國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

我國民法夫妻剩餘財產分配之研究 = Research on the Di...

何曜男

我國民法夫妻剩餘財產分配之研究 = Research on the Distribution of Matrimonial Property under R.O.C. Law

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	Research on the Distribution of Matrimonial Property under R.O.C. Law
作者:	何曜男,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2013[民102]
面頁冊數:	163面圖，表格 : 30公分;
標題:	夫妻財產
標題:	matrimonial property
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/30356053444871486372
附註:	參考書目：面151-154
摘要註:	有關我國民法夫妻財產制度，自民國十九年制定後，迄民國一百零一年十二月七日止，前後共歷經五次修法，其中最重要的修法有民國七十四年六月五日，基於家事勞動價值之肯認而增訂生效之民法第一千零三十條之一有關夫妻剩餘財產分配請求權之規定，及民國九十一年六月二十八日增訂生效之所謂婚後財產意義及夫妻剩餘財產分配請求權之相關保全措施、追加計算及納入等規定。修法過程，期間大法官會議曾就夫妻剩餘財產分配請求權相關適用之疑義，作成釋字第四一0號解釋及釋字第六二0號解釋。而有關夫妻剩餘財產分配請求權之性質，是否為專屬權，更是最近三次修法爭論之點。故本論文主要乃針對我國夫妻財產制度、民法第一千零三十條之一夫妻剩餘財產分配之請求權之沿革演變、民法第一千零三十條之一所謂「法定財產關係消滅時」包含那些情形？剩餘財產範圍之規定為何？剩餘財產分配請求權之保全行使等及司法院大法官釋字第四一Ｏ號解釋及釋字第六二Ｏ號解釋，對「婚後財產」之認定等問題。試圖以實務個案予以探討，並對民國一百零一年十二月七日之修法內容及其理由，在現行相關法令未為配合修正前，可能衍生之問題提出個人研究之見解及建議。 The matrimonial property system under the R.O.C. Civil Code had been revised five times as of December 7, 2012 ever since it was first formulated in 1930. One of the most important such revisions fell on June 5, 1985 when Article 1031-1 was introduced and put into effect which provided for the claim to the distribution of the remainder of matrimonial property thanks to the recognition of the values of housework whereas another such revision came into force on June 28, 2002 when post-marital property was defined and the relevant measures of preservation, addition and inclusion with respect to the claim to the distribution of the remainder of matrimonial property were provided. During the process of the relevant revisions, the Justices of the Constitutional Court issued J.Y. Interpretation Nos. 410 and 620 to deal with the questions regarding the applications of the claim to the distribution of the remainder of matrimonial property. A more central issue of the debate over the course of the three latest amendments to the law was whether the claim to the distribution of the remainder of matrimonial property is an exclusive right in nature. Hence this thesis is primarily intended to probe into such questions regarding the R.O.C. matrimonial property system as the history and developments of the claim to the distribution of the remainder of matrimonial property under Article 1030-1 of the Civil Code, the circumstances of “dissolution of the statutory marital property regime” contemplated thereunder, the scope of the remainder of such property, the preservation of the claim to the remainder of such property, as well as the determinations as to “post-marital property” under J.Y. Interpretation No. 410, J.Y. Interpretation No. 620, by examining actual cases. In addition, personal views and suggestions will also be offered in respect of the potential issues which may arise out of the amendment to the law on December 7, 2012 and the reasons for said amendment before the existing and relevant laws and regulations are amended accordingly.

我國民法夫妻剩餘財產分配之研究 = Research on the Distribution of Matrimonial Property under R.O.C. Law
何, 曜男

我國民法夫妻剩餘財產分配之研究 = Research on the Distribution of Matrimonial Property under R.O.C. Law / 何曜男撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2013[民102]. - 163面 ; 圖，表格 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面151-154.
夫妻財產matrimonial property

