國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

中國與印度銀行之群體績效評估 = Group Performance E...

國立高雄大學經營管理研究所

中國與印度銀行之群體績效評估 = Group Performance Evaluation of China and India Banking Industry

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	Group Performance Evaluation of China and India Banking Industry
作者:	林孟熙,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2009[民98]
面頁冊數:	58面圖、表 : 30公分;
標題:	DEA
標題:	Banking
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/70468292259828145582
附註:	參考書目：面
附註:	指導教授：李揚
摘要註:	銀行產業在一國的經濟活動中，扮演重要金融中介的角色，其存在不僅可以使資金活絡、提高資金融通效率，同時亦可加速資本累積，促進經濟成長。中國與印度兩個亞洲發展中的大國，近年來在經濟上亮眼的表現引起各方學者的注意，在Chindia概念下，中、印雙方除了經貿合作越來越密切外，兩國在金融方面的交流也很熱絡，促使本文想去探討兩國銀行產業之間差異，並衡量兩國的銀行產業的績效。本研究以中國和印度兩國商業銀行為研究樣本，收集2004-2006年Bankscope資料庫的資料，應用雙曲線距離函數並結合Camanho and Dyson(2006)發展的群體績效指數，在假設規模報酬變動下，將群體效率值分解成群體內效率分散、群體內規模效率之分布程度和兩群體間生產前緣之生產力差距三部份來對中、印兩國銀行績效作比較和探討。實證研究結果顯示，印度銀行整體效率優於中國銀行，其主要原因在於印度銀行的群體間生產效率前緣和群體內規模效率優於中國銀行。在利用VRS假設下應用產出距離函數估計時，約有2.6%的觀測值出現無解的狀況，若應用雙曲線距離函數則可解決無解的問題；兩群體之生產前緣有相交的情形，表示印度銀行之群體生產力並未完全優於中國銀行；另外中、印兩國銀行觀測值大多落在各自具有生產力的生產前緣內生產，顯示兩國銀行以經找到各自適合的利基點上發展。 Banking industry play important finance intermediary role in a country's economic activity, banking can make funding liquidity, promoting the economic growth. China and India are two of the developing countries in Asia. Recently, China and India’s great economic performance makes China and India become crucial players in the world economy. Many researchers in different fields want to research China and India economy from multiple perspectives. Under the concept of “Chindia”, China and India not only have close relationship of cooperation in economy and trade, but the frequent financial interflow between China and India, it make this study to discuss the difference of supporting factor in these two countries. Banking industry is one of important factor to promoting economy, in this study we use the hyperbolic distance function combine Chamaho and Dyson (2006) group performance index to measure Chinese and Indian banking industry’s group performance. The analysis involves the construction of an index reflecting the relative performance of Chinese and Indian banking industry , which can be decomposed into an index for the comparison of within-group efficiency spread, an index for the comparison of frontier productivity and the group scale efficiency. Results show that India banking industry’s group performance is better than Chinese banking industry. The main factors is Indian banking industry’s group index for the comparison of frontier productivity and the group scale efficiency are better than Chinese banking industry. Otherwise, the study use output distance function under VRS assumption to measure Chinese and Indian banking industry, about 2.6% observation show infeasible condition. The problem of infeasible observation could be solved, if we used hyperbolic distance function.

中國與印度銀行之群體績效評估 = Group Performance Evaluation of China and India Banking Industry
林, 孟熙

中國與印度銀行之群體績效評估 = Group Performance Evaluation of China and India Banking Industry / 林孟熙撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2009[民98]. - 58面 ; 圖、表 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面指導教授：李揚.
DEABanking

中國與印度銀行之群體績效評估 = Group Performance Evaluation of China and India Banking Industry
LDR:04476nam a2200277 4500 001 220396
005 20170214090558.0
009 220396
010 0 $b 平裝
010 0 $b 精裝
100 $a 20170214d k y0chiy50
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 中國與印度銀行之群體績效評估 $d Group Performance Evaluation of China and India Banking Industry $z eng $f 林孟熙撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2009[民98]
215 0 $a 58面 $c 圖、表 $d 30公分
300 $a 參考書目：面
300 $a 指導教授：李揚
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學經營管理研究所
330 $a 銀行產業在一國的經濟活動中，扮演重要金融中介的角色，其存在不僅可以使資金活絡、提高資金融通效率，同時亦可加速資本累積，促進經濟成長。中國與印度兩個亞洲發展中的大國，近年來在經濟上亮眼的表現引起各方學者的注意，在Chindia概念下，中、印雙方除了經貿合作越來越密切外，兩國在金融方面的交流也很熱絡，促使本文想去探討兩國銀行產業之間差異，並衡量兩國的銀行產業的績效。本研究以中國和印度兩國商業銀行為研究樣本，收集2004-2006年Bankscope資料庫的資料，應用雙曲線距離函數並結合Camanho and Dyson(2006)發展的群體績效指數，在假設規模報酬變動下，將群體效率值分解成群體內效率分散、群體內規模效率之分布程度和兩群體間生產前緣之生產力差距三部份來對中、印兩國銀行績效作比較和探討。實證研究結果顯示，印度銀行整體效率優於中國銀行，其主要原因在於印度銀行的群體間生產效率前緣和群體內規模效率優於中國銀行。在利用VRS假設下應用產出距離函數估計時，約有2.6%的觀測值出現無解的狀況，若應用雙曲線距離函數則可解決無解的問題；兩群體之生產前緣有相交的情形，表示印度銀行之群體生產力並未完全優於中國銀行；另外中、印兩國銀行觀測值大多落在各自具有生產力的生產前緣內生產，顯示兩國銀行以經找到各自適合的利基點上發展。 Banking industry play important finance intermediary role in a country's economic activity, banking can make funding liquidity, promoting the economic growth. China and India are two of the developing countries in Asia. Recently, China and India’s great economic performance makes China and India become crucial players in the world economy. Many researchers in different fields want to research China and India economy from multiple perspectives. Under the concept of “Chindia”, China and India not only have close relationship of cooperation in economy and trade, but the frequent financial interflow between China and India, it make this study to discuss the difference of supporting factor in these two countries. Banking industry is one of important factor to promoting economy, in this study we use the hyperbolic distance function combine Chamaho and Dyson (2006) group performance index to measure Chinese and Indian banking industry’s group performance. The analysis involves the construction of an index reflecting the relative performance of Chinese and Indian banking industry , which can be decomposed into an index for the comparison of within-group efficiency spread, an index for the comparison of frontier productivity and the group scale efficiency. Results show that India banking industry’s group performance is better than Chinese banking industry. The main factors is Indian banking industry’s group index for the comparison of frontier productivity and the group scale efficiency are better than Chinese banking industry. Otherwise, the study use output distance function under VRS assumption to measure Chinese and Indian banking industry, about 2.6% observation show infeasible condition. The problem of infeasible observation could be solved, if we used hyperbolic distance function.
510 1 $a Group Performance Evaluation of China and India Banking Industry $z eng
610 0 $a DEA $a 群體績效 $a 銀行 $a 雙曲線距離函數
610 1 $a Banking $a Data Envelopment Analysis $a Group Efficiency $a Hyperbolic Distance Function
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 301208 4417 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 林 $b 孟熙 $4 撰 $3 354060
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 經營管理研究所 $3 170850
801 0 $a tw $b 國立高雄大學 $c 20091020 $g CCR
856 7 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/70468292259828145582