國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Scientific peer reviewguidelines for...

SpringerLink (Online service)

Scientific peer reviewguidelines for informative peer review /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Scientific peer reviewby J. Matthias Starck.
Reminder of title:	guidelines for informative peer review /
Author:	Starck, J. Matthias.
Published:	Wiesbaden :Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden :2017.
Description:	ix, 59 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Academic writing.
Online resource:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19915-9
ISBN:	9783658199159$q(electronic bk.)

Scientific peer reviewguidelines for informative peer review /
Starck, J. Matthias.

Scientific peer reviewguidelines for informative peer review /[electronic resource] :by J. Matthias Starck. - Wiesbaden :Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden :2017. - ix, 59 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - essentials,2197-6708. - essentials..

J. Matthias Starck comprehensively guides the reader in this essential through all steps of writing an expert review for a scientific journal. It is built on a succinct analysis how science works, how science is communicated and how science is published. It provides a critical guide how to write good, informative and fair peer reviews. The author presents a critical discussion of different peer review procedures and their alternatives, explains ethical guidelines as well as the dark sides of scientific publishing. So this essential helps the reader to perform better in the existing system and to contribute to its further development and improvement. Contents Essence of Scientific Communication Why Peer Review? Responsibilities of the Reviewer and Ethical Rules in the Reviewing Process Critique and Variations of the Journal Peer Reviewing Process Reviewer Recognition Institutions and Committees/Recommendations in Conflict Target Groups Advanced PhD students and postdocs from biomedical research and natural science fields who received their first peer review requests and now seek advice and guidance Researchers from all fields of science and all degrees of experience who wish to improve and develop their methodological approach to peer review The Author Prof. Dr. J. Matthias Starck is Professor of Zoology, Department Biology II, at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.

ISBN: 9783658199159$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-658-19915-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

200184
Academic writing.

LC Class. No.: P301.5.A27 / S73 2017

Dewey Class. No.: 808.02

Scientific peer reviewguidelines for informative peer review /
LDR:02386nmm a2200313 a 4500 001 523282
003 DE-He213
005 20180419110318.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 180628s2017 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783658199159$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783658199142$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-658-19915-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-658-19915-9
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a P301.5.A27 $b S73 2017
072 7 $a PSA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI086000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 808.02 $2 23
090 $a P301.5.A27 $b S795 2017
100 1 $a Starck, J. Matthias. $3 794390
245 1 0 $a Scientific peer review $h [electronic resource] : $b guidelines for informative peer review / $c by J. Matthias Starck.
260 $a Wiesbaden : $b Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden : $b Imprint: Springer Spektrum, $c 2017.
300 $a ix, 59 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a essentials, $x 2197-6708
520 $a J. Matthias Starck comprehensively guides the reader in this essential through all steps of writing an expert review for a scientific journal. It is built on a succinct analysis how science works, how science is communicated and how science is published. It provides a critical guide how to write good, informative and fair peer reviews. The author presents a critical discussion of different peer review procedures and their alternatives, explains ethical guidelines as well as the dark sides of scientific publishing. So this essential helps the reader to perform better in the existing system and to contribute to its further development and improvement. Contents Essence of Scientific Communication Why Peer Review? Responsibilities of the Reviewer and Ethical Rules in the Reviewing Process Critique and Variations of the Journal Peer Reviewing Process Reviewer Recognition Institutions and Committees/Recommendations in Conflict Target Groups Advanced PhD students and postdocs from biomedical research and natural science fields who received their first peer review requests and now seek advice and guidance Researchers from all fields of science and all degrees of experience who wish to improve and develop their methodological approach to peer review The Author Prof. Dr. J. Matthias Starck is Professor of Zoology, Department Biology II, at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.
650 0 $a Academic writing. $3 200184
650 0 $a Technical writing. $3 182173
650 0 $a Peer review. $3 242936
650 0 $a Scholarly publishing. $3 258526
650 1 4 $a Life Sciences. $3 273679
650 2 4 $a Life Sciences, general. $3 273878
650 2 4 $a Popular Life Sciences. $3 710991
650 2 4 $a Science Education. $3 275619
650 2 4 $a Coaching. $3 740552
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a essentials. $3 794391
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19915-9
950 $a Biomedical and Life Sciences (Springer-11642)