我國民法夫妻剩餘財產分配之研究 = Research on the Distribution of Matrimonial Property under R.O.C. Law
LDR:04836nam0a2200277 450 001 389590
005 20170214093011.0
009 389590
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214d2013 k y0chiy05 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 我國民法夫妻剩餘財產分配之研究 $d Research on the Distribution of Matrimonial Property under R.O.C. Law $z eng $f 何曜男撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2013[民102]
215 0 $a 163面 $c 圖，表格 $d 30公分
300 $a 參考書目：面151-154
314 $a 指導教授：莊寶鵰博士，姚志明博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學高階法律暨管理碩士在職專班(EMLBA)
330 $a 有關我國民法夫妻財產制度，自民國十九年制定後，迄民國一百零一年十二月七日止，前後共歷經五次修法，其中最重要的修法有民國七十四年六月五日，基於家事勞動價值之肯認而增訂生效之民法第一千零三十條之一有關夫妻剩餘財產分配請求權之規定，及民國九十一年六月二十八日增訂生效之所謂婚後財產意義及夫妻剩餘財產分配請求權之相關保全措施、追加計算及納入等規定。修法過程，期間大法官會議曾就夫妻剩餘財產分配請求權相關適用之疑義，作成釋字第四一0號解釋及釋字第六二0號解釋。而有關夫妻剩餘財產分配請求權之性質，是否為專屬權，更是最近三次修法爭論之點。故本論文主要乃針對我國夫妻財產制度、民法第一千零三十條之一夫妻剩餘財產分配之請求權之沿革演變、民法第一千零三十條之一所謂「法定財產關係消滅時」包含那些情形？剩餘財產範圍之規定為何？剩餘財產分配請求權之保全行使等及司法院大法官釋字第四一Ｏ號解釋及釋字第六二Ｏ號解釋，對「婚後財產」之認定等問題。試圖以實務個案予以探討，並對民國一百零一年十二月七日之修法內容及其理由，在現行相關法令未為配合修正前，可能衍生之問題提出個人研究之見解及建議。 The matrimonial property system under the R.O.C. Civil Code had been revised five times as of December 7, 2012 ever since it was first formulated in 1930. One of the most important such revisions fell on June 5, 1985 when Article 1031-1 was introduced and put into effect which provided for the claim to the distribution of the remainder of matrimonial property thanks to the recognition of the values of housework whereas another such revision came into force on June 28, 2002 when post-marital property was defined and the relevant measures of preservation, addition and inclusion with respect to the claim to the distribution of the remainder of matrimonial property were provided. During the process of the relevant revisions, the Justices of the Constitutional Court issued J.Y. Interpretation Nos. 410 and 620 to deal with the questions regarding the applications of the claim to the distribution of the remainder of matrimonial property. A more central issue of the debate over the course of the three latest amendments to the law was whether the claim to the distribution of the remainder of matrimonial property is an exclusive right in nature. Hence this thesis is primarily intended to probe into such questions regarding the R.O.C. matrimonial property system as the history and developments of the claim to the distribution of the remainder of matrimonial property under Article 1030-1 of the Civil Code, the circumstances of “dissolution of the statutory marital property regime” contemplated thereunder, the scope of the remainder of such property, the preservation of the claim to the remainder of such property, as well as the determinations as to “post-marital property” under J.Y. Interpretation No. 410, J.Y. Interpretation No. 620, by examining actual cases. In addition, personal views and suggestions will also be offered in respect of the potential issues which may arise out of the amendment to the law on December 7, 2012 and the reasons for said amendment before the existing and relevant laws and regulations are amended accordingly.
510 1 $a Research on the Distribution of Matrimonial Property under R.O.C. Law $z eng
610 0 $a 夫妻財產 $a 家事勞動 $a 剩餘財產分配請求權 $a 婚後財產 $a 專屬權 $a 釋字第四一Ｏ號 $a 釋字第六二Ｏ號
610 1 $a matrimonial property $a housework $a claim to the distribution of the remainder of ma $a post-martial property $a exclusive right $a J.Y. Interpretation No. 410 $a J.Y. Interpretation No. 620
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 349952 2166 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 何 $b 曜男 $4 撰 $3 614459
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 高階法律暨管理碩士在職專班(EMLBA) $3 483026
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20131004 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/30356053444871486372