國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Comparative empirical bioethicsdilem...

Raz, Aviad E.

Comparative empirical bioethicsdilemmas of genetic testing and euthanasia in Israel and Germany /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparative empirical bioethicsby Aviad E. Raz, Silke Schicktanz.
Reminder of title:	dilemmas of genetic testing and euthanasia in Israel and Germany /
Author:	Raz, Aviad E.
other author:	Schicktanz, Silke.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016.
Description:	xi, 121 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Human chromosome abnormalitiesDiagnosisIsrael.
Online resource:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32733-4
ISBN:	9783319327334$q(electronic bk.)

Comparative empirical bioethicsdilemmas of genetic testing and euthanasia in Israel and Germany /
Raz, Aviad E.

Comparative empirical bioethicsdilemmas of genetic testing and euthanasia in Israel and Germany /[electronic resource] :by Aviad E. Raz, Silke Schicktanz. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - xi, 121 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - SpringerBriefs in ethics,2211-8101. - SpringerBriefs in ethics..

1 Introduction: Engaging in Comparative Bioethics -- 2 Setting the Methodological Scene: The Value of Explication and Pluralization of Moral Grammars -- 3 Applying the Theoretical Tools: Being Affected, Responsibility, and Risk -- 4 Contextualizing the Cultural and Medico-Legal Debate on Adult Genetic Testing -- 5 Making Responsible Life Plans: Cultural Differences in Lay Attitudes in Germany and Israel towards Predictive Genetic Testing for Late-Onset Diseases -- 6 Planning One's End of Life in an Expert Biomedical Culture -- 7 Lay Attitudes towards End-of-Life Decision-Making in Germany and Israel -- 8 Risks and Responsibilities: Making Plans for Life and Death -- 9 Final Conclusion: Disentangling the Micro and the Macro in Bioethics.

This book is a comprehensive, empirically-grounded exploration of the relationship between bioethics, culture, and the perspective of being affected. It provides a new outlook on how complex bioethical" issues become questions of everyday life. The authors focus on two contexts, genetic testing and end-of-life care, to locate and demonstrate emerging themes of responsibility, such as self-responsibility, responsibility for kin, and the responsibility of society. Within these themes, the duty to know versus the right not to know one's genetic fate (in the context of genetic testing), or the sanctity of life versus self-determination (in the context of end of life care) are identified as culturally embedded dilemmas that are very much relevant for lay persons. Furthermore, cultural factors such as religion, history, utopian and dystopian views of biomedical technologies, outlooks on the body and on health/illness, and citizenship are examined. Health issues are increasingly becoming a question of assessing risk and responsibility: How can we better prepare ourselves for the future? We all make such assessments in a way that combines personal inclinations, professional recommendations, and cultural framings. There is still much to be learned about the interplay between these three dimensions.

ISBN: 9783319327334$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-32733-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

745290
Human chromosome abnormalities
--Diagnosis--Israel.

LC Class. No.: RB155.6 / .R39 2016

Dewey Class. No.: 616.042

Comparative empirical bioethicsdilemmas of genetic testing and euthanasia in Israel and Germany /
LDR:03113nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 486957
003 DE-He213
005 20161013160111.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 161116s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319327334$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319327310$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-32733-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-32733-4
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a RB155.6 $b .R39 2016
072 7 $a HPQ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI005000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 616.042 $2 23
090 $a RB155.6 $b .R278 2016
100 1 $a Raz, Aviad E. $3 745288
245 1 0 $a Comparative empirical bioethics $h [electronic resource] : $b dilemmas of genetic testing and euthanasia in Israel and Germany / $c by Aviad E. Raz, Silke Schicktanz.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a xi, 121 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in ethics, $x 2211-8101
505 0 $a 1 Introduction: Engaging in Comparative Bioethics -- 2 Setting the Methodological Scene: The Value of Explication and Pluralization of Moral Grammars -- 3 Applying the Theoretical Tools: Being Affected, Responsibility, and Risk -- 4 Contextualizing the Cultural and Medico-Legal Debate on Adult Genetic Testing -- 5 Making Responsible Life Plans: Cultural Differences in Lay Attitudes in Germany and Israel towards Predictive Genetic Testing for Late-Onset Diseases -- 6 Planning One's End of Life in an Expert Biomedical Culture -- 7 Lay Attitudes towards End-of-Life Decision-Making in Germany and Israel -- 8 Risks and Responsibilities: Making Plans for Life and Death -- 9 Final Conclusion: Disentangling the Micro and the Macro in Bioethics.
520 $a This book is a comprehensive, empirically-grounded exploration of the relationship between bioethics, culture, and the perspective of being affected. It provides a new outlook on how complex bioethical" issues become questions of everyday life. The authors focus on two contexts, genetic testing and end-of-life care, to locate and demonstrate emerging themes of responsibility, such as self-responsibility, responsibility for kin, and the responsibility of society. Within these themes, the duty to know versus the right not to know one's genetic fate (in the context of genetic testing), or the sanctity of life versus self-determination (in the context of end of life care) are identified as culturally embedded dilemmas that are very much relevant for lay persons. Furthermore, cultural factors such as religion, history, utopian and dystopian views of biomedical technologies, outlooks on the body and on health/illness, and citizenship are examined. Health issues are increasingly becoming a question of assessing risk and responsibility: How can we better prepare ourselves for the future? We all make such assessments in a way that combines personal inclinations, professional recommendations, and cultural framings. There is still much to be learned about the interplay between these three dimensions.
650 0 $a Human chromosome abnormalities $x Diagnosis $x Moral and ethical aspects $z Israel. $3 745290
650 0 $a Human chromosome abnormalities $x Diagnosis $x Moral and ethical aspects $z Germany. $3 745291
650 0 $a Euthanasia $x Moral and ethical aspects $z Israel. $3 745292
650 0 $a Euthanasia $x Moral and ethical aspects $z Germany. $3 745293
650 0 $a Bioethics. $3 195040
650 1 4 $a Philosophy. $3 176573
650 2 4 $a Ethics. $3 174971
650 2 4 $a Theory of Medicine/Bioethics. $3 275636
650 2 4 $a Human Genetics. $3 273658
700 1 $a Schicktanz, Silke. $3 745289
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in ethics. $3 674619
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32733-4
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)