國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

How to measure the quality of judici...

Bencze, Matyas.

How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	How to measure the quality of judicial reasoningedited by Matyas Bencze, Gar Yein Ng.
other author:	Bencze, Matyas.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018.
Description:	viii, 268 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Judicial process.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6
ISBN:	9783319973166$q(electronic bk.)

How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning
How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning[electronic resource] /edited by Matyas Bencze, Gar Yein Ng. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018. - viii, 268 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice,v.691534-6781 ;. - Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice ;v.10..

Chapter 1. Measuring the Unmeasurable? -- Chapter 2. Judging and the Ethical Life -- Chapter 3. How to Measure? An Essay on the Social Context of Quality Measuring Quality -- Chapter 4. Judicial reasoning from the Perspective of Behavioural Law and Economics -- Chapter 5. Quality of Justice and Lay Participation in Light of Scientific Studies -- Chapter 6. Obstacles and Opportunities - Measuring the Quality of Judicial Reasoning -- Chapter 7. Quality of Judicial Reasoning: England & Wales -- Chapter 8. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in Italy -- Chapter 9. The Quality of Adjudication in France -- Chapter 10. Quality of Legal Decisions: The Criteria Established by the Finnish Judiciary -- Chapter 11. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in the Czech Republic -- Chapter 12. Methods of Quality Assessment of Judicial Reasoning in Hungary -- Chapter 13 Quality of Reasoning in International Criminal Tribunals -- Chapter 14. The Quality of Decision-Making at the Court of Justice of the European Union -- Chapter 15. Reflections on Legal Reasoning in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights.

This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that individual judgments should meet, presenting both academic and practical perspectives. Readers are invited to consider such questions as: What is expected from judicial reasoning? Is there a general concept of good quality with regard to judicial reasoning? Are there any attempts being made to measure the quality of judicial reasoning? The focus here is on judges meeting the highest standards possible in adjudication and how they may be held to account for the way they reason. The contributions examine theoretical questions surrounding the measurement of the quality of judicial reasoning, practices and legal systems across Europe, and judicial reasoning in various international courts. Six legal systems in Europe are featured: England and Wales, Finland, Italy, the Czech Republic, France and Hungary as well as three non-domestic levels of court jurisdictions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) The depth and breadth of subject matter presented in this volume ensure its relevance for many years to come. All those with an interest in benchmarking the quality of judicial reasoning, including judges themselves, academics, students and legal practitioners, can find something of value in this book.

ISBN: 9783319973166$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

232481
Judicial process.

LC Class. No.: K2146 / .H698 2018

Dewey Class. No.: 347.014

How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning
LDR:03700nmm a2200349 a 4500 001 543906
003 DE-He213
005 20190227114523.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 190430s2018 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319973166$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319973159$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-97316-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K2146 $b .H698 2018
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 347.014 $2 23
090 $a K2146 $b .H847 2018
245 0 0 $a How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning $h [electronic resource] / $c edited by Matyas Bencze, Gar Yein Ng.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2018.
300 $a viii, 268 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice, $x 1534-6781 ; $v v.69
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Measuring the Unmeasurable? -- Chapter 2. Judging and the Ethical Life -- Chapter 3. How to Measure? An Essay on the Social Context of Quality Measuring Quality -- Chapter 4. Judicial reasoning from the Perspective of Behavioural Law and Economics -- Chapter 5. Quality of Justice and Lay Participation in Light of Scientific Studies -- Chapter 6. Obstacles and Opportunities - Measuring the Quality of Judicial Reasoning -- Chapter 7. Quality of Judicial Reasoning: England & Wales -- Chapter 8. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in Italy -- Chapter 9. The Quality of Adjudication in France -- Chapter 10. Quality of Legal Decisions: The Criteria Established by the Finnish Judiciary -- Chapter 11. Quality of Justice and of Judicial Reasoning in the Czech Republic -- Chapter 12. Methods of Quality Assessment of Judicial Reasoning in Hungary -- Chapter 13 Quality of Reasoning in International Criminal Tribunals -- Chapter 14. The Quality of Decision-Making at the Court of Justice of the European Union -- Chapter 15. Reflections on Legal Reasoning in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights.
520 $a This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that individual judgments should meet, presenting both academic and practical perspectives. Readers are invited to consider such questions as: What is expected from judicial reasoning? Is there a general concept of good quality with regard to judicial reasoning? Are there any attempts being made to measure the quality of judicial reasoning? The focus here is on judges meeting the highest standards possible in adjudication and how they may be held to account for the way they reason. The contributions examine theoretical questions surrounding the measurement of the quality of judicial reasoning, practices and legal systems across Europe, and judicial reasoning in various international courts. Six legal systems in Europe are featured: England and Wales, Finland, Italy, the Czech Republic, France and Hungary as well as three non-domestic levels of court jurisdictions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) The depth and breadth of subject matter presented in this volume ensure its relevance for many years to come. All those with an interest in benchmarking the quality of judicial reasoning, including judges themselves, academics, students and legal practitioners, can find something of value in this book.
650 0 $a Judicial process. $3 232481
650 0 $a Justice, Administration of. $3 268495
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 530877
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 557741
700 1 $a Bencze, Matyas. $3 822306
700 1 $a Ng, Gar Yein. $3 822307
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice ; $v v.10. $3 557755
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6
950 $a Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)