Should we stickwith the tried-and tested paradigm which guides enquiryin a particular field? Or should we strike out in new directions to improve out understanding? Kuhnpointed out that these two attitudes are both appropriate. At times of crisis in the development ofknowledge, a bias in favourof innovation might be appropriate. During periods of 'normal science', a more conservative approach will predominate. The 'essential tension' is the balance between these attitudes, but Kuhn insists that both are and should always be represented in the community of enquiry. This Kuhnian picture is itself not as familiar as it should be; Kuhn studies were preoccupied for decades with other issues. What the current study adds to this picture is an account of the underpinnings in individual and social psychology of the balancing of these two attitudes. Under whatconditions will individuals be motivated to adopt an innovative attitude? Under what conditions will individuals working together on a paradigm be motivated to share their dispersed information relevant tothe project of enquiry defined by that paradigm?
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Basingstoke, England : $c Palgrave Macmillan, $d 2010. $n Mode of access:World Wide Web. $n System requirements: Web browser. $n Title from title screen (viewed on Apr. 12, 2010). $n Access may be restricted to users at subscribing institutions.
600 1 0 $a Kuhn, Thomas S. $3 187638
650 0 $a Science $x Philosophy. $3 179415
650 0 $a Knowledge, Theory of. $3 178850
650 0 $a Social psychology. $3 175625
650 0 $a Organizational behavior. $3 193147
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local. $3 214472
710 2 $a Palgrave Connect (Online service) $3 459825
776 1 $c Original $z 9780230240995 $z 0230240992 $w (OCoLC)435731059
856 4 0 $3 Palgrave Connect $u https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780230251274 $z access to fulltext (Palgrave)