國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

我國與德國公務員保障法制之比較分析－以保障對象及救濟類型為中心 = Pr...

國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班

我國與德國公務員保障法制之比較分析－以保障對象及救濟類型為中心 = Protection of The Legal System in China and Germany Comparative Analysis of Civil Service－To Protect the Center of the Object and The Type of Relief

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	Protection of The Legal System in China and Germany Comparative Analysis of Civil Service－To Protect the Center of the Object and The Type of Relief
作者:	簡慧貞,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	民100[2011]
版本:	初版
面頁冊數:	102面圖，表 : 30公分;
標題:	公務人員保障
標題:	Civil Service Protection
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/40521678164012746932
摘要註:	公務人員保障法係於民國85年10月16日施行，其後公務人員保障法大幅修正，條文由35條修正擴增為104條，除刪除再復審之相關規定外，另增訂許多實體上保障內容，新制實施以來，在公務人員保障暨培訓委員會（以下簡稱保訓會）持續不斷的努力下，對提昇我國公務人員權利保障有相當大的貢獻。然而，時至今日，其在適用上亦產生不少爭議問題。隨著政府組織再造、強化政府績效管理及建立政府機關彈性用人的促動下，以公法契約進用之人員如納入保障對象，在公務人員任用法及公務員服務法無法取得一致下，將造成保障範圍不明確性，再則，現行申訴、再申訴及復審救濟類型是否足以因應及保障公務人員權利？以行政訴訟法中訴訟類型實務之探討與德國法制救濟類型之比較作為本次研究中心。 Department of Civil Service Protection Law of the Republic of China has implemented on 16 October 1996. After the Civil Service Protection Act amended substantially, the provisions are amplified and amended from 35 to 104,in addition to delete the relevant provisions of the review,it amended many entities to protect the contents ,since the new system is implemented ,The Civil Service Protection and Training Commission （it's called Protected and Training Council for short）have been striving without stopping.It provided considerable contributions of enhancing the protection of the rights of public servants. However, its application has also generated many controversial issues to date.Because of the restructuring,strengthening management of the government system and performances, and the establishment of government agencies to employ flexibly,the contracts with public law adopted employees as guaranteed objects,but the disagreement between Civil Service Employment Act and Civil Service Act made the guaranteed coverage ambiguously. Furthermore,could the present appeal, the type of complaints and the review the adequacy of relief and protect the right of public servants？We compare type practice of the Administrative Procedure Law of Litigation as the research point this time.

我國與德國公務員保障法制之比較分析－以保障對象及救濟類型為中心 = Protection of The Legal System in China and Germany Comparative Analysis of Civil Service－To Protect the Center of the Object and The Type of Relief
簡, 慧貞

我國與德國公務員保障法制之比較分析－以保障對象及救濟類型為中心 = Protection of The Legal System in China and Germany Comparative Analysis of Civil Service－To Protect the Center of the Object and The Type of Relief / 簡慧貞撰 - 初版. - [高雄市] : 撰者, 民100[2011]. - 102面 ; 圖，表 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面.
公務人員保障Civil Service Protection

我國與德國公務員保障法制之比較分析－以保障對象及救濟類型為中心 = Protection of The Legal System in China and Germany Comparative Analysis of Civil Service－To Protect the Center of the Object and The Type of Relief
LDR:03561nam0a2200289 450 001 282598
005 20170214093037.0
009 282598
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214y2010 k y0chiy50 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 我國與德國公務員保障法制之比較分析－以保障對象及救濟類型為中心 $d Protection of The Legal System in China and Germany Comparative Analysis of Civil Service－To Protect the Center of the Object and The Type of Relief $f 簡慧貞撰
205 $a 初版
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 民100[2011]
215 0 $a 102面 $c 圖，表 $d 30公分
314 $a 指導教授：陳正根博士
320 $a 參考書目：面
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班
330 $a 公務人員保障法係於民國85年10月16日施行，其後公務人員保障法大幅修正，條文由35條修正擴增為104條，除刪除再復審之相關規定外，另增訂許多實體上保障內容，新制實施以來，在公務人員保障暨培訓委員會（以下簡稱保訓會）持續不斷的努力下，對提昇我國公務人員權利保障有相當大的貢獻。然而，時至今日，其在適用上亦產生不少爭議問題。隨著政府組織再造、強化政府績效管理及建立政府機關彈性用人的促動下，以公法契約進用之人員如納入保障對象，在公務人員任用法及公務員服務法無法取得一致下，將造成保障範圍不明確性，再則，現行申訴、再申訴及復審救濟類型是否足以因應及保障公務人員權利？以行政訴訟法中訴訟類型實務之探討與德國法制救濟類型之比較作為本次研究中心。 Department of Civil Service Protection Law of the Republic of China has implemented on 16 October 1996. After the Civil Service Protection Act amended substantially, the provisions are amplified and amended from 35 to 104,in addition to delete the relevant provisions of the review,it amended many entities to protect the contents ,since the new system is implemented ,The Civil Service Protection and Training Commission （it's called Protected and Training Council for short）have been striving without stopping.It provided considerable contributions of enhancing the protection of the rights of public servants. However, its application has also generated many controversial issues to date.Because of the restructuring,strengthening management of the government system and performances, and the establishment of government agencies to employ flexibly,the contracts with public law adopted employees as guaranteed objects,but the disagreement between Civil Service Employment Act and Civil Service Act made the guaranteed coverage ambiguously. Furthermore,could the present appeal, the type of complaints and the review the adequacy of relief and protect the right of public servants？We compare type practice of the Administrative Procedure Law of Litigation as the research point this time.
510 1 $a Protection of The Legal System in China and Germany Comparative Analysis of Civil Service－To Protect the Center of the Object and The Type of Relief $z eng
610 0 $a 公務人員保障 $a 保障制度 $a 申訴 $a 復審 $a 行政處分 $a 懲戒
610 1 $a Civil Service Protection $a Security System $a Compl
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 380101 8852 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 簡 $b 慧貞 $4 撰 $3 495310
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 法律學系碩士班 $3 166036
801 0 $a tw $b 國立高雄大學 $c 20110316 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/40521678164012746932