| 摘要註: |
歷史建築的活化再利用正在世界蓬勃發展，不論東西方為延續歷史建築的生命，皆導入合宜之商業行為，讓歷史建築走入人群，成為我們生活的一部份，這些歷史建築可藉由本身的文化價值創造財源，達到永續存在的目標。回顧台灣十多年來對歷史建築的管理，多由政府主導進行維修，維修完成後的後續管理，亦多由政府負責，造成政府莫大的財政負擔。歷史建築多為老舊建物，有別於一般新的公共建設，其維護與管理往往需要更龐大的經費；然隨著政府財政赤字的擴大，各級政府的財政支出皆捉襟見肘，為因應此一問題莫不積極尋找解決方案，故以審慎的態度，引進民間資金參與公共建設成為新的選項。歷史建築為全民的文化資產亦為公共建設之一環，故引進民間資源參與，除減少政府的財政支出外亦可導入民間的創意與效率，提升歷史建築的使用率；但因為歷史建築為文化資產，於創造財源時亦需肩負一定之文化使命，故推動民間參與過程中遭遇不少的困難，例如：文化與市場難以兩全、法令不夠周全造成民間參與的疑義，或投資誘因不足致乏人問津等；皆造成執行上的困擾。因此在實際執行前之民間參與可行性分析更顯重要，最近高雄市歷史建築「逍遙園」因建築毀損及文物遭竊問題，而受到媒體及民眾的重視；對於該園的保存與管理，高雄市政府也礙於經費問題，無法取得主導權，由於「逍遙園」目前有面臨消失的急廹性，故此次選定「逍遙園」進行民間參與之可行性分析，期能為「逍遙園」的重生尋求民間參與的可行性。本文以此作為主題建立可行性分析架構，分析發現，歷史建築「逍遙園」民間參與之可行性，在法律、市場及財務等三方面皆具可行性，另依研究結論，本研究提出下列建議：1.持續以開放態度引進民間機構參與歷史建築的保存與管理2.政府應進行全區規劃，建構周邊友善環境以利民間參與3.逍遙園目前面臨損毀的問題，應立即進行初步的改善。本研究提出上述結論與建議，期望能作為日後推動歷史建築「逍遙園」民間參與可行性之參考。 Historic buildings revitalization and reuse, in recent years throughout the world is booming, for the continuation of the historical building's life, regardless of eastern and western countries are importing modest business practices, so that the historic buildings combine the masses, has become our part of life, and these historical construction equipment, create more cultural source output, achieve sustainable preservation goals.Over the years the management of historical buildings in Taiwan, mostly led by the government for maintenance and follow-up management, resulting in huge financial burden. Historic buildings are mostly old buildings, different from the general new public construction, its maintenance and management often requires more substantial funding. Based on the expansion of the fiscal deficit, at all levels of government expenditure seriously inadequate, so in a prudent manner, and actively looking for solutions to encourage private capital to participate in public construction as a new option program.Historic buildings not only for the people's cultural assets, but also a public building, the introduction of private resources to participate, in addition to reducing government expenditure, it can also import creativity and efficiency, improve the utilization of historic buildings; historic buildings belonging to cultural assets, financial resources to create a cultural mission, thus promoting private participation in the process encountered many difficulties, such as: culture and the market is difficult endowment, investment laws are not explicit and inadequate incentives and other factors.In recent years, Kaohsiung historic building "Shoyoen", suffered damage to buildings and heritage theft and other issues, for the preservation and management, by the media and the public's attention, the Kaohsiung City Government is facing financial constraints, dominance, and the disappearance of crisis and other factors, Therefore, giving more prominence to private participation and the importance of feasibility analysis.This study established the feasibility of the analytical framework, found in the legal, marketing and financial feasibility respective fields in three dimensions, and finally this study makes the following recommendations:(1) Continue with an open mind the introduction of private sector participation in the preservation of historic buildings management(2) Government should conduct the region's planning and construction of the surrounding environment-friendly in order to facilitate private participation(3) Runaway corruption issue currently facing the garden, should immediately make a preliminary improvements.Finally, discussed academic and management implications conclude the study. |