國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Crooked thinking or straight talk?mo...

Binmore, Ken.

Crooked thinking or straight talk?modernizing epicurean scientific philosophy /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Crooked thinking or straight talk?by Ken Binmore.
其他題名:	modernizing epicurean scientific philosophy /
作者:	Binmore, Ken.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020.
面頁冊數:	x, 130 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Philosophy.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39547-6
ISBN:	9783030395476$q(electronic bk.)

Crooked thinking or straight talk?modernizing epicurean scientific philosophy /
Binmore, Ken.

Crooked thinking or straight talk?modernizing epicurean scientific philosophy /[electronic resource] :by Ken Binmore. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020. - x, 130 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Epicurus -- Rationality as Consistency -- Valuing Lives -- Reciprocity -- Fairness.

Why can't we think straight about the big issues that face our society? Why are we taken in by the phony arguments of populists and scammers? Where are the philosophers hiding when we need them to tell us what makes sense? They are hiding because they have nothing to say. The airy-fairy answers offered by writers of footnotes to Plato were wrong two thousand years ago, and they are still wrong now. All this time, we should have been listening to a different but equally venerable branch of matter-of-fact philosophy pioneered by the much-maligned philosopher Epicurus. His ideas were suppressed in ancient times as heretical, but the development of the theory of games and decisions makes it timely for those of us who care about science to revive his style of thinking-not just about the world around us but about ourselves as well. The price of transferring our allegiance to Epicurus and his modern followers is that we can no longer enjoy the luxury of being told what we want to hear. It would be nice if we were really equipped with a hotline to a metaphysical world of transcendental ideals, but the truth is that we are just the flotsam left behind on the beach when the evolutionary tide went out, and we have to get real about what will and will not work for our imperfect species before it is too late. This book is an attempt to point the way. It has no equations and very little jargon; nor does it pull any punches, either in explaining how game theory works or in exposing the follies of famous metaphysicians.

ISBN: 9783030395476$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-39547-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

176573
Philosophy.

LC Class. No.: B29 / .B566 2020

Dewey Class. No.: 102

Crooked thinking or straight talk?modernizing epicurean scientific philosophy /
LDR:02592nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 573496
003 DE-He213
005 20200618162302.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 200928s2020 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030395476$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030395469$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-39547-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-39547-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a B29 $b .B566 2020
072 7 $a PBUD $2 bicssc
072 7 $a MAT011000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a PBUD $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 102 $2 23
090 $a B29 $b .B613 2020
100 1 $a Binmore, Ken. $3 860818
245 1 0 $a Crooked thinking or straight talk? $h [electronic resource] : $b modernizing epicurean scientific philosophy / $c by Ken Binmore.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2020.
300 $a x, 130 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Epicurus -- Rationality as Consistency -- Valuing Lives -- Reciprocity -- Fairness.
520 $a Why can't we think straight about the big issues that face our society? Why are we taken in by the phony arguments of populists and scammers? Where are the philosophers hiding when we need them to tell us what makes sense? They are hiding because they have nothing to say. The airy-fairy answers offered by writers of footnotes to Plato were wrong two thousand years ago, and they are still wrong now. All this time, we should have been listening to a different but equally venerable branch of matter-of-fact philosophy pioneered by the much-maligned philosopher Epicurus. His ideas were suppressed in ancient times as heretical, but the development of the theory of games and decisions makes it timely for those of us who care about science to revive his style of thinking-not just about the world around us but about ourselves as well. The price of transferring our allegiance to Epicurus and his modern followers is that we can no longer enjoy the luxury of being told what we want to hear. It would be nice if we were really equipped with a hotline to a metaphysical world of transcendental ideals, but the truth is that we are just the flotsam left behind on the beach when the evolutionary tide went out, and we have to get real about what will and will not work for our imperfect species before it is too late. This book is an attempt to point the way. It has no equations and very little jargon; nor does it pull any punches, either in explaining how game theory works or in exposing the follies of famous metaphysicians.
650 0 $a Philosophy. $3 176573
650 0 $a Science $x Philosophy. $3 179415
650 1 4 $a Game Theory. $3 737094
650 2 4 $a Classical Philosophy. $3 277160
650 2 4 $a Game Theory, Economics, Social and Behav. Sciences. $3 274083
650 2 4 $a Behavioral/Experimental Economics. $3 737421
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39547-6
950 $a Economics and Finance (Springer-41170)