國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

偏好不確定性、願付價格與實際捐款 = Preference Uncert...

國立高雄大學應用經濟學系碩士班

偏好不確定性、願付價格與實際捐款 = Preference Uncertainty, Willingness to Pay,and Actually Donation

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : monographic
Paralel Title:	Preference Uncertainty, Willingness to Pay,and Actually Donation
Author:	趙聖傑,
Secondary Intellectual Responsibility:	國立高雄大學
Place of Publication:	[高雄市]
Published:	撰者;
Year of Publication:	民100
Description:	40葉圖，表格 : 30公分;
Subject:	條件評估法(CVM)
Subject:	Preference uncertainty
Online resource:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/69485387291984609830
Notes:	參考書目：葉32-33
Summary:	為了比較不確定性的詢問方式對於受訪者選擇的影響，本研究將問卷分為三種詢問方式：(1) 二元選擇，(2) 二元選擇加上不知道，和(3) 多重選擇。本研究以高雄市楠梓區援中國小的家長會經費募捐為例，探討問卷中加入偏好不確定性對於願付價格估計的影響。本研究目的為：(1) 在不同的不確定性表達機會之下，觀察受訪者的選擇行為是否符合需求理論。(2) 在不同的不確定性表達機會之下，比較受訪者的真實捐款的差距。 (3) 比較在不同的詢問方式之下，受訪者的捐款意願與其真實捐款的關係。 (4) 在不同程度的不確定性中，受訪者實際捐款是否有差異。我們的結果指出，當受訪者被賦予表達偏好不確定性的機會時，其偏好不確定性有助於在資料中篩選出能以經濟分析工具解釋其選擇行為，並且估計其願付價格的受訪者。我們發現真實捐款的受訪者中，絕大多數在問卷中表達願意捐款的意願。同時，當受訪者有機會表達其不確定性時，在不同的問卷形式中表達願意捐款的受訪者，其平均真實捐款金額並沒有顯著差異。 We use three question formats to examine the effects of the question formats on respondents’ voting behavior, including (1) a dichotomous choice question, (2) a dichotomous choice question with a “don’t know” option, and (3) a polychotomous choice question. To address these issues, we design an experiment involving contingent donations and actual donations for the Yuan-Chong Elementary School Parents’ Association (YCESPA). We seek to answer these questions: (1) Are respondents’ uncertain responses economically interpretable? (2) Do respondents donate differently within various question formats? (3) Do respondents’ actual donation relate to their responses to the valuation question? (4) Do respondents donate differently if they hold different degree of uncertainty?Our results suggest that, when the opportunity of expressing their preference uncertainty is explicitly provided, the stated degree of preference uncertainty is helpful in differentiating those whose responses are economically interpretable or not. We also find that only those respondents who indicate that they are willing to donate would actually donate. Finally, we find that there is not a significant difference in actual donation amount among these three samples.

偏好不確定性、願付價格與實際捐款 = Preference Uncertainty, Willingness to Pay,and Actually Donation
趙, 聖傑

偏好不確定性、願付價格與實際捐款 = Preference Uncertainty, Willingness to Pay,and Actually Donation / 趙聖傑撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 民100. - 40葉 ; 圖，表格 ; 30公分.
參考書目：葉32-33.
條件評估法(CVM)Preference uncertainty

偏好不確定性、願付價格與實際捐款 = Preference Uncertainty, Willingness to Pay,and Actually Donation
LDR:03615nam0a2200277 450 001 300498
005 20170214094700.0
009 300498
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214d2011 k y0chiy50 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 偏好不確定性、願付價格與實際捐款 $d Preference Uncertainty, Willingness to Pay,and Actually Donation $z eng $f 趙聖傑撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 民100
215 0 $a 40葉 $c 圖，表格 $d 30公分
300 $a 參考書目：葉32-33
314 $a 指導教授：劉志成博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學應用經濟學系碩士班
330 $a 為了比較不確定性的詢問方式對於受訪者選擇的影響，本研究將問卷分為三種詢問方式：(1) 二元選擇，(2) 二元選擇加上不知道，和(3) 多重選擇。本研究以高雄市楠梓區援中國小的家長會經費募捐為例，探討問卷中加入偏好不確定性對於願付價格估計的影響。本研究目的為：(1) 在不同的不確定性表達機會之下，觀察受訪者的選擇行為是否符合需求理論。(2) 在不同的不確定性表達機會之下，比較受訪者的真實捐款的差距。 (3) 比較在不同的詢問方式之下，受訪者的捐款意願與其真實捐款的關係。 (4) 在不同程度的不確定性中，受訪者實際捐款是否有差異。我們的結果指出，當受訪者被賦予表達偏好不確定性的機會時，其偏好不確定性有助於在資料中篩選出能以經濟分析工具解釋其選擇行為，並且估計其願付價格的受訪者。我們發現真實捐款的受訪者中，絕大多數在問卷中表達願意捐款的意願。同時，當受訪者有機會表達其不確定性時，在不同的問卷形式中表達願意捐款的受訪者，其平均真實捐款金額並沒有顯著差異。 We use three question formats to examine the effects of the question formats on respondents’ voting behavior, including (1) a dichotomous choice question, (2) a dichotomous choice question with a “don’t know” option, and (3) a polychotomous choice question. To address these issues, we design an experiment involving contingent donations and actual donations for the Yuan-Chong Elementary School Parents’ Association (YCESPA). We seek to answer these questions: (1) Are respondents’ uncertain responses economically interpretable? (2) Do respondents donate differently within various question formats? (3) Do respondents’ actual donation relate to their responses to the valuation question? (4) Do respondents donate differently if they hold different degree of uncertainty?Our results suggest that, when the opportunity of expressing their preference uncertainty is explicitly provided, the stated degree of preference uncertainty is helpful in differentiating those whose responses are economically interpretable or not. We also find that only those respondents who indicate that they are willing to donate would actually donate. Finally, we find that there is not a significant difference in actual donation amount among these three samples.
510 1 $a Preference Uncertainty, Willingness to Pay,and Actually Donation $z eng
610 0 $a 條件評估法(CVM) $a 偏好不確定性 $a 願付價格 $a 真實捐款
610 1 $a Preference uncertainty $a Willingness to Pay $a Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) $a Actual Donation
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 301206 4912 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 趙 $b 聖傑 $4 撰 $3 518886
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 應用經濟學系碩士班 $3 353959
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20111102 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/69485387291984609830