國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

酒醉駕車與肇事逃逸罪之研究 = A Study on drunk dri...

國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班

酒醉駕車與肇事逃逸罪之研究 = A Study on drunk driving and hit and run offenses

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : monographic
Paralel Title:	A Study on drunk driving and hit and run offenses
Author:	陳郁文,
Secondary Intellectual Responsibility:	國立高雄大學
Place of Publication:	[高雄市]
Published:	撰者;
Year of Publication:	2012[民101]
Description:	162面圖，表格 : 30公分;
Subject:	具體危險
Subject:	potential damage
Online resource:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/26997226798954195239
Notes:	參考書目：面146-152
Summary:	酒後駕車及因肇事死亡率逐年攀升，促成「危險駕駛動力交通工具罪（不能安全駕駛罪）」與「肇事逃逸罪」訂立。法務部所訂酒精濃度之法定移送標準，在實務、學者產生不同解讀，就本罪之危險犯屬性、相關構成要件的解釋等等亦有不同看法。一有肇事逃逸，肇事逃逸罪與保護者遺棄罪於焉臨之。因肇事逃逸罪之立法理由說明，致使肇事逃逸罪與遺棄罪，關係更為緊密。肇事逃逸罪本身從保護法益的定位開始就難以釐清究竟，加之「致人死傷」的性質亦有爭議，相對地，保護者遺棄罪對交通肇事受害者生命法益所具有之保護功能則較為明確。肇事者的保證人地位在於違背義務的危險前行為。 The total number of drunk driving and hit and run death has increased each year, which leads to the passing of drunk driving offenses and hit and run offenses by Legislative Yuan. However, some requirements of these offenses, such as potential damage offense and blood alcohol concentration, remain disputable in practice and academia. Generally, the dispute of abandonment follows a hit and run accident. The Criminal Code provides broader protection in the offense of abandonment than in the offense of hit-and-run death.

酒醉駕車與肇事逃逸罪之研究 = A Study on drunk driving and hit and run offenses
陳, 郁文

酒醉駕車與肇事逃逸罪之研究 = A Study on drunk driving and hit and run offenses / 陳郁文撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2012[民101]. - 162面 ; 圖，表格 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面146-152.
具體危險potential damage

酒醉駕車與肇事逃逸罪之研究 = A Study on drunk driving and hit and run offenses
LDR:02426nam0a2200277 450 001 360449
005 20170214094544.0
009 360449
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214d2012 k y0chiy05 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 酒醉駕車與肇事逃逸罪之研究 $d A Study on drunk driving and hit and run offenses $z eng $f 陳郁文撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2012[民101]
215 0 $a 162面 $c 圖，表格 $d 30公分
300 $a 參考書目：面146-152
314 $a 指導教授：陳子平博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班
330 $a 酒後駕車及因肇事死亡率逐年攀升，促成「危險駕駛動力交通工具罪（不能安全駕駛罪）」與「肇事逃逸罪」訂立。法務部所訂酒精濃度之法定移送標準，在實務、學者產生不同解讀，就本罪之危險犯屬性、相關構成要件的解釋等等亦有不同看法。一有肇事逃逸，肇事逃逸罪與保護者遺棄罪於焉臨之。因肇事逃逸罪之立法理由說明，致使肇事逃逸罪與遺棄罪，關係更為緊密。肇事逃逸罪本身從保護法益的定位開始就難以釐清究竟，加之「致人死傷」的性質亦有爭議，相對地，保護者遺棄罪對交通肇事受害者生命法益所具有之保護功能則較為明確。肇事者的保證人地位在於違背義務的危險前行為。 The total number of drunk driving and hit and run death has increased each year, which leads to the passing of drunk driving offenses and hit and run offenses by Legislative Yuan. However, some requirements of these offenses, such as potential damage offense and blood alcohol concentration, remain disputable in practice and academia. Generally, the dispute of abandonment follows a hit and run accident. The Criminal Code provides broader protection in the offense of abandonment than in the offense of hit-and-run death.
510 1 $a A Study on drunk driving and hit and run offenses $z eng
610 0 $a 具體危險 $a 抽象危險 $a 原因自由行為 $a 信賴原則 $a 保證人地位
610 1 $a potential damage $a substantive danger $a actio libera in causa $a principle of reliance $a guarantor
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 382101 7540 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 陳 $b 郁文 $4 撰 $3 45267
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 政治法律學系碩士班 $3 166052
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20130306 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/26997226798954195239