國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Voting procedures under a restricted...

Felsenthal, Dan S.

Voting procedures under a restricted domainan examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 voting procedures to five main paradoxes /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Voting procedures under a restricted domainby Dan S. Felsenthal, Hannu Nurmi.
Reminder of title:	an examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 voting procedures to five main paradoxes /
Author:	Felsenthal, Dan S.
other author:	Nurmi, Hannu.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019.
Description:	x, 92 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Voting.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12627-8
ISBN:	9783030126278$q(electronic bk.)

Voting procedures under a restricted domainan examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 voting procedures to five main paradoxes /
Felsenthal, Dan S.

Voting procedures under a restricted domainan examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 voting procedures to five main paradoxes /[electronic resource] :by Dan S. Felsenthal, Hannu Nurmi. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019. - x, 92 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - SpringerBriefs in economics,2191-5504. - SpringerBriefs in economics..

Introduction -- 20 Voting Procedures Designed to Elect a Single Candidate -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Lack of Monotonicity in a Restricted Domain -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Inconsistency Paradox (aka Reinforcement Paradox) in a Restricted Domain -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the No-Show Paradox in a Restricted Domain -- Which of the 20 Voting Procedures Satisfy or Violate the Subset Choice Condition (SCC) in a Restricted Domain? -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Preference Inversion Paradox in a Restricted Domain -- Summary.

This book deals with 20 voting procedures used or proposed for use in elections resulting in the choice of a single winner. These procedures are evaluated in terms of their ability to avoid five important paradoxes in a restricted domain, viz., when a Condorcet winner exists and is elected in the initial profile. Together with the two companion volumes by the same authors, published by Springer in 2017 and 2018, this book aims at giving a comprehensive overview of the most important advantages and disadvantages of voting procedures thereby assisting decision makers in the choice of a voting procedure that would best suit their purposes.

ISBN: 9783030126278$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-12627-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

189679
Voting.

LC Class. No.: JF1001

Dewey Class. No.: 324.65

Voting procedures under a restricted domainan examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 voting procedures to five main paradoxes /
LDR:02372nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 554502
003 DE-He213
005 20190401180155.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 191118s2019 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030126278$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030126261$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-12627-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-12627-8
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a JF1001
072 7 $a KCA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a BUS069030 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a KCA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 324.65 $2 23
090 $a JF1001 $b .F324 2019
100 1 $a Felsenthal, Dan S. $3 559480
245 1 0 $a Voting procedures under a restricted domain $h [electronic resource] : $b an examination of the (In)Vulnerability of 20 voting procedures to five main paradoxes / $c by Dan S. Felsenthal, Hannu Nurmi.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a x, 92 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in economics, $x 2191-5504
505 0 $a Introduction -- 20 Voting Procedures Designed to Elect a Single Candidate -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to Lack of Monotonicity in a Restricted Domain -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Inconsistency Paradox (aka Reinforcement Paradox) in a Restricted Domain -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the No-Show Paradox in a Restricted Domain -- Which of the 20 Voting Procedures Satisfy or Violate the Subset Choice Condition (SCC) in a Restricted Domain? -- The (In)Vulnerability of 20 Voting Procedures to the Preference Inversion Paradox in a Restricted Domain -- Summary.
520 $a This book deals with 20 voting procedures used or proposed for use in elections resulting in the choice of a single winner. These procedures are evaluated in terms of their ability to avoid five important paradoxes in a restricted domain, viz., when a Condorcet winner exists and is elected in the initial profile. Together with the two companion volumes by the same authors, published by Springer in 2017 and 2018, this book aims at giving a comprehensive overview of the most important advantages and disadvantages of voting procedures thereby assisting decision makers in the choice of a voting procedure that would best suit their purposes.
650 0 $a Voting. $3 189679
650 1 4 $a Social Choice/Welfare Economics/Public Choice/Political Economy. $3 823768
650 2 4 $a Electoral Politics. $3 739989
650 2 4 $a Political Philosophy. $3 273774
650 2 4 $a Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods. $3 731081
650 2 4 $a Democracy. $3 174816
700 1 $a Nurmi, Hannu. $3 774454
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in economics. $3 559512
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12627-8
950 $a Economics and Finance (Springer-41170)