| 摘要註: |
本研究旨在以法政策學的觀點分析單親家庭扶助制度，由該制度本身出發，向前延伸政策源起與法律制定之間的關係，並以執行機關與標的人口的訪談觀察，對於該制度引領的變革與未來修正方向進行說明。本研究採深入訪談法，並根據研究目的、問題及文獻探討之結果，編製訪談大綱進行訪談，研究者以高雄市政府社會局、楠梓區公所之承辦人及單親家庭為研究對象，瞭解單親家庭扶助制度之運作現況，主要發現如下：一、單親家庭扶助制度之政策認知，包括：政策認知普遍認為能扶助弱勢單親家庭、政府部門本身特性致執行該制度較為確實且持續、扶助制度之扶助程度是扶助對象較為關注之焦點。二、單親家庭扶助制度之法律理解，包括：扶助制度為許多法規所構建而成且由不同機關分別受理、現行補助項目具重疊性、現行制度審查標準眾多歧異、審查範圍具變動性，致應備文件亦增多。三、單親家庭扶助制度之執行成效認知，包括：申請者不知，甚至錯失申請時機、僅由審查標準決定扶助與否，未能就家庭現況給予審查。亦無分層給予不同金額補助，且審查標準有趨嚴現象、扶助制度所提供之教育幫助有限、扶助制度所提供之金錢幫助有限、扶助制度所提供不足之個人作為、就業困難仍難以改善。依據以上之研究發現，本研究對此分別提出以下建議：一、制訂單親家庭政策，統一法制。二、發展多元多層次補助，設置單一窗口。三、放寬單親扶助審查標準，提高扶助服務之普及率。 This study was designed to view The systematic analysis of single-family benefits, starting from the system itself, extending forward from the policy relationship between the source and the law-making, and in interviews with the target population enforcement authorities observe, for the system leading change and the future direction of the correction described.In this study, mining depth interviews, and according to research purposes, problems and results of the literature review, interview preparation interview outline, Kaohsiung City Bureau of Social Affairs investigators government, contractors Nanzih district office of the research object and single-parent families, single parents understand operational status of the family support system, the main findings are as follows:First, the policy support system of cognitive-parent families, including: policy awareness generally thought to help the disadvantaged single-parent families, government itself caused by the implementation of the system is more characteristic of true and sustained, the extent of the support system is the focus of assistance to support the object of more attention.Second, the legal system of single-parent families to assist understanding, including: support system is built for many regulations and were accepted by the different organs, the current subsidy programs overlap with the existing system to review the standard of many differences, a change in the scope of the review, should cause prepare documents also increased.Third, the implementation of the effectiveness of cognitive support system of single-parent families, including: Applicants do not know, and even missed the opportunity to apply only to assist or not is determined by the standard of review, the review failed to give it the status of the family. No amount of subsidy given different stratification and review standards are tighter phenomenon, education support system provided limited assistance, money provided by the support system to help is limited, inadequate personal support system provided by the act, is still difficult to improve employment difficulties.Based on the above findings of this study were presented following this advice:First, the formulation of single-parent family policy, unified legal system.Second, the development of multi-multi-level grants, set a single window.Third, support single standard of review to relax, improve penetration support services. |