國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Negation in gapping

Repp, Sophie.

Negation in gapping

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Negation in gappingSophie Repp.
Author:	Repp, Sophie.
Published:	Oxford :Oxford University Press,2009.
Description:	xi, 266 p. :ill. ;25 cm.
Subject:	Grammar, Comparative and generalNegatives.
Online resource:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543601.001.0001
ISBN:	9780199543601

Negation in gapping
Repp, Sophie.

Negation in gapping[electronic resource] /Sophie Repp. - Oxford :Oxford University Press,2009. - xi, 266 p. :ill. ;25 cm. - Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics ;22. - Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics ;22..

Includes bibliographical references and index.

The first in-depth investigation of gapping and negation shows accepted accounts do not explain differences across languages, and available readings of the negation. The author questions assumptions in the analysis of gapping and presents a new analysis with implications for the interpretation of scope, and the theory of ellipsis.

Electronic reproduction.
Oxford :
Oxford University Press,
2009.

(Oxford Scholarship Online).

Mode of access: World Wide Web. System requirements: Internet Explorer 6.0 (or higher) or Firefox 2.0 (or higher).

ISBN: 9780199543601 Subjects--Topical Terms:

392768
Grammar, Comparative and general
--Negatives.

LC Class. No.: P299.N4

Dewey Class. No.: 415

Negation in gapping
LDR:01356nmm 2200241 a 4500 001 247751
003 StDuBDS
005 20091105123028.0
006 m||||||||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 100527s2009
020 $a 9780199543601
035 $a OSOUK99543601
040 $a StDuBDS $c StDuBDS
050 4 $a P299.N4
082 0 4 $a 415 $2 22
100 1 $a Repp, Sophie. $3 392766
245 1 0 $a Negation in gapping $h [electronic resource] / $c Sophie Repp.
260 $a Oxford : $b Oxford University Press, $c 2009.
300 $a xi, 266 p. : $b ill. ; $c 25 cm.
490 1 $a Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics ; $v 22
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
520 8 $a The first in-depth investigation of gapping and negation shows accepted accounts do not explain differences across languages, and available readings of the negation. The author questions assumptions in the analysis of gapping and presents a new analysis with implications for the interpretation of scope, and the theory of ellipsis.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Oxford : $c Oxford University Press, $d 2009. $f (Oxford Scholarship Online). $n Mode of access: World Wide Web. System requirements: Internet Explorer 6.0 (or higher) or Firefox 2.0 (or higher). $n Available as searchable text in HTML format. $n Access restricted to subscribing institutions.
650 0 $a Grammar, Comparative and general $x Negatives. $3 392768
650 0 $a Grammar, Comparative and general $x Syntax. $3 179083
830 0 $a Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics ; $v 22. $3 392767
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543601.001.0001