國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

從行政執法作為論行政救濟之功效 = On the Effect of A...

國立高雄大學高階法律暨管理碩士在職專班(EMLBA)

從行政執法作為論行政救濟之功效 = On the Effect of Administrative Remedy : 以酒駕取締案件為例; A Case Study of Drunk Driving Ban

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	On the Effect of Administrative Remedy
副題名:	以酒駕取締案件為例
作者:	王民道,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	高雄市
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2017[民106]
面頁冊數:	136面圖，表格 : 30公分;
標題:	救濟
標題:	remed
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/93213488185080495291
附註:	106年4月25日公開
附註:	參考書目: 面59-64
摘要註:	人民自己的基本權利(如:自由權、工作權…等)是受憲法所保障，然而在法治國家中，公務人員執行行政公權力的同時需具備有公平、公信、公正為原則立場，且都有依法行政的義務行使權利；再者在白紙黑字各類法定規則中，亦可能會發生不同公務人員對於相同的相關規定存有不同認知與見解，因此導致有不同行政作為、行政裁決情況發生。如此現象可能不僅嚴重造成洽公民眾的權利受損，甚至深陷於公共行政相關程序的盲從、無助…等,仍無法解決民眾所需排除之困難，更造成民眾對政府形象嚴重遭受打擊；法律的制定是為了保障人民基本權益,公權力的執行是確立及落實,如此國家政策與制度作業順利推行是必然的。故法律規定上，除了公務人員須遵守行政程序有明訂的處理原則以及人民所需遵循的相關規定外，便衍生出行政訴訟與行政救濟途徑，雖然未必能百分百為自我損失的權利有所平反，但使民眾遭受權利受損或認為行政作為不合法時，擁有可表達其訴求及爭取自我基本權利管道！讓法院將事實還原，並以公正立場審理並作最後合理裁定。本論文研製之重點，則以日常生活中，常見酒後駕車違規取締、裁決之案例，以及申請行政救濟之正反結果情況深入探討其人民權利與行政義務之平衡。It is demended that people their basic rights (such as: the right to freedom, the right to work…etc) which are protected by constitution. Hovever, the government employees comply public rights which are equipped with fair, credibility, and justice as principle in the legal system of country and have obligation rights to excute the laws. Furthermore, the government employees may have some distinct aspects to comply the same regulation. As a result, there are different situation of excutive and different excutive jundication which happened.Not only people lose their rights but are the government also involved in such a disorder procedure of the laws. Whats worse, people feel fruatrated at the administration of public rights because of the government employees existing distinct aspects for excutive situations. It also damages the image of governments cridibility. Formulating the laws which the public rights should be assurd and carried out is to protect people basic rights. Therefore, it is required that our national policies and regulations be smoothly.In addition to the laws specified, the government employees comply the laws and people abided by the laws. At the same time, it will be derived from administrative litigation and administrative remedy. The government provides the administrative ligitgation for people but it may not be remedy for all to people. People can demand their basic rights when their rights are loss or unresonable for the government of excutive administration. Let the court back to the reality and make the case justify. The points of this paper are discussed about drunk driving banned and cases of adjudication in their daily life. Trying to make balance between people basic rights and administrative obligation when people apply litigation.

從行政執法作為論行政救濟之功效 = On the Effect of Administrative Remedy : 以酒駕取締案件為例; A Case Study of Drunk Driving Ban
王, 民道

從行政執法作為論行政救濟之功效 = On the Effect of Administrative Remedy : 以酒駕取締案件為例 / 王民道撰 - 高雄市 : 撰者, 2017[民106]. - 136面 ; 圖，表格 ; 30公分.
106年4月25日公開參考書目: 面59-64.
救濟remed

從行政執法作為論行政救濟之功效 = On the Effect of Administrative Remedy : 以酒駕取締案件為例; A Case Study of Drunk Driving Ban
LDR:04374pam0a2200277 450 001 496638
005 20170505090133.0
010 0 $b 平裝
010 0 $b 精裝
100 $a 20170406d2017 k y0chiy50 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 從行政執法作為論行政救濟之功效 $e 以酒駕取締案件為例 $d On the Effect of Administrative Remedy $e A Case Study of Drunk Driving Ban $z eng $f 王民道撰
210 $a 高雄市 $c 撰者 $d 2017[民106]
215 0 $a 136面 $c 圖，表格 $d 30公分
300 $a 106年4月25日公開
300 $a 參考書目: 面59-64
314 $a 指導教授: 陳正根博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學高階法律暨管理碩士在職專班(EMLBA)
330 $a 人民自己的基本權利(如:自由權、工作權…等)是受憲法所保障，然而在法治國家中，公務人員執行行政公權力的同時需具備有公平、公信、公正為原則立場，且都有依法行政的義務行使權利；再者在白紙黑字各類法定規則中，亦可能會發生不同公務人員對於相同的相關規定存有不同認知與見解，因此導致有不同行政作為、行政裁決情況發生。如此現象可能不僅嚴重造成洽公民眾的權利受損，甚至深陷於公共行政相關程序的盲從、無助…等,仍無法解決民眾所需排除之困難，更造成民眾對政府形象嚴重遭受打擊；法律的制定是為了保障人民基本權益,公權力的執行是確立及落實,如此國家政策與制度作業順利推行是必然的。故法律規定上，除了公務人員須遵守行政程序有明訂的處理原則以及人民所需遵循的相關規定外，便衍生出行政訴訟與行政救濟途徑，雖然未必能百分百為自我損失的權利有所平反，但使民眾遭受權利受損或認為行政作為不合法時，擁有可表達其訴求及爭取自我基本權利管道！讓法院將事實還原，並以公正立場審理並作最後合理裁定。本論文研製之重點，則以日常生活中，常見酒後駕車違規取締、裁決之案例，以及申請行政救濟之正反結果情況深入探討其人民權利與行政義務之平衡。It is demended that people their basic rights (such as: the right to freedom, the right to work…etc) which are protected by constitution. Hovever, the government employees comply public rights which are equipped with fair, credibility, and justice as principle in the legal system of country and have obligation rights to excute the laws. Furthermore, the government employees may have some distinct aspects to comply the same regulation. As a result, there are different situation of excutive and different excutive jundication which happened.Not only people lose their rights but are the government also involved in such a disorder procedure of the laws. Whats worse, people feel fruatrated at the administration of public rights because of the government employees existing distinct aspects for excutive situations. It also damages the image of governments cridibility. Formulating the laws which the public rights should be assurd and carried out is to protect people basic rights. Therefore, it is required that our national policies and regulations be smoothly.In addition to the laws specified, the government employees comply the laws and people abided by the laws. At the same time, it will be derived from administrative litigation and administrative remedy. The government provides the administrative ligitgation for people but it may not be remedy for all to people. People can demand their basic rights when their rights are loss or unresonable for the government of excutive administration. Let the court back to the reality and make the case justify. The points of this paper are discussed about drunk driving banned and cases of adjudication in their daily life. Trying to make balance between people basic rights and administrative obligation when people apply litigation.
510 1 $a On the Effect of Administrative Remedy $e A Case Study of Drunk Driving Ban $z eng
610 0 $a 救濟 $a 依法行政 $a 權益
610 1 $a remed $a administrative law $a rights
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 349952 1073 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 王 $b 民道 $4 撰 $3 759237
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 高階法律暨管理碩士在職專班(EMLBA) $3 483026
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20170406 $g CCR
856 7 # $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/93213488185080495291 $z 電子資源 $2 http