國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

警察強制措施之合法性研究 = The Study on the Lega...

國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班

警察強制措施之合法性研究 = The Study on the Legality of Coercive Measure Made by Police：focusing on the Active Criminal : 以現行犯之逮捕為中心

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	The Study on the Legality of Coercive Measure Made by Police：focusing on the Active Criminal
副題名:	以現行犯之逮捕為中心
作者:	陳玲君,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2012[民101]
面頁冊數:	168面30公分;
標題:	警察強制措施
標題:	police coercive measure
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/48599683841334979104
附註:	參考書目：面162-164
其他題名:	以現行犯之逮捕為中心
摘要註:	警察為達成法定任務，依法得採取各種警察職權，而警察職權依其作用方式大致上可區分為由警察機關所為之發布警察命令、作成違警處分，及由警察人員執行各類警察強制措施及其他業務處理事項等。其中警察強制措施，依警察治安維護任務中刑事犯行追緝及行政危害防止之分類，亦區分為刑事強制處分及行政強制措施，因警察實務所遭遇常屬偶發、變動、急迫之狀況，可能含括刑事不法、行政不法甚或民事不法，且相關措施之行使涉及人民自由權利之干預，故其合法性問題不容忽視。本論文研究之目的即在嘗試建立警察執法正確觀念以減少違法疏誤可能導致之刑事、行政、民事及國家賠償責任問題。本論文以執行極為頻繁之警察強制措施－「現行犯逮捕」為中心，先從國內外相關文獻資料之蒐集與整理，瞭解警察強制措施之概念、區分及合法性判斷問題，進而比較「刑事犯罪現行犯之逮捕」、「現行違反行政法上義務行為人之處置」、「警察職權行使法之身分查證」等不同干預程度之警察強制措施本質上區分，及探討有關現行犯逮捕之相關法制與實務問題，兼並論及警察強制措施救濟制度及相關責任。本論文期藉由對於現行犯逮捕等警察強制措施之研究，提出執行警察強制措施應具備之基本法律觀念及具體執法建議，以助於正確適用法令提升執法品質，避免違法疏誤導致侵害人權衍生相關責任問題，並期達到人權保障及治安維護雙贏的局面。 Police, including law enforcement organization and officers, is authorized to utilize a variety of methods to achieve legal tasks. In general, police organization establishes standardized procedure or normative regulation. Police officers enforce laws or regulations in the specific cases, using coercive or non-coercive measures. Coercive measure, including criminal and administrative is the most invasive action that violates the people's freedom and property. The legality issue should be taken into serious consideration. While dealing with street-level situations, police is often confronted with chaos involving criminal law-violated, administrative law-violated and civil law-violated. The study aims to set up an accurate law-enforcing procedure to decrease inappropriate treatment that might cause criminal, administrative, civil or national indemnity liability.The article focuses on the arrest in flagrante delicto of Taiwan as an example of police criminal coercion. Through literature review, this article introduces the theory and concept of coercive measures. Besides, this article compares three situations-“arrest in flagrante delicto “, “enforcement measure on the administrative law violated’, and “identity inspection” to clarify different interference, remedy system and responsibility. By looking at the normative measures and police practices surrounding arrest in flagrante delicto, the study tries to provide basic legal knowledge and advices for law-enforcement officers while using coercive measures. Meanwhile, properly utilizing laws will improve law-enforcement quality and avoid chances of ignorance. This way, the protection of human rights and society security could be achieved at the same time.

