國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Interdisciplinary research and trans...

Gethmann, C.F.

Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claimsby C.F. Gethmann ... [et al.].
其他作者:	Gethmann, C.F.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015.
面頁冊數:	xvi, 195 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Interdisciplinary research.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
ISBN:	9783319114002 (electronic bk.)

Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims[electronic resource] /by C.F. Gethmann ... [et al.]. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015. - xvi, 195 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Ethics of science and technology assessment,v.431860-4803 ;. - Ethics of science and technology assessment ;v.43..

Introduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.

Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.

ISBN: 9783319114002 (electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

275434
Interdisciplinary research.

LC Class. No.: Q180.55.I48

Dewey Class. No.: 001.4

Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims
LDR:02215nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 460102
003 DE-He213
005 20150617143921.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 151110s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319114002 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319113999 (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-11400-2
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a Q180.55.I48
072 7 $a PDA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI075000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 001.4 $2 23
090 $a Q180.55.I48 $b I61 2015
245 0 0 $a Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims $h [electronic resource] / $c by C.F. Gethmann ... [et al.].
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a xvi, 195 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Ethics of science and technology assessment, $x 1860-4803 ; $v v.43
505 0 $a Introduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.
520 $a Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.
650 0 $a Interdisciplinary research. $3 275434
650 1 4 $a Philosophy. $3 176573
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 277156
650 2 4 $a R & D/Technology Policy. $3 274390
650 2 4 $a Knowledge - Discourse. $3 681483
700 1 $a Gethmann, C.F. $3 711296
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Ethics of science and technology assessment ; $v v.43. $3 711297
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
950 $a Engineering (Springer-11647)