國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Perceptions of the Invention Disclos...

Rice-Moore, Sharla V.

Perceptions of the Invention Disclosure Process at a Federal Laboratory after the America Invents Act of 2011.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Perceptions of the Invention Disclosure Process at a Federal Laboratory after the America Invents Act of 2011.
作者:	Rice-Moore, Sharla V.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016
面頁冊數:	183 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
附註:	Adviser: William Daniel Young.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-09A(E).
標題:	Patent law.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10107188
ISBN:	9781339705903

Perceptions of the Invention Disclosure Process at a Federal Laboratory after the America Invents Act of 2011.
Rice-Moore, Sharla V.

Perceptions of the Invention Disclosure Process at a Federal Laboratory after the America Invents Act of 2011. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 183 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (D.B.A.)--Wilmington University (Delaware), 2016.

The America Invents Act of 2011 reformed the patent process in the United States. This study focused on the effect of one provision which allows the first inventor to file the application of patent to become the owner of the intellectual property. Prior to this, the Patent and Trademark Act of 1980 allowed small businesses, universities, and non-profit institutions to pursue ownership of intellectual property developed from federally funded research. The new regulations could influence government employees' disclosure of invention and new technology. There is limited research on the disclosure of technology process for government employees. This study examined 1,389 invention disclosure forms from March 2009 to March 2015 during three phases of the law: before it was signed, before the implementation of the first inventor to file provision in 2013, and after full enactment. The reported State of Development showed significant changes prior to implementation for large companies. The findings reveal disclosures were filed at an earlier stage of development, but no change was noted in the significance of the technology. A survey was also distributed using the framework of Organizational Justice theory.

ISBN: 9781339705903Subjects--Topical Terms:

766021
Patent law.

Perceptions of the Invention Disclosure Process at a Federal Laboratory after the America Invents Act of 2011.
LDR:02541nmm a2200313 4500 001 502054
005 20170619070721.5
008 170818s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339705903
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10107188
035 $a AAI10107188
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rice-Moore, Sharla V. $3 766019
245 1 0 $a Perceptions of the Invention Disclosure Process at a Federal Laboratory after the America Invents Act of 2011.
260 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 183 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: William Daniel Young.
502 $a Thesis (D.B.A.)--Wilmington University (Delaware), 2016.
520 $a The America Invents Act of 2011 reformed the patent process in the United States. This study focused on the effect of one provision which allows the first inventor to file the application of patent to become the owner of the intellectual property. Prior to this, the Patent and Trademark Act of 1980 allowed small businesses, universities, and non-profit institutions to pursue ownership of intellectual property developed from federally funded research. The new regulations could influence government employees' disclosure of invention and new technology. There is limited research on the disclosure of technology process for government employees. This study examined 1,389 invention disclosure forms from March 2009 to March 2015 during three phases of the law: before it was signed, before the implementation of the first inventor to file provision in 2013, and after full enactment. The reported State of Development showed significant changes prior to implementation for large companies. The findings reveal disclosures were filed at an earlier stage of development, but no change was noted in the significance of the technology. A survey was also distributed using the framework of Organizational Justice theory.
520 $a The results showed the disclosure reporting process was fair and unbiased. The research supports the efforts of management to keep employees informed about the disclosure process and the importance of technology transfer of government developed innovation.
520 $a Key words: America Invents Act, Organizational Justice, patent process.
590 $a School code: 1517.
650 4 $a Patent law. $3 766021
650 4 $a Aerospace engineering. $3 324294
690 $a 0562
690 $a 0538
710 2 $a Wilmington University (Delaware). $b College of Business. $3 766020
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-09A(E).
790 $a 1517
791 $a D.B.A.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10107188