國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Precedent and statutelawmaking in th...

SpringerLink (Online service)

Precedent and statutelawmaking in the courts versus lawmaking in parliament /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Precedent and statuteby Orlin Yalnazov.
Reminder of title:	lawmaking in the courts versus lawmaking in parliament /
Author:	Yalnazov, Orlin.
Published:	Wiesbaden :Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden :2018.
Description:	xi, 345 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Law and economics.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24385-2
ISBN:	9783658243852$q(electronic bk.)

Precedent and statutelawmaking in the courts versus lawmaking in parliament /
Yalnazov, Orlin.

Precedent and statutelawmaking in the courts versus lawmaking in parliament /[electronic resource] :by Orlin Yalnazov. - Wiesbaden :Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden :2018. - xi, 345 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Okonomische analyse des rechts i economic analysis of law,2524-7360. - Okonomische analyse des rechts i economic analysis of law..

Two Types of Legal Uncertainty -- Economics of the Fact-Law Distinction -- Fact, Law, and Legal Change -- Remoteness in Contract -- Metarules versus Metastandards -- Precedent in the Civil and Common Law.

Should laws be made in courts or in parliaments? Orlin Yalnazov proposes a new approach to the problem. He conceptualizes law as an information product, and law-making as an exercise in production. Law-making has inputs and outputs, and technology is used to transform one into the other. Law may, depending on input and technology, take on different forms: it can be vague or it can be certain. The 'technologies' between which we may choose are precedent and statute. Differences between the two being sizeable, our choice has significant repercussions for the cost of the input and the form of the output. The author applies this framework to several problems, including the comparison between the common and the civil law, comparative civil procedure, and EU law. Perhaps most critically, he offers a critique of the 'efficiency of the common law' hypothesis. Contents Two Types of Legal Uncertainty Economics of the Fact-Law Distinction Fact, Law, and Legal Change Remoteness in Contract Metarules versus Metastandards Precedent in the Civil and Common Law Target Groups Researchers, students, and practitioners in the fields of law, economics, and legal philosophy The Author Orlin Yalnazov was born in Varna. He holds a PhD in Law & Economics, awarded jointly by Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Universitat Hamburg, and Universita di Bologna, as well as an LLM from the University of Cambridge and an LLB from Durham University. He works at the University of Hull.

ISBN: 9783658243852$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-658-24385-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

183770
Law and economics.

LC Class. No.: HB73 / .Y356 2018

Dewey Class. No.: 330

Precedent and statutelawmaking in the courts versus lawmaking in parliament /
LDR:02776nmm a2200349 a 4500 001 545696
003 DE-He213
005 20190322103159.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 190530s2018 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783658243852$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783658243845$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-658-24385-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-658-24385-2
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a HB73 $b .Y356 2018
072 7 $a LBBM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW014000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LBBM $2 thema
072 7 $a LNC $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 330 $2 23
090 $a HB73 $b .Y19 2018
100 1 $a Yalnazov, Orlin. $3 824688
245 1 0 $a Precedent and statute $h [electronic resource] : $b lawmaking in the courts versus lawmaking in parliament / $c by Orlin Yalnazov.
260 $a Wiesbaden : $b Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden : $b Imprint: Springer Gabler, $c 2018.
300 $a xi, 345 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Okonomische analyse des rechts i economic analysis of law, $x 2524-7360
505 0 $a Two Types of Legal Uncertainty -- Economics of the Fact-Law Distinction -- Fact, Law, and Legal Change -- Remoteness in Contract -- Metarules versus Metastandards -- Precedent in the Civil and Common Law.
520 $a Should laws be made in courts or in parliaments? Orlin Yalnazov proposes a new approach to the problem. He conceptualizes law as an information product, and law-making as an exercise in production. Law-making has inputs and outputs, and technology is used to transform one into the other. Law may, depending on input and technology, take on different forms: it can be vague or it can be certain. The 'technologies' between which we may choose are precedent and statute. Differences between the two being sizeable, our choice has significant repercussions for the cost of the input and the form of the output. The author applies this framework to several problems, including the comparison between the common and the civil law, comparative civil procedure, and EU law. Perhaps most critically, he offers a critique of the 'efficiency of the common law' hypothesis. Contents Two Types of Legal Uncertainty Economics of the Fact-Law Distinction Fact, Law, and Legal Change Remoteness in Contract Metarules versus Metastandards Precedent in the Civil and Common Law Target Groups Researchers, students, and practitioners in the fields of law, economics, and legal philosophy The Author Orlin Yalnazov was born in Varna. He holds a PhD in Law & Economics, awarded jointly by Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Universitat Hamburg, and Universita di Bologna, as well as an LLM from the University of Cambridge and an LLB from Durham University. He works at the University of Hull.
650 0 $a Law and economics. $3 183770
650 1 4 $a Law and Economics. $3 274032
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Okonomische analyse des rechts i economic analysis of law. $3 824689
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24385-2
950 $a Economics and Finance (Springer-41170)