國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

論專斷醫療行為在我國刑法上之評價 = An Evaluation of ...

國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班

論專斷醫療行為在我國刑法上之評價 = An Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Criminal Law

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	An Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Criminal Law
作者:	陳韋誠,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2013[民102]
面頁冊數:	131面圖 : 30公分;
標題:	專斷醫療行為
標題:	consent from patients
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/60803944140023303973
附註:	參考書目：面[117-124]
摘要註:	本論文研製之目的乃係在檢視專斷醫療行為究竟在刑法上應如何予以評價。亦即，若醫師所為之醫療行為並未獲得病患同意時，是否會該當刑法上犯罪之成立，乃是本文所欲探討之事項。而既然欲判斷專斷醫療行為在刑法之評價，則首先必須瞭解的是，何謂醫療行為。因此，在本文的撰寫上，首先即就何謂醫療行為予以定義，而在醫療行為中，由於侵入性醫療行為較具有刑法上討論之意義，故論述完何謂醫療行為後，再就所謂侵入性醫療行為是否該當刑法上傷害或重傷罪之構成要件予以分析探討。再者，由於實務上曾有判決認定，醫師於未踐行告知義務時，即屬刑法上注意義務之違反該當刑法上過失犯罪成立。然而，究竟醫療法上所課予醫師於實行侵入性醫療行為時所必須踐行的告知義務，究竟在刑法上扮演何種角色，由於學說與實務上仍屬分歧，故本文將就過失犯之體系予以分析論述，於探討究竟何謂過失之注意義務後，再就醫療法上所課予醫師之告知義務予以判斷，究竟該等告知義務之履行與否，與刑法上注意義務違反間是否有必然之邏輯關係。雖然醫療行為會該當刑法上傷害罪或重傷罪構成要件之成立，然而構成要件之成立並不代表犯罪之成立。因此，在認定醫療行為該當刑法上犯罪構成要件成立後，必須就違法性予以判斷。亦即，必須就刑法上法規阻卻違法事由與超法規阻卻違法事由論述，以判斷醫療行為是否有上開阻卻違法事由之適用，阻卻行為之違法性。且由於病患同意與阻卻違法事由之適用與否息息相關（如業務上正當行為、被害人同意）。因此，本文在論述醫療行為是否具有刑法上阻卻違法事由之適用後，將再就告知後同意之法理予以分析論述，以期能夠真正理解，究竟在醫病關係中，病患在什麼情況下所為之同意才屬具真意而無瑕疵之同意，而得將該同意予以援用至刑法之判斷體系中。 The thesis is to examine the medical practice in the context of criminal law. In order to develop this subject, the author divides this issue into the following parts. Firstly, we have to figure out what the medical practice or treatment mean. In other words, we try to offer a relatively clearer scope to indicate the definition of medical treatment in our discussion. Additionally, for its importance in criminal law, we put more emphasis on the construction of invasive medical treatment, and, based on this approach, we will subsequently discuss whether this treatment is able to fulfill the elements of offenses of causing bodily harm. Secondly, some judicial practitioners have indicated that the physicians who have not implement their duty to warn, before they start invasive medical treatments, will commit the offenses of causing bodily harm in negligence. Based on this stance, we are to clarify the interaction of the warning duty and the offenses. Especially, we want to investigate whether this crime and the duty have an absolute correlation. Lastly and more importantly, we will switch our focus on the consents from patients. In this context, we are to discuss the meaning of consents in the evaluation of the element of illegality in criminal law. Therefore, as the last part of our research, we will try to offer a standard to determine what consent without defect is and, conversely, what consent with defect is.

