國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Redeploying the statecorporatism, neoliberalism, and coalition politics /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Redeploying the stateHishaam D. Aidi.
Reminder of title:	corporatism, neoliberalism, and coalition politics /
Author:	Aidi, Hishaam D.
Published:	New York :Palgrave Macmillan,2009.
Description:	xii, 246 p. ;22 cm.
Subject:	PrivatizationEgypt.
Online resource:	access to fulltext (Palgrave)
ISBN:	9780230617902

Redeploying the statecorporatism, neoliberalism, and coalition politics /
Aidi, Hishaam D.

Redeploying the statecorporatism, neoliberalism, and coalition politics /[electronic resource] :Hishaam D. Aidi. - 1st ed. - New York :Palgrave Macmillan,2009. - xii, 246 p. ;22 cm.

Includes bibliographical references (p. [211]-241) and index.

The politics of privatization -- State formation, incorporation, political parties : conceptsand theoretical considerations -- The founding moment : elite conflict, coalition formation, and regime consolidation -- The institutional legacies of incorporation : the party-labor alliance on the eve of privatization -- Privatization and the populist-distributive alliance -- Bureaucratic reform and state-business relations -- State-labor relations and public sector reform -- Shifting the statefrom left to right -- Privatization and exclusion.

Why has the Egyptian state, which is more repressive and authoritarian than its Mexican counterpart been unable to overcome the opposition of a labor movement, that is smaller, less organized, and more repressed than the Mexican labor movement? Through agitation or the threat of agitation, Egyptian workers have been able to hinder the reform process,while the Mexican labor movement, which is larger and better organizedwas unable to resist privatization. The Egyptian state's low capacity and isolation is best understood by looking at the founding moment -- or incorporation period of eachregime. The critical distinction betweenMexican and Egyptian incorporation is that in Egypt, the labor movement was depoliticized and attached to the state bureaucracy, while in Mexico, workers were electorally mobilized into a political party. This difference would prove crucial during the reform process, because, socialcontrol in Mexico, exercised through the PRI, was more effective in cooptingopponents and mobilizing urban constituencies for privatization than the control mechanisms of the Egyptian state bureaucracy.

Electronic reproduction.
Basingstoke, England :
Palgrave Macmillan,
2009.

Mode of access:World Wide Web.

ISBN: 9780230617902Subjects--Topical Terms:

461820
Privatization
--Egypt.Index Terms--Genre/Form:

214472
Electronic books.

LC Class. No.: HD4343 / .A79 2009

Dewey Class. No.: 338.962/05

Redeploying the statecorporatism, neoliberalism, and coalition politics /
LDR:02934nmm 2200313Ia 4500 001 260058
003 OCoLC
005 20100709081833.0
006 m d
007 cr cn|
008 100903s2009 nyu sb 001 0 eng d
020 $a 9780230617902
020 $a 0230617905
035 $a (OCoLC)319175635
035 $a ocn319175635
040 $a UKPGM $b eng $c UKPGM
043 $a f-ae--- $a n-mx---
049 $a APTA
050 1 4 $a HD4343 $b .A79 2009
082 0 4 $a 338.962/05 $2 22
100 1 $a Aidi, Hishaam D. $3 461819
245 1 0 $a Redeploying the state $h [electronic resource] : $b corporatism, neoliberalism, and coalition politics / $c Hishaam D. Aidi.
250 $a 1st ed.
260 $a New York : $b Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2009.
300 $a xii, 246 p. ; $c 22 cm.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references (p. [211]-241) and index.
505 0 $a The politics of privatization -- State formation, incorporation, political parties : conceptsand theoretical considerations -- The founding moment : elite conflict, coalition formation, and regime consolidation -- The institutional legacies of incorporation : the party-labor alliance on the eve of privatization -- Privatization and the populist-distributive alliance -- Bureaucratic reform and state-business relations -- State-labor relations and public sector reform -- Shifting the statefrom left to right -- Privatization and exclusion.
520 $a Why has the Egyptian state, which is more repressive and authoritarian than its Mexican counterpart been unable to overcome the opposition of a labor movement, that is smaller, less organized, and more repressed than the Mexican labor movement? Through agitation or the threat of agitation, Egyptian workers have been able to hinder the reform process,while the Mexican labor movement, which is larger and better organizedwas unable to resist privatization. The Egyptian state's low capacity and isolation is best understood by looking at the founding moment -- or incorporation period of eachregime. The critical distinction betweenMexican and Egyptian incorporation is that in Egypt, the labor movement was depoliticized and attached to the state bureaucracy, while in Mexico, workers were electorally mobilized into a political party. This difference would prove crucial during the reform process, because, socialcontrol in Mexico, exercised through the PRI, was more effective in cooptingopponents and mobilizing urban constituencies for privatization than the control mechanisms of the Egyptian state bureaucracy.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Basingstoke, England : $c Palgrave Macmillan, $d 2009. $n Mode of access:World Wide Web. $n System requirements: Web browser. $n Title from title screen (viewed on Apr. 24, 2009). $n Access may be restricted to users at subscribing institutions.
650 0 $a Privatization $z Egypt. $3 461820
650 0 $a Privatization $z Mexico. $3 461821
650 0 $a Corporate state $z Egypt. $3 461822
650 0 $a Corporate state $z Mexico. $3 461823
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local. $3 214472
710 2 $a Palgrave Connect (Online service) $3 459825
776 1 $c Original $z 0230611591 $z 9780230611597 $w (DLC) 2008021594 $w (OCoLC)226357085
856 4 0 $3 Palgrave Connect $u https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780230617902 $z access to fulltext (Palgrave)