國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Correcting the scholarly record for ...

Dougherty, M. V.

Correcting the scholarly record for research integrityin the aftermath of plagiarism /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Correcting the scholarly record for research integrityby M. V. Dougherty.
Reminder of title:	in the aftermath of plagiarism /
Author:	Dougherty, M. V.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018.
Description:	xv, 248 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Plagiarism.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99435-2
ISBN:	9783319994352$q(electronic bk.)

Correcting the scholarly record for research integrityin the aftermath of plagiarism /
Dougherty, M. V.

Correcting the scholarly record for research integrityin the aftermath of plagiarism /[electronic resource] :by M. V. Dougherty. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018. - xv, 248 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Research ethics forum,v.62212-9529 ;. - Research ethics forum ;v.3..

Preface -- Introduction -- 1. Defining the Scholarly Record -- 2. What is Academic Plagiarism? -- 3. A Test Case for Published Corrections: The Discipline of Philosophy -- 4. Academic Whistleblowing -- 5. Publishing Corrections of the Scholarly Record: Some Test Cases -- 6. Contested Authorship, Self-Plagiarism, and the Scholarly Record -- Conclusion: Beyond the Published Retraction -- Index.

This volume is the first book-length study on post-publication responses to academic plagiarism in humanities disciplines. It demonstrates that the correction of the scholarly literature for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishers alone; each member of the research community has an indispensable role in maintaining the integrity of the published literature in the aftermath of plagiarism. If untreated, academic plagiarism damages the integrity of the scholarly record, corrupts the surrounding academic enterprise, and creates inefficiencies across all levels of knowledge production. By providing case studies from the field of philosophy and related disciplines, the volume exhibits that current post-publication responses to academic plagiarism are insufficient. It catalogues how humanities disciplines fall short in comparison with the natural and biomedical sciences for ensuring the integrity of the body of published research. This volume provides clarity about how to conceptualize the scholarly record, surveys the traditional methods for correcting it, and argues for new interventions to improve the reliability of the body of published research. The book is valuable not only to those in the field of philosophy and other humanities disciplines, but also to those interested in research ethics, meta-science, and the sociology of research.

ISBN: 9783319994352$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-99435-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

366365
Plagiarism.

LC Class. No.: Q180.55.M67 / D68 2018

Dewey Class. No.: 174.95

Correcting the scholarly record for research integrityin the aftermath of plagiarism /
LDR:02855nmm a2200349 a 4500 001 547436
003 DE-He213
005 20181111221151.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 190709s2018 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319994352$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319994345$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-99435-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-99435-2
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a Q180.55.M67 $b D68 2018
072 7 $a HPQ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI005000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTQ $2 thema
072 7 $a PDA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 174.95 $2 23
090 $a Q180.55.M67 $b D732 2018
100 1 $a Dougherty, M. V. $3 528300
245 1 0 $a Correcting the scholarly record for research integrity $h [electronic resource] : $b in the aftermath of plagiarism / $c by M. V. Dougherty.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2018.
300 $a xv, 248 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Research ethics forum, $x 2212-9529 ; $v v.6
505 0 $a Preface -- Introduction -- 1. Defining the Scholarly Record -- 2. What is Academic Plagiarism? -- 3. A Test Case for Published Corrections: The Discipline of Philosophy -- 4. Academic Whistleblowing -- 5. Publishing Corrections of the Scholarly Record: Some Test Cases -- 6. Contested Authorship, Self-Plagiarism, and the Scholarly Record -- Conclusion: Beyond the Published Retraction -- Index.
520 $a This volume is the first book-length study on post-publication responses to academic plagiarism in humanities disciplines. It demonstrates that the correction of the scholarly literature for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishers alone; each member of the research community has an indispensable role in maintaining the integrity of the published literature in the aftermath of plagiarism. If untreated, academic plagiarism damages the integrity of the scholarly record, corrupts the surrounding academic enterprise, and creates inefficiencies across all levels of knowledge production. By providing case studies from the field of philosophy and related disciplines, the volume exhibits that current post-publication responses to academic plagiarism are insufficient. It catalogues how humanities disciplines fall short in comparison with the natural and biomedical sciences for ensuring the integrity of the body of published research. This volume provides clarity about how to conceptualize the scholarly record, surveys the traditional methods for correcting it, and argues for new interventions to improve the reliability of the body of published research. The book is valuable not only to those in the field of philosophy and other humanities disciplines, but also to those interested in research ethics, meta-science, and the sociology of research.
650 0 $a Plagiarism. $3 366365
650 0 $a Research $x Moral and ethical aspects. $3 290515
650 0 $a Science $x Moral and ethical aspects. $3 270794
650 0 $a Integrity. $3 299758
650 1 4 $a Research Ethics. $3 741133
650 2 4 $a Research Skills. $3 815935
650 2 4 $a Printing and Publishing. $3 737991
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Research ethics forum ; $v v.3. $3 766768
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99435-2
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)