國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Modest nonconceptualismepistemology,...

Schmidt, Eva.

Modest nonconceptualismepistemology, phenomenology, and content /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Modest nonconceptualismby Eva Schmidt.
Reminder of title:	epistemology, phenomenology, and content /
Author:	Schmidt, Eva.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015.
Description:	xi, 268 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Knowledge, Theory of.
Online resource:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18902-4
ISBN:	9783319189024 (electronic bk.)

Modest nonconceptualismepistemology, phenomenology, and content /
Schmidt, Eva.

Modest nonconceptualismepistemology, phenomenology, and content /[electronic resource] :by Eva Schmidt. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015. - xi, 268 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Studies in brain and mind ;v.8. - Studies in brain and mind ;v.6..

1 Introduction -- 2 Content, Concepts, Concept Possession -- 3 Nonconceptual Content -- 4 Arguments from Phenomenology -- 5 The Argument from Contradictory Contents -- 6 Arguments from Concept Possession -- 7 The Epistemological Objection -- 8 The Objection from Objectivity -- 9 Modest Nonconceptualism Vindicated.

The author defends nonconceptualism, the claim that perceptual experience is nonconceptual and has nonconceptual content. Continuing the heated and complex debate surrounding this topic over the past two decades, she offers a sustained defense of a novel version of the view, Modest Nonconceptualism, and provides a systematic overview of some of the central controversies in the debate. The volume starts off with an explication of the notion of nonconceptual content and a distinction between nonconceptualist views of different strengths, then the author goes on to defend participants in the debate over nonconceptual content against the allegation that their failure to distinguish between a state view and a content view of (non)conceptualism leads to fatal problems for their views. Next, she makes a case for nonconceptualism by refining some of the central arguments for the view, such as the arguments from fineness of grain, from contradictory contents, from animal and infant perception, and from concept acquisition. Then, two central objections against nonconceptualism are rebutted in a novel way: the epistemological objection and the objection from objectivity. Modest Nonconceptualism allows for perceptual experiences to involve some conceptual elements. It emphasizes the relevance of concept employment for an understanding of conceptual and nonconceptual mental states and identifies the nonconceptual content of experience with scenario content. It insists on the possibility of genuine content-bearing perceptual experience without concept possession and is thus in line with the Autonomy Thesis. Finally, it includes an account of perceptual justification that relies on the external contents of experience and belief, yet is compatible with epistemological internalism.

ISBN: 9783319189024 (electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-18902-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

178850
Knowledge, Theory of.

LC Class. No.: BD161.A67

Dewey Class. No.: 121

Modest nonconceptualismepistemology, phenomenology, and content /
LDR:03110nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 472725
003 DE-He213
005 20160301111228.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 160316s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319189024 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319189017 (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-18902-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-18902-4
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BD161.A67
072 7 $a HPM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI015000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 121 $2 23
090 $a BD161.A67 $b S349 2015
100 1 $a Schmidt, Eva. $3 727975
245 1 0 $a Modest nonconceptualism $h [electronic resource] : $b epistemology, phenomenology, and content / $c by Eva Schmidt.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a xi, 268 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Studies in brain and mind ; $v v.8
505 0 $a 1 Introduction -- 2 Content, Concepts, Concept Possession -- 3 Nonconceptual Content -- 4 Arguments from Phenomenology -- 5 The Argument from Contradictory Contents -- 6 Arguments from Concept Possession -- 7 The Epistemological Objection -- 8 The Objection from Objectivity -- 9 Modest Nonconceptualism Vindicated.
520 $a The author defends nonconceptualism, the claim that perceptual experience is nonconceptual and has nonconceptual content. Continuing the heated and complex debate surrounding this topic over the past two decades, she offers a sustained defense of a novel version of the view, Modest Nonconceptualism, and provides a systematic overview of some of the central controversies in the debate. The volume starts off with an explication of the notion of nonconceptual content and a distinction between nonconceptualist views of different strengths, then the author goes on to defend participants in the debate over nonconceptual content against the allegation that their failure to distinguish between a state view and a content view of (non)conceptualism leads to fatal problems for their views. Next, she makes a case for nonconceptualism by refining some of the central arguments for the view, such as the arguments from fineness of grain, from contradictory contents, from animal and infant perception, and from concept acquisition. Then, two central objections against nonconceptualism are rebutted in a novel way: the epistemological objection and the objection from objectivity. Modest Nonconceptualism allows for perceptual experiences to involve some conceptual elements. It emphasizes the relevance of concept employment for an understanding of conceptual and nonconceptual mental states and identifies the nonconceptual content of experience with scenario content. It insists on the possibility of genuine content-bearing perceptual experience without concept possession and is thus in line with the Autonomy Thesis. Finally, it includes an account of perceptual justification that relies on the external contents of experience and belief, yet is compatible with epistemological internalism.
650 0 $a Knowledge, Theory of. $3 178850
650 1 4 $a Philosophy. $3 176573
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Mind. $3 276634
650 2 4 $a Epistemology. $3 275100
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Studies in brain and mind ; $v v.6. $3 674978
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18902-4
950 $a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)