國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

少年保護處分制度實質效益之法政策分析－以受保護處分少年應考試權之限制為例...

國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班

少年保護處分制度實質效益之法政策分析－以受保護處分少年應考試權之限制為例 = The Practical Benefits of Juvenile Probation System：From the point of view in analysing Legal Policy : taking the limited right in taking examinations of juveniles on probation

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : 單行本
並列題名:	The Practical Benefits of Juvenile Probation System：From the point of view in analysing Legal Policy
副題名:	taking the limited right in taking examinations of juveniles on probation
作者:	李泰吉,
其他團體作者:	國立高雄大學
出版地:	[高雄市]
出版者:	撰者;
出版年:	2013[民102]
面頁冊數:	206面圖，表格 : 30公分;
標題:	受保護處分少年
標題:	Probated Juveniles
電子資源:	http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/79136626552512412639
附註:	參考書目：面191-196
附註:	102年10月31日公開
摘要註:	國家中之「兒童及少年社會福利及權利保障」為現代國家之重要政策，目前也是我國一向重視的課題。雖然此一重要領域在法學尚持續開發中，但近年來國民之基本權利意識的抬頭，相關議題已經升高到憲法位階。由於社會福利及其相關權利內涵過於龐雜，尤其對於少數一時誤入歧途之受保護處分少年之保護，其保護更顯薄弱。又青少年所處的時期正值生理、心理與社會角色地位適應的劇烈變遷期。因此，少年在此時期最需要獲得社會福利方面的提供，例如健全的學校教育、心理諮商、輔導與關懷、生活扶助、保護、安置與休閒活動提供等，均是重要的福利措施。探討受保護處分少年其邊緣化的人生階段，可了解其在人生的洪流中不斷找尋自我與出路。在此階段，青少年面臨許多問題與挑戰，而本論文主要內容係以受保護處分少年報考軍事聯招因其消極資格所遭受之限制為論述。且依現代民主法治國之理念，基於「憲政主義」的精神，認為基本人權不得任意加以限制，限制基本人權的法律，必須符合憲法精神，才具有正當性。在我國，升學考試、軍事聯招、國家考試等考試種類，均受到注意之程度頗深，每年報考人數眾多，而「考試」，除了是國家公權力之外，我國憲法特別規定「應考試」是基本人權，為了保障人民基本權益，「應考試權」的限制，自不能由行政或立法機關任意為之，而應符合憲法精神。本論文首先以法律政策學及憲法相關基本權與行政法之原則來逐一探討該消極應考資格限制之合法性。結果發現，由「比例原則」來檢視，目前「少年保護處分制度實質效益之法政策分析－以受保護處分少年應考試權之限制為例」法規中，有關消極應考資格之規定，有違憲的地方，亟待加以改進。 “Children and youth social welfare and right protection” in a country are important national policies, as well as an important issue in Taiwan. Although this important field is still under development in laws, with the rise of awareness of fundamental rights of citizens in recent years, relevant issues have been elevated to the level of the Constitution. Because the concepts of social welfare and their related rights are excessively complicated, it seems that the protection for probated juveniles who went astray once in their youth is particularly weak. In addition, teenagers are at this transition period where there are dramatic changes in their physiology, psychology and social role and status. Therefore, their demand for social welfare (e.g. sound school education, psychological consultation, counseling and care, life support, protection and provision of placement and leisure activities) provided by the society is the strongest. This study investigated the marginalized life stage of probated juveniles, and found that they keep looking for ego and outlet in the stream of life. At this stage, teenagers face many problems and challenges. This study investigated the disqualification for military joint examination of probated juveniles. Moreover, according to the concepts of modern democratic countries and based on the spirit of “constitutionalism,” the fundamental human rights should be not arbitrarily restricted. The restrictions to fundamental human rights cannot be justified until they meet the spirit of the Constitution. In Taiwan, the qualifications for school entrance examinations, military joint examination and national examinations are strict. Many people participate in such examinations every year. The right to “hold examinations” is a national public authority. In addition, it is particularly stipulated in the Constitution in Taiwan that the right to “participate in examinations” is a fundamental human right. To protect the fundamental rights of people, executive or legislative authorities should not arbitrarily impose restrictions on the “right to participate in examinations” and should comply with the spirit of the Constitution. This study preliminarily investigated the legitimacy to cancel the restrictions on qualifications for examinations according to the principles of legal policies, Constitution-related fundamental rights and administrative laws one by one. According to the research results, this study inspected the existing laws and regulations in the “Legal Policy Analysis on the Substantive Effect of Juvenile Protective Measures and Systems – Taking the Restrictions on the Right to Participate in Examinations of Probated Juveniles for Example” from the perspective of principle of proportionality, and found that the negative provisions concerning the qualifications for participation in examinations violate the Constitution and should be amended and improved.

少年保護處分制度實質效益之法政策分析－以受保護處分少年應考試權之限制為例 = The Practical Benefits of Juvenile Probation System：From the point of view in analysing Legal Policy : taking the limited right in taking examinations of juveniles on probation
李, 泰吉

少年保護處分制度實質效益之法政策分析－以受保護處分少年應考試權之限制為例 = The Practical Benefits of Juvenile Probation System：From the point of view in analysing Legal Policy : taking the limited right in taking examinations of juveniles on probation / 李泰吉撰 - [高雄市] : 撰者, 2013[民102]. - 206面 ; 圖，表格 ; 30公分.
參考書目：面191-196102年10月31日公開.
受保護處分少年Probated Juveniles

