國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Restoration and retribution: People'...

Gromet, Dena M.

Restoration and retribution: People's negotiation of multiple responses to wrongdoing.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Restoration and retribution: People's negotiation of multiple responses to wrongdoing.
Author:	Gromet, Dena M.
Description:	198 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-04, Section: B, page: 2614.
Notes:	Adviser: John M. Darley.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-04B.
Subject:	Psychology, Social.
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3356714
ISBN:	9781109133196

Restoration and retribution: People's negotiation of multiple responses to wrongdoing.
Gromet, Dena M.

Restoration and retribution: People's negotiation of multiple responses to wrongdoing. - 198 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-04, Section: B, page: 2614.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2009.

The present research investigated the situational and chronic factors that influence people's preferences for restoration and retribution in response to wrongdoing. In Chapter I, I examined how offense severity affects people's desire to accomplish restoration (i.e., repairing the harm caused by wrongdoing) alongside retribution (i.e., addressing the wrong itself). The results demonstrated that as offense severity increases, people prefer procedures that include both restorative and retributive elements, rather than purely restorative or purely retributive procedures. These findings suggest that people are interested in satisfying multiple justice goals.

ISBN: 9781109133196Subjects--Topical Terms:

177541
Psychology, Social.

Restoration and retribution: People's negotiation of multiple responses to wrongdoing.
LDR:03528nmm 2200313 4500 001 240205
005 20100310090821.5
008 100410s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109133196
035 $a (UMI)AAI3356714
035 $a AAI3356714
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Gromet, Dena M. $3 384232
245 1 0 $a Restoration and retribution: People's negotiation of multiple responses to wrongdoing.
300 $a 198 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-04, Section: B, page: 2614.
500 $a Adviser: John M. Darley.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2009.
520 $a The present research investigated the situational and chronic factors that influence people's preferences for restoration and retribution in response to wrongdoing. In Chapter I, I examined how offense severity affects people's desire to accomplish restoration (i.e., repairing the harm caused by wrongdoing) alongside retribution (i.e., addressing the wrong itself). The results demonstrated that as offense severity increases, people prefer procedures that include both restorative and retributive elements, rather than purely restorative or purely retributive procedures. These findings suggest that people are interested in satisfying multiple justice goals.
520 $a In Chapter II, I investigated how the salience of different justice targets (e.g., offender vs. victim) affects people's preferences for achieving justice goals beyond punishment. Although participants' default response to wrongdoing was to punish the offender, they viewed additional justice goals as necessary when their attention was drawn to the victim or the community. These findings further demonstrate that people have both restorative and retributive justice goals, which are differentially activated by salient situational factors.
520 $a In Chapter III, I investigated how one chronic factor, political identification, is associated with people's preferences for restoration and retribution. Liberals and conservatives were found to have different responses to wrongdoing, such that conservatives were less in favor of restoration, and more in favor of retribution, than liberals (with moral outrage mediating this relationship). Moreover, when victims were made salient, and when participants' cognitive resources were taxed, liberals and conservatives' differing orientations toward restoration and retribution were exacerbated (mediated by the perceived likelihood of offender rehabilitation). I also found that people were willing to reduce the degree of retribution toward offenders in order to achieve victim restoration when the conflict between achieving restoration and retribution was salient, and when they equally valued the two goals (determined by political identification). Taken together, these studies illustrate how people's chronic orientations combine with salient situational factors to determine preferences for restoration and retribution.
520 $a One implication of these findings is that people consider restoration and retribution to be compatible, rather than contradictory, justice responses. Policy implications with regard to the inclusion of restoration in criminal justice systems are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0181.
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 177541
650 4 $a Sociology, Criminology and Penology. $3 212412
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0627
710 2 $a Princeton University. $3 212488
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-04B.
790 1 0 $a Darley, John M., $e advisor
790 $a 0181
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3356714