國立高雄大學圖資館 |

登入

回首頁

Rebel Group Compliance with International Humanitarian Law and Foreign State Sponsorship.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rebel Group Compliance with International Humanitarian Law and Foreign State Sponsorship.
作者:	Read, Hannah Roesch.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022
面頁冊數:	120 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.
附註:	Advisor: Hillebrecht, Courtney.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-03A.
標題:	International law.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29321053
ISBN:	9798841726012

Rebel Group Compliance with International Humanitarian Law and Foreign State Sponsorship.
Read, Hannah Roesch.

Rebel Group Compliance with International Humanitarian Law and Foreign State Sponsorship. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 120 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Providing assistance to rebel groups enables foreign governments to become indirectly involved in conflicts, minimizing investments of blood and treasure, as well as the risk of coming into direct conflict with the rebel group’s target. However, democracies may be susceptible to public backlash if they back rebel groups that defy human rights norms, such as by violating international humanitarian law (IHL). This three-article dissertation analyzes the relationship between rebel behavior and sponsorship decisions both by comparing sponsorship models for democracies and autocracies, as well as examining sub-state influences on democracies’ sponsorship decisions. Through analysis of a cross-national dyadic dataset, I find that, in the aggregate, sponsorship decisions by democracies and autocracies are motivated by geopolitical concerns and that democracies do not systematically condition support on rebel behavior. By examining public opinion in the United States with a survey experiment, I find that citizens themselves are only more disproving of U.S. support for rebels that target civilians when respondents perceive a conflict to be of trivial importance for the U.S.’s national security. Building upon these findings, I conduct a case study of the 2011 decision by the U.S. to assist the Libyan opposition in its attempt to overthrow the Qaddafi regime. The results of this analysis indicate that democracies are more likely to condition support on rebel behavior when the conflict is human rights-oriented, illustrating the need to consider the goals and the covert or overt nature of interventions in future rebel sponsorship research. The overarching implications of this research are that democracies behave much like autocracies in their rebel sponsorship decisions when under threat and when their actions are less likely to draw public scrutiny. However, democracies may be more likely to assist rebels that respect human rights norms when conflicts are framed as humanitarian and carried out under the public eye by multilateral coalitions.

ISBN: 9798841726012Subjects--Topical Terms:

174617
International law.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Civil war

Rebel Group Compliance with International Humanitarian Law and Foreign State Sponsorship.
LDR:03405nmm a2200433 4500 001 636158
005 20230501063914.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 230724s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798841726012
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29321053
035 $a AAI29321053
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Read, Hannah Roesch. $3 942528
245 1 0 $a Rebel Group Compliance with International Humanitarian Law and Foreign State Sponsorship.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 120 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Hillebrecht, Courtney.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Providing assistance to rebel groups enables foreign governments to become indirectly involved in conflicts, minimizing investments of blood and treasure, as well as the risk of coming into direct conflict with the rebel group’s target. However, democracies may be susceptible to public backlash if they back rebel groups that defy human rights norms, such as by violating international humanitarian law (IHL). This three-article dissertation analyzes the relationship between rebel behavior and sponsorship decisions both by comparing sponsorship models for democracies and autocracies, as well as examining sub-state influences on democracies’ sponsorship decisions. Through analysis of a cross-national dyadic dataset, I find that, in the aggregate, sponsorship decisions by democracies and autocracies are motivated by geopolitical concerns and that democracies do not systematically condition support on rebel behavior. By examining public opinion in the United States with a survey experiment, I find that citizens themselves are only more disproving of U.S. support for rebels that target civilians when respondents perceive a conflict to be of trivial importance for the U.S.’s national security. Building upon these findings, I conduct a case study of the 2011 decision by the U.S. to assist the Libyan opposition in its attempt to overthrow the Qaddafi regime. The results of this analysis indicate that democracies are more likely to condition support on rebel behavior when the conflict is human rights-oriented, illustrating the need to consider the goals and the covert or overt nature of interventions in future rebel sponsorship research. The overarching implications of this research are that democracies behave much like autocracies in their rebel sponsorship decisions when under threat and when their actions are less likely to draw public scrutiny. However, democracies may be more likely to assist rebels that respect human rights norms when conflicts are framed as humanitarian and carried out under the public eye by multilateral coalitions.
590 $a School code: 0138.
650 4 $a International law. $3 174617
650 4 $a Political science. $3 174710
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 280699
653 $a Civil war
653 $a Civilian casualties
653 $a International humanitarian law
653 $a Public opinion
653 $a Rebel groups
653 $a Rebel sponsorship
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a The University of Nebraska - Lincoln. $b Political Science. $3 942529
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-03A.
790 $a 0138
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29321053