國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Making votes not count: Strategic in...

Simpser, Alberto.

Making votes not count: Strategic incentives for electoral corruption.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Making votes not count: Strategic incentives for electoral corruption.
Author:	Simpser, Alberto.
Description:	172 p.
Notes:	Adviser: Alberto Diaz-Cayeros.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-08, Section: A, page: 3083.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-08A.
Subject:	Political Science, General.
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3186402
ISBN:	9780542286957

Making votes not count: Strategic incentives for electoral corruption.
Simpser, Alberto.

Making votes not count: Strategic incentives for electoral corruption. - 172 p.

Adviser: Alberto Diaz-Cayeros.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2005.

In many developing countries, the institution of elections differs systematically from the idealized view of elections embodied in most current political economy work, with important consequences for accountability and governance. I study the incentives underlying corrupt elections. I begin by showing that the obvious view, namely that the goal of electoral corruption is to change who wins, cannot account for an important part of the empirical incidence of corrupt elections. The conventional wisdom associates electoral corruption with close contests and with small margins of victory. The logic is that electoral corruption is costly and risky and therefore should be pursued only insofar as it can change the outcome of the election, and only to the extent necessary to win. In fact, however, corrupt elections are often associated with overwhelming victory. In light of existing ideas on electoral corruption this is puzzling: Why engage excessively in the costly practice of electoral corruption? I propose an answer based on the informational effects of electoral corruption. The key insight is that electoral corruption can play a critical role in suppressing political competition not only mechanically through, for example, the direct alteration of ballots but also, less intuitively, by influencing beliefs and expectations about the political process. The belief, for example, that the opposition stands no chance of winning can discourage opposition turnout. A powerful incumbent, such as Mexico's PRI in the twentieth century, may thus benefit from manipulating citizens' beliefs through public acts of electoral corruption or by establishing a precedent of corrupt and/or overwhelming victory. The informational mechanism is especially important in developing democracies, where the electoral playing field, while competitive, is often tilted in favor of powerful incumbents. I use a game-theoretic model to explore the conditions under which informational incentives give rise to electoral corruption as equilibrium behavior. I test observable implications of these ideas using a panel of 88 countries in the period 1975--2000 with an original measure of electoral corruption. I also use individual-level survey data to test the relationship between beliefs and turnout. I discuss my findings in light of recent elections in Venezuela, Mexico, and Ukraine.

ISBN: 9780542286957Subjects--Topical Terms:

212408
Political Science, General.

Making votes not count: Strategic incentives for electoral corruption.
LDR:03313nmm _2200253 _450 001 170723
005 20061228142228.5
008 090528s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542286957
035 $a 00242753
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 0 $a Simpser, Alberto. $3 244752
245 1 0 $a Making votes not count: Strategic incentives for electoral corruption.
300 $a 172 p.
500 $a Adviser: Alberto Diaz-Cayeros.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-08, Section: A, page: 3083.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2005.
520 # $a In many developing countries, the institution of elections differs systematically from the idealized view of elections embodied in most current political economy work, with important consequences for accountability and governance. I study the incentives underlying corrupt elections. I begin by showing that the obvious view, namely that the goal of electoral corruption is to change who wins, cannot account for an important part of the empirical incidence of corrupt elections. The conventional wisdom associates electoral corruption with close contests and with small margins of victory. The logic is that electoral corruption is costly and risky and therefore should be pursued only insofar as it can change the outcome of the election, and only to the extent necessary to win. In fact, however, corrupt elections are often associated with overwhelming victory. In light of existing ideas on electoral corruption this is puzzling: Why engage excessively in the costly practice of electoral corruption? I propose an answer based on the informational effects of electoral corruption. The key insight is that electoral corruption can play a critical role in suppressing political competition not only mechanically through, for example, the direct alteration of ballots but also, less intuitively, by influencing beliefs and expectations about the political process. The belief, for example, that the opposition stands no chance of winning can discourage opposition turnout. A powerful incumbent, such as Mexico's PRI in the twentieth century, may thus benefit from manipulating citizens' beliefs through public acts of electoral corruption or by establishing a precedent of corrupt and/or overwhelming victory. The informational mechanism is especially important in developing democracies, where the electoral playing field, while competitive, is often tilted in favor of powerful incumbents. I use a game-theoretic model to explore the conditions under which informational incentives give rise to electoral corruption as equilibrium behavior. I test observable implications of these ideas using a panel of 88 countries in the period 1975--2000 with an original measure of electoral corruption. I also use individual-level survey data to test the relationship between beliefs and turnout. I discuss my findings in light of recent elections in Venezuela, Mexico, and Ukraine.
590 $a School code: 0212.
650 # 0 $a Political Science, General. $3 212408
690 $a 0615
710 0 # $a Stanford University. $3 212607
773 0 # $g 66-08A. $t Dissertation Abstracts International
790 $a 0212
790 1 0 $a Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://libsw.nuk.edu.tw:81/login?url=http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3186402 $z http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3186402