國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The evaluators' eyeimpact assessment...

Derrick, Gemma.

The evaluators' eyeimpact assessment and academic peer review /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The evaluators' eyeby Gemma Derrick.
其他題名:	impact assessment and academic peer review /
作者:	Derrick, Gemma.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018.
面頁冊數:	xv, 230 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Scholarly publishing.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63627-6
ISBN:	9783319636276$q(electronic bk.)

The evaluators' eyeimpact assessment and academic peer review /
Derrick, Gemma.

The evaluators' eyeimpact assessment and academic peer review /[electronic resource] :by Gemma Derrick. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018. - xv, 230 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Chapter 1. Impact from the Evaluator's Eye -- Chapter 2. Peer Review of Impact: Could it Work? -- Chapter 3. Evaluation Mechanics -- Chapter 4. Introducing Impact to the Evaluators -- Chapter 5. Peers, Experts and Impact -- Chapter 6. Risking Groupthink in Impact Assessment -- Chapter 7. Working Smarter with Multiple Impacts and One Eye.

This book offers an empirical analysis of how academic peer review panels mediate the traditionally non-academic criterion of societal impact. The UK's 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF2014) for the first time included an "Impact" criterion that considered how research had influenced society, beyond academia. Using a series of interviews with REF2014 Main Panel A evaluators, the book explores how a dominant definition of Impact was constructed within panels and how this led to the development of strategies around valuing it as an ambiguous object. By doing so, Derrick brings a unique perspective to Impact that is currently overlooked in the dominant Impact evaluation discourse. Through examining the evaluation procedure as a dynamic process it is argued that the best models, strategies and insights for Impact evaluation are those constructed in practice, within peer review groups. By exploring the legitimacy of peer review as a tool to assess the societal impact of research, Derrick states that the future for Impact evaluation is not to seek alternative tools where peer review seemingly fails, but instead to highlight ways in which peer review panels can work smarter. The book will be essential reading for students, academics and policy-makers working in Education, as well as researchers interested in peer review processes and the research evaluation frameworks and audit exercises globally.

ISBN: 9783319636276$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-63627-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

258526
Scholarly publishing.

LC Class. No.: Z286.S37 / D47 2018

Dewey Class. No.: 070.5

The evaluators' eyeimpact assessment and academic peer review /
LDR:02720nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 568681
003 DE-He213
005 20191024102439.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 200707s2018 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319636276$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319636269$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-63627-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-63627-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a Z286.S37 $b D47 2018
072 7 $a JNM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a EDU015000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JNM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 070.5 $2 23
090 $a Z286.S37 $b D438 2018
100 1 $a Derrick, Gemma. $3 854579
245 1 4 $a The evaluators' eye $h [electronic resource] : $b impact assessment and academic peer review / $c by Gemma Derrick.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2018.
300 $a xv, 230 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Impact from the Evaluator's Eye -- Chapter 2. Peer Review of Impact: Could it Work? -- Chapter 3. Evaluation Mechanics -- Chapter 4. Introducing Impact to the Evaluators -- Chapter 5. Peers, Experts and Impact -- Chapter 6. Risking Groupthink in Impact Assessment -- Chapter 7. Working Smarter with Multiple Impacts and One Eye.
520 $a This book offers an empirical analysis of how academic peer review panels mediate the traditionally non-academic criterion of societal impact. The UK's 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF2014) for the first time included an "Impact" criterion that considered how research had influenced society, beyond academia. Using a series of interviews with REF2014 Main Panel A evaluators, the book explores how a dominant definition of Impact was constructed within panels and how this led to the development of strategies around valuing it as an ambiguous object. By doing so, Derrick brings a unique perspective to Impact that is currently overlooked in the dominant Impact evaluation discourse. Through examining the evaluation procedure as a dynamic process it is argued that the best models, strategies and insights for Impact evaluation are those constructed in practice, within peer review groups. By exploring the legitimacy of peer review as a tool to assess the societal impact of research, Derrick states that the future for Impact evaluation is not to seek alternative tools where peer review seemingly fails, but instead to highlight ways in which peer review panels can work smarter. The book will be essential reading for students, academics and policy-makers working in Education, as well as researchers interested in peer review processes and the research evaluation frameworks and audit exercises globally.
650 0 $a Scholarly publishing. $3 258526
650 0 $a Peer review. $3 242936
650 1 4 $a Higher Education. $3 276621
650 2 4 $a Assessment, Testing and Evaluation. $3 274753
650 2 4 $a Educational Policy and Politics. $3 308819
650 2 4 $a Administration, Organization and Leadership. $3 339614
650 2 4 $a Teaching and Teacher Education. $3 338703
650 2 4 $a Research Methods in Education. $3 772096
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63627-6
950 $a Education (Springer-41171)