國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Toward a new (old) theory of respons...

Koehn, Daryl.

Toward a new (old) theory of responsibilitymoving beyond accountability /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Toward a new (old) theory of responsibilityby Daryl Koehn.
其他題名:	moving beyond accountability /
作者:	Koehn, Daryl.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019.
面頁冊數:	viii, 89 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Responsibility.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16737-0
ISBN:	9783030167370$q(electronic bk.)

Toward a new (old) theory of responsibilitymoving beyond accountability /
Koehn, Daryl.

Toward a new (old) theory of responsibilitymoving beyond accountability /[electronic resource] :by Daryl Koehn. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019. - viii, 89 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - SpringerBriefs in ethics,2211-8101. - SpringerBriefs in ethics..

Chapter 1. Why We Need a New (Old) Idea of Responsibility -- Chapter 2. Intentional Agency Responsibility in the Anglo-American Legal Tradition -- Chapter 3. Jonasian Ontological Responsibility -- Chapter 4. Arendtian Communicative Responsibility -- Chapter 5. Socratic Dialogical Responsibility -- Chapter 6. Conclusion.

This book offers a much needed overview of the neglected notion of responsibility. Instead of offering vague talk about "individual responsibility" or "corporate responsibility," Daryl Koehn examines in detail four accounts of responsibility, taking care to specify what responsibility does and does not mean in each account. She argues for a return to the ancient concept of Socratic dialogical responsibility, a concept that avoids many of the problems inherent in the other accounts. After examining the Anglo-American criminal legal system's treatment of responsibility as intentional agency, she critiques Hans Jonas's concept of responsibility as ontological care and Hannah Arendt's notion of communicative responsibility. She provides a careful analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach to responsibility. The final chapter makes the case for Socratic dialogical responsibility. Dialogical responsibility has many strengths in its own right and avoids the major pitfalls of the other notions of responsibility examined in the book. It serves as an eminently practical way to hold ourselves responsible for our actions and speech. In addition, dialogical responsibility alone qualifies as a virtue integral to the good life.

ISBN: 9783030167370$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-16737-0doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

179265
Responsibility.

LC Class. No.: BJ1451

Dewey Class. No.: 170

Toward a new (old) theory of responsibilitymoving beyond accountability /
LDR:02590nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 554919
003 DE-He213
005 20190329023435.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 191118s2019 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030167370$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030167363$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-16737-0 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-16737-0
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BJ1451
072 7 $a KJG $2 bicssc
072 7 $a BUS008000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a KJG $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 170 $2 23
090 $a BJ1451 $b .K77 2019
100 1 $a Koehn, Daryl. $3 675467
245 1 0 $a Toward a new (old) theory of responsibility $h [electronic resource] : $b moving beyond accountability / $c by Daryl Koehn.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a viii, 89 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in ethics, $x 2211-8101
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Why We Need a New (Old) Idea of Responsibility -- Chapter 2. Intentional Agency Responsibility in the Anglo-American Legal Tradition -- Chapter 3. Jonasian Ontological Responsibility -- Chapter 4. Arendtian Communicative Responsibility -- Chapter 5. Socratic Dialogical Responsibility -- Chapter 6. Conclusion.
520 $a This book offers a much needed overview of the neglected notion of responsibility. Instead of offering vague talk about "individual responsibility" or "corporate responsibility," Daryl Koehn examines in detail four accounts of responsibility, taking care to specify what responsibility does and does not mean in each account. She argues for a return to the ancient concept of Socratic dialogical responsibility, a concept that avoids many of the problems inherent in the other accounts. After examining the Anglo-American criminal legal system's treatment of responsibility as intentional agency, she critiques Hans Jonas's concept of responsibility as ontological care and Hannah Arendt's notion of communicative responsibility. She provides a careful analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach to responsibility. The final chapter makes the case for Socratic dialogical responsibility. Dialogical responsibility has many strengths in its own right and avoids the major pitfalls of the other notions of responsibility examined in the book. It serves as an eminently practical way to hold ourselves responsible for our actions and speech. In addition, dialogical responsibility alone qualifies as a virtue integral to the good life.
650 0 $a Responsibility. $3 179265
650 1 4 $a Business Ethics. $3 731091
650 2 4 $a Moral Philosophy. $3 742115
650 2 4 $a Modern Philosophy. $3 277703
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in ethics. $3 674619
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16737-0
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)