警察強制措施之合法性研究 = The Study on the Legality of Coercive Measure Made by Police：focusing on the Active Criminal : 以現行犯之逮捕為中心
陳, 玲君

警察強制措施之合法性研究 = The Study on the Legality of Coercive Measure Made by Police：focusing on the Active Criminal : 以現行犯之逮捕為中心 / 陳玲君撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2012[民101]. - 168面 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面162-164.
警察強制措施police coercive measure

警察強制措施之合法性研究 = The Study on the Legality of Coercive Measure Made by Police：focusing on the Active Criminal : 以現行犯之逮捕為中心
LDR:04830nam0a2200289 450 001 346033
005 20230622155246.0
009 346033
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20121108d2012 k y0chiy05 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a y am 000yy
200 1 $a 警察強制措施之合法性研究 $e 以現行犯之逮捕為中心 $d The Study on the Legality of Coercive Measure Made by Police：focusing on the Active Criminal $z eng $f 陳玲君撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2012[民101]
215 0 $a 168面 $d 30公分
300 $a 參考書目：面162-164
314 $a 指導教授：陳正根博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班
330 $a 警察為達成法定任務，依法得採取各種警察職權，而警察職權依其作用方式大致上可區分為由警察機關所為之發布警察命令、作成違警處分，及由警察人員執行各類警察強制措施及其他業務處理事項等。其中警察強制措施，依警察治安維護任務中刑事犯行追緝及行政危害防止之分類，亦區分為刑事強制處分及行政強制措施，因警察實務所遭遇常屬偶發、變動、急迫之狀況，可能含括刑事不法、行政不法甚或民事不法，且相關措施之行使涉及人民自由權利之干預，故其合法性問題不容忽視。本論文研究之目的即在嘗試建立警察執法正確觀念以減少違法疏誤可能導致之刑事、行政、民事及國家賠償責任問題。本論文以執行極為頻繁之警察強制措施－「現行犯逮捕」為中心，先從國內外相關文獻資料之蒐集與整理，瞭解警察強制措施之概念、區分及合法性判斷問題，進而比較「刑事犯罪現行犯之逮捕」、「現行違反行政法上義務行為人之處置」、「警察職權行使法之身分查證」等不同干預程度之警察強制措施本質上區分，及探討有關現行犯逮捕之相關法制與實務問題，兼並論及警察強制措施救濟制度及相關責任。本論文期藉由對於現行犯逮捕等警察強制措施之研究，提出執行警察強制措施應具備之基本法律觀念及具體執法建議，以助於正確適用法令提升執法品質，避免違法疏誤導致侵害人權衍生相關責任問題，並期達到人權保障及治安維護雙贏的局面。 Police, including law enforcement organization and officers, is authorized to utilize a variety of methods to achieve legal tasks. In general, police organization establishes standardized procedure or normative regulation. Police officers enforce laws or regulations in the specific cases, using coercive or non-coercive measures. Coercive measure, including criminal and administrative is the most invasive action that violates the people's freedom and property. The legality issue should be taken into serious consideration. While dealing with street-level situations, police is often confronted with chaos involving criminal law-violated, administrative law-violated and civil law-violated. The study aims to set up an accurate law-enforcing procedure to decrease inappropriate treatment that might cause criminal, administrative, civil or national indemnity liability.The article focuses on the arrest in flagrante delicto of Taiwan as an example of police criminal coercion. Through literature review, this article introduces the theory and concept of coercive measures. Besides, this article compares three situations-“arrest in flagrante delicto “, “enforcement measure on the administrative law violated’, and “identity inspection” to clarify different interference, remedy system and responsibility. By looking at the normative measures and police practices surrounding arrest in flagrante delicto, the study tries to provide basic legal knowledge and advices for law-enforcement officers while using coercive measures. Meanwhile, properly utilizing laws will improve law-enforcement quality and avoid chances of ignorance. This way, the protection of human rights and society security could be achieved at the same time.
510 1 $a The Study on the Legality of Coercive Measure Made by Police $e focusing on the Active Criminal $z eng
517 1 $a 以現行犯之逮捕為中心 $z chi
610 0 $a 警察強制措施 $a 刑事強制處分 $a 行政強制措施 $a 現行犯逮捕 $a 違反行政法上義務行為人 $a 身分查證措施 $a 合法性
610 1 $a police coercive measure $a criminal coercive treatment $a administrative coercive measure $a arrest in flagrante delicto $a the administrative obligation violated $a identity inspection $a legality
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 380101 7511 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 陳 $b 玲君 $4 撰 $3 173925
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 法律學系碩士班 $3 166036
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20121107 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/48599683841334979104