國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Essays on the historicity of capital

Herscovici, Alain.

Essays on the historicity of capital

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essays on the historicity of capitalby Alain Herscovici.
作者:	Herscovici, Alain.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019.
面頁冊數:	xv, 187 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Capital.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14838-6
ISBN:	9783030148386$q(electronic bk.)

Essays on the historicity of capital
Herscovici, Alain.

Essays on the historicity of capital[electronic resource] /by Alain Herscovici. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019. - xv, 187 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. Introduction -- Part I: The Epistemological Dimension of Historicity -- 2. Preliminary Considerations about the Historicity of Capital -- 3. Economic Epistemology -- 4. Ricardo, Keynes and Stiglitz: The Epistemological Convergences -- Part II: Historicity and Economic Sciences -- 5. Theory of Differential Rent and Capital Heterogeneity: a Neo-Ricardian Analysis -- 6. The Nature of Capital in the General Theory: Theoretical Implications and Structural Instability -- 7. The Relational Economics: an Example of Substantial Hypothesis Refutation -- 8. The Problem of the Empirical Data: Capital in the Twenty First Century? -- 9. General Conclusion.

The methodological and epistemological problem this book studies is related to the heterogeneity of capital. Capitals are heterogeneous through time and space; at the same time, various heterogeneous capitals must be aggregated, as shown by Ricardo and Keynes. On the other hand, the value of some quantity of aggregate capital changes over time, as demonstrated by Ricardo, Keynes and Stiglitz. For this purpose, this book considers Ricardo, Keynes and Stiglitz. For each author, capital is heterogeneous: Ricardo, from his labor theory; Keynes from the change in expectations, in regard to the return of such capital; and Stiglitz from the divergences between the different groups' expectations. Ricardo was the first author who explained why the value of capital cannot be determined independently from distribution variables and consequently why such value changes when distribution variables change -- this mechanism was deepened by Sraffa and the neo-Ricardian school. Keynes, with the concept of supply price of capital, explains why such value moves in regard to long-term expectations. Finally, Stiglitz's analysis is a complementary approach in regard to Keynes's, insofar as he details the mechanism of speculation observed by Keynes from asymmetries of information. Keynes and Stiglitz's approaches allow complement Ricardo's analysis, insofar expectations are absent from Ricardo's framework. This book argues that epistemological choices allow going beyond the traditional opposition between neo-Ricardian and post-Keynesian approaches, introducing path dependence mechanisms and an "expectational" dimension. From the moment that capital is not a constant value over time and space, it is not possible anymore to consider a well-behaved production function, which this book argues implies refuting all the neoclassical framework, from the stability of the macroeconomic equilibrium and the Marshallian market equilibrium to the convergence towards the steady state.

ISBN: 9783030148386$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-14838-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

174914
Capital.

LC Class. No.: HC79.C3 / H477 2019

Dewey Class. No.: 363

Essays on the historicity of capital
LDR:03578nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 556736
003 DE-He213
005 20190926150820.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 191127s2019 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030148386$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030148379$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-14838-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-14838-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a HC79.C3 $b H477 2019
072 7 $a KCZ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a BUS069000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a KCZ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 363 $2 23
090 $a HC79.C3 $b H571 2019
100 1 $a Herscovici, Alain. $3 838990
245 1 0 $a Essays on the historicity of capital $h [electronic resource] / $c by Alain Herscovici.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2019.
300 $a xv, 187 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- Part I: The Epistemological Dimension of Historicity -- 2. Preliminary Considerations about the Historicity of Capital -- 3. Economic Epistemology -- 4. Ricardo, Keynes and Stiglitz: The Epistemological Convergences -- Part II: Historicity and Economic Sciences -- 5. Theory of Differential Rent and Capital Heterogeneity: a Neo-Ricardian Analysis -- 6. The Nature of Capital in the General Theory: Theoretical Implications and Structural Instability -- 7. The Relational Economics: an Example of Substantial Hypothesis Refutation -- 8. The Problem of the Empirical Data: Capital in the Twenty First Century? -- 9. General Conclusion.
520 $a The methodological and epistemological problem this book studies is related to the heterogeneity of capital. Capitals are heterogeneous through time and space; at the same time, various heterogeneous capitals must be aggregated, as shown by Ricardo and Keynes. On the other hand, the value of some quantity of aggregate capital changes over time, as demonstrated by Ricardo, Keynes and Stiglitz. For this purpose, this book considers Ricardo, Keynes and Stiglitz. For each author, capital is heterogeneous: Ricardo, from his labor theory; Keynes from the change in expectations, in regard to the return of such capital; and Stiglitz from the divergences between the different groups' expectations. Ricardo was the first author who explained why the value of capital cannot be determined independently from distribution variables and consequently why such value changes when distribution variables change -- this mechanism was deepened by Sraffa and the neo-Ricardian school. Keynes, with the concept of supply price of capital, explains why such value moves in regard to long-term expectations. Finally, Stiglitz's analysis is a complementary approach in regard to Keynes's, insofar as he details the mechanism of speculation observed by Keynes from asymmetries of information. Keynes and Stiglitz's approaches allow complement Ricardo's analysis, insofar expectations are absent from Ricardo's framework. This book argues that epistemological choices allow going beyond the traditional opposition between neo-Ricardian and post-Keynesian approaches, introducing path dependence mechanisms and an "expectational" dimension. From the moment that capital is not a constant value over time and space, it is not possible anymore to consider a well-behaved production function, which this book argues implies refuting all the neoclassical framework, from the stability of the macroeconomic equilibrium and the Marshallian market equilibrium to the convergence towards the steady state.
650 0 $a Capital. $3 174914
650 1 4 $a History of Economic Thought/Methodology. $3 760025
650 2 4 $a Heterodox Economics. $3 741898
650 2 4 $a Labor Economics. $3 273687
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14838-6
950 $a Economics and Finance (Springer-41170)