少年保護處分制度實質效益之法政策分析－以受保護處分少年應考試權之限制為例 = The Practical Benefits of Juvenile Probation System：From the point of view in analysing Legal Policy : taking the limited right in taking examinations of juveniles on probation
LDR:06424nam0a2200289 450 001 389583
005 20230611210030.0
009 389583
010 0 $b 精裝
010 0 $b 平裝
100 $a 20130926d2013 k y0chiy05 e
101 1 $a chi $d chi $d eng
102 $a tw
105 $a ak am 000yy
200 1 $a 少年保護處分制度實質效益之法政策分析－以受保護處分少年應考試權之限制為例 $d The Practical Benefits of Juvenile Probation System：From the point of view in analysing Legal Policy $e taking the limited right in taking examinations of juveniles on probation $z eng $f 李泰吉撰
210 $a [高雄市] $c 撰者 $d 2013[民102]
215 0 $a 206面 $c 圖，表格 $d 30公分
300 $a 參考書目：面191-196
300 $a 102年10月31日公開
314 $a 指導教授：廖義銘博士
328 $a 碩士論文--國立高雄大學政治法律學系碩士班
330 $a 國家中之「兒童及少年社會福利及權利保障」為現代國家之重要政策，目前也是我國一向重視的課題。雖然此一重要領域在法學尚持續開發中，但近年來國民之基本權利意識的抬頭，相關議題已經升高到憲法位階。由於社會福利及其相關權利內涵過於龐雜，尤其對於少數一時誤入歧途之受保護處分少年之保護，其保護更顯薄弱。又青少年所處的時期正值生理、心理與社會角色地位適應的劇烈變遷期。因此，少年在此時期最需要獲得社會福利方面的提供，例如健全的學校教育、心理諮商、輔導與關懷、生活扶助、保護、安置與休閒活動提供等，均是重要的福利措施。探討受保護處分少年其邊緣化的人生階段，可了解其在人生的洪流中不斷找尋自我與出路。在此階段，青少年面臨許多問題與挑戰，而本論文主要內容係以受保護處分少年報考軍事聯招因其消極資格所遭受之限制為論述。且依現代民主法治國之理念，基於「憲政主義」的精神，認為基本人權不得任意加以限制，限制基本人權的法律，必須符合憲法精神，才具有正當性。在我國，升學考試、軍事聯招、國家考試等考試種類，均受到注意之程度頗深，每年報考人數眾多，而「考試」，除了是國家公權力之外，我國憲法特別規定「應考試」是基本人權，為了保障人民基本權益，「應考試權」的限制，自不能由行政或立法機關任意為之，而應符合憲法精神。本論文首先以法律政策學及憲法相關基本權與行政法之原則來逐一探討該消極應考資格限制之合法性。結果發現，由「比例原則」來檢視，目前「少年保護處分制度實質效益之法政策分析－以受保護處分少年應考試權之限制為例」法規中，有關消極應考資格之規定，有違憲的地方，亟待加以改進。 “Children and youth social welfare and right protection” in a country are important national policies, as well as an important issue in Taiwan. Although this important field is still under development in laws, with the rise of awareness of fundamental rights of citizens in recent years, relevant issues have been elevated to the level of the Constitution. Because the concepts of social welfare and their related rights are excessively complicated, it seems that the protection for probated juveniles who went astray once in their youth is particularly weak. In addition, teenagers are at this transition period where there are dramatic changes in their physiology, psychology and social role and status. Therefore, their demand for social welfare (e.g. sound school education, psychological consultation, counseling and care, life support, protection and provision of placement and leisure activities) provided by the society is the strongest. This study investigated the marginalized life stage of probated juveniles, and found that they keep looking for ego and outlet in the stream of life. At this stage, teenagers face many problems and challenges. This study investigated the disqualification for military joint examination of probated juveniles. Moreover, according to the concepts of modern democratic countries and based on the spirit of “constitutionalism,” the fundamental human rights should be not arbitrarily restricted. The restrictions to fundamental human rights cannot be justified until they meet the spirit of the Constitution. In Taiwan, the qualifications for school entrance examinations, military joint examination and national examinations are strict. Many people participate in such examinations every year. The right to “hold examinations” is a national public authority. In addition, it is particularly stipulated in the Constitution in Taiwan that the right to “participate in examinations” is a fundamental human right. To protect the fundamental rights of people, executive or legislative authorities should not arbitrarily impose restrictions on the “right to participate in examinations” and should comply with the spirit of the Constitution. This study preliminarily investigated the legitimacy to cancel the restrictions on qualifications for examinations according to the principles of legal policies, Constitution-related fundamental rights and administrative laws one by one. According to the research results, this study inspected the existing laws and regulations in the “Legal Policy Analysis on the Substantive Effect of Juvenile Protective Measures and Systems – Taking the Restrictions on the Right to Participate in Examinations of Probated Juveniles for Example” from the perspective of principle of proportionality, and found that the negative provisions concerning the qualifications for participation in examinations violate the Constitution and should be amended and improved.
510 1 $a The Practical Benefits of Juvenile Probation System $e From the point of view in analysing Legal Policy$etaking the limited right in taking examinations of juveniles on probation $z eng
610 0 $a 受保護處分少年 $a 刑事處分 $a 保安處分 $a 應考資格 $a 比例原則
610 1 $a Probated Juveniles $a Criminal disposal $a Rehabilitative Measures
681 $a 008M/0019 $b 382101 4054 $v 2007年版
700 1 $a 李 $b 泰吉 $4 撰 $3 614454
712 0 2 $a 國立高雄大學 $b 政治法律學系碩士班 $3 166052
801 0 $a tw $b NUK $c 20130930 $g CCR
856 7 $z 電子資源 $2 http $u http://handle.ncl.edu.tw/11296/ndltd/79136626552512412639