論專斷醫療行為在我國刑法上之評價 = An Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Criminal Law
陳, 韋誠

論專斷醫療行為在我國刑法上之評價 = An Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Criminal Law / 陳韋誠撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2013[民102]. - 131面 ; 圖 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面[117-124].
專斷醫療行為consent from patients

論專斷醫療行為在我國刑法上之評價 = An Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Criminal Law
LDR:04777nam0a2200277 450 001 360448
005 20170214100734.0
009 360448
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20170214d2013 k y0chiy05 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 論專斷醫療行為在我國刑法上之評價 $d An Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Criminal Law $z eng $f 陳韋誠撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2013[民102]
215 0 $a 131面 $c 圖 $d 30公分
300 $a 參考書目：面[117-124]
314 $a 指導教授：謝開平博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學法律學系碩士班
330 $a 本論文研製之目的乃係在檢視專斷醫療行為究竟在刑法上應如何予以評價。亦即，若醫師所為之醫療行為並未獲得病患同意時，是否會該當刑法上犯罪之成立，乃是本文所欲探討之事項。而既然欲判斷專斷醫療行為在刑法之評價，則首先必須瞭解的是，何謂醫療行為。因此，在本文的撰寫上，首先即就何謂醫療行為予以定義，而在醫療行為中，由於侵入性醫療行為較具有刑法上討論之意義，故論述完何謂醫療行為後，再就所謂侵入性醫療行為是否該當刑法上傷害或重傷罪之構成要件予以分析探討。再者，由於實務上曾有判決認定，醫師於未踐行告知義務時，即屬刑法上注意義務之違反該當刑法上過失犯罪成立。然而，究竟醫療法上所課予醫師於實行侵入性醫療行為時所必須踐行的告知義務，究竟在刑法上扮演何種角色，由於學說與實務上仍屬分歧，故本文將就過失犯之體系予以分析論述，於探討究竟何謂過失之注意義務後，再就醫療法上所課予醫師之告知義務予以判斷，究竟該等告知義務之履行與否，與刑法上注意義務違反間是否有必然之邏輯關係。雖然醫療行為會該當刑法上傷害罪或重傷罪構成要件之成立，然而構成要件之成立並不代表犯罪之成立。因此，在認定醫療行為該當刑法上犯罪構成要件成立後，必須就違法性予以判斷。亦即，必須就刑法上法規阻卻違法事由與超法規阻卻違法事由論述，以判斷醫療行為是否有上開阻卻違法事由之適用，阻卻行為之違法性。且由於病患同意與阻卻違法事由之適用與否息息相關（如業務上正當行為、被害人同意）。因此，本文在論述醫療行為是否具有刑法上阻卻違法事由之適用後，將再就告知後同意之法理予以分析論述，以期能夠真正理解，究竟在醫病關係中，病患在什麼情況下所為之同意才屬具真意而無瑕疵之同意，而得將該同意予以援用至刑法之判斷體系中。 The thesis is to examine the medical practice in the context of criminal law. In order to develop this subject, the author divides this issue into the following parts. Firstly, we have to figure out what the medical practice or treatment mean. In other words, we try to offer a relatively clearer scope to indicate the definition of medical treatment in our discussion. Additionally, for its importance in criminal law, we put more emphasis on the construction of invasive medical treatment, and, based on this approach, we will subsequently discuss whether this treatment is able to fulfill the elements of offenses of causing bodily harm. Secondly, some judicial practitioners have indicated that the physicians who have not implement their duty to warn, before they start invasive medical treatments, will commit the offenses of causing bodily harm in negligence. Based on this stance, we are to clarify the interaction of the warning duty and the offenses. Especially, we want to investigate whether this crime and the duty have an absolute correlation. Lastly and more importantly, we will switch our focus on the consents from patients. In this context, we are to discuss the meaning of consents in the evaluation of the element of illegality in criminal law. Therefore, as the last part of our research, we will try to offer a standard to determine what consent without defect is and, conversely, what consent with defect is.
510 1 $a An Evaluation of Medical Malpractice in Criminal Law $z eng
610 0 $a 專斷醫療行為 $a 醫療行為 $a 醫師告知義務 $a 注意義務 $a 業務上正當行為 $a 被害人同意 $a 緊急避難 $a 告知後同意
610 1 $a consent from patients $a medical practice $a physicians warning duty $a consent with fully informed
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 380101 7540 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 陳 $b 韋誠 $4 撰 $3 592855
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 法律學系碩士班 $3 166036
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20130306 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/60803944140023303973