國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., pragmatis...

Holmes, Oliver Wendell, (Jr.,) (1841-1935.)

Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., pragmatism and neuroscience

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., pragmatism and neuroscienceby Jay Schulkin.
作者:	Schulkin, Jay.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019.
面頁冊數:	xi, 355 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	LawUnited States.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2
ISBN:	9783030231002$q(electronic bk.)

Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., pragmatism and neuroscience
Schulkin, Jay.

Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., pragmatism and neuroscience[electronic resource] /by Jay Schulkin. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019. - xi, 355 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. Introduction -- 2. Holmes' Critical Experience in War -- 3. Experience, Inference and Surviving -- 4. Holmes, Pragmatism and Nature -- 5. Duty, Surviving, Social Contract -- 6. Emersonian Sensibilities -- 7. Bounded Choice, Human Freedom and Problem Solving -- 8. Naturalizing Decision-Making -- 9. Ethics, Body Politic, and Neuroscience -- 10. Neuroscientific Considerations and the Law -- 11. Conclusion.

This book explores the cultures of philosophy and the law as they interact with neuroscience and biology, through the perspective of American jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes' Jr., and the pragmatist tradition of John Dewey. Schulkin proposes that human problem solving and the law are tied to a naturalistic, realistic and an anthropological understanding of the human condition. The situated character of legal reasoning, given its complexity, like reasoning in neuroscience, can be notoriously fallible. Legal and scientific reasoning is to be understood within a broader context in order to emphasize both the continuity and the porous relationship between the two. Some facts of neuroscience fit easily into discussions of human experience and the law. However, it is important not to oversell neuroscience: a meeting of law and neuroscience is unlikely to prove persuasive in the courtroom any time soon. Nevertheless, as knowledge of neuroscience becomes more reliable and more easily accepted by both the larger legislative community and in the wider public, through which neuroscience filters into epistemic and judicial reliability, the two will ultimately find themselves in front of a judge. A pragmatist view of neuroscience will aid and underlie these events.

ISBN: 9783030231002$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2doiSubjects--Personal Names:

878923
Holmes, Oliver Wendell,
Jr.,1841-1935.Subjects--Topical Terms:

187992
Law
--United States.

LC Class. No.: KF387 / .S34 2019

Dewey Class. No.: 340

Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., pragmatism and neuroscience
LDR:02650nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 587349
003 DE-He213
005 20200703174611.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 210326s2019 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030231002$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030230999$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-23100-2
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KF387 $b .S34 2019
072 7 $a HPCF $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI020000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDHR $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 340 $2 23
090 $a KF387 $b .S386 2019
100 1 $a Schulkin, Jay. $3 275168
245 1 0 $a Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., pragmatism and neuroscience $h [electronic resource] / $c by Jay Schulkin.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2019.
300 $a xi, 355 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- 2. Holmes' Critical Experience in War -- 3. Experience, Inference and Surviving -- 4. Holmes, Pragmatism and Nature -- 5. Duty, Surviving, Social Contract -- 6. Emersonian Sensibilities -- 7. Bounded Choice, Human Freedom and Problem Solving -- 8. Naturalizing Decision-Making -- 9. Ethics, Body Politic, and Neuroscience -- 10. Neuroscientific Considerations and the Law -- 11. Conclusion.
520 $a This book explores the cultures of philosophy and the law as they interact with neuroscience and biology, through the perspective of American jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes' Jr., and the pragmatist tradition of John Dewey. Schulkin proposes that human problem solving and the law are tied to a naturalistic, realistic and an anthropological understanding of the human condition. The situated character of legal reasoning, given its complexity, like reasoning in neuroscience, can be notoriously fallible. Legal and scientific reasoning is to be understood within a broader context in order to emphasize both the continuity and the porous relationship between the two. Some facts of neuroscience fit easily into discussions of human experience and the law. However, it is important not to oversell neuroscience: a meeting of law and neuroscience is unlikely to prove persuasive in the courtroom any time soon. Nevertheless, as knowledge of neuroscience becomes more reliable and more easily accepted by both the larger legislative community and in the wider public, through which neuroscience filters into epistemic and judicial reliability, the two will ultimately find themselves in front of a judge. A pragmatist view of neuroscience will aid and underlie these events.
600 1 0 $a Holmes, Oliver Wendell, $c Jr., $d 1841-1935. $3 878923
650 0 $a Law $z United States. $3 187992
650 0 $a Judges $z United States. $3 251224
650 1 4 $a Pragmatism. $3 187963
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Law. $3 274769
650 2 4 $a Political Philosophy. $3 273774
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 557741
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Mind. $3 276634
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)