國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Word formation in parallel architect...

Hacken, Pius ten.

Word formation in parallel architecturethe case for a separate component /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Word formation in parallel architectureby Pius ten Hacken.
Reminder of title:	the case for a separate component /
Author:	Hacken, Pius ten.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019.
Description:	vi, 99 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	English languageWord formation.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18009-6
ISBN:	9783030180096$q(electronic bk.)

Word formation in parallel architecturethe case for a separate component /
Hacken, Pius ten.

Word formation in parallel architecturethe case for a separate component /[electronic resource] :by Pius ten Hacken. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019. - vi, 99 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - SpringerBriefs in linguistics,2197-0009. - SpringerBriefs in linguistics..

Introduction -- The Mental Lexicon in Jackendoff's Parallel Architecture -- Morphology in Jackendoff's Parallel Architecture -- Productivity and Onomasiological Coercion -- The Boundaries of Word Formation -- Conclusion.

This book aims to reconcile the generative considerations of Jackendoff's Parallel Architecture (PA) with the European structuralist approach to naming. It shows that there are good reasons to single out word formation as a separate component in PA. It demonstrates that it is a drawback not to distinguish word formation, and explains that the function of word formation rules is different from the function of the lexicon and rules of grammar. After making the argument for a separate word formation component, the book sets out to determine which types of rule qualify as part of this component. Traditionally, the boundaries of word formation with inflection and with syntax have been a matter of debate. By focusing on the naming function, the book poses a guiding principle for determining which rules should be in the word formation component. The position of morphology in the architecture of grammar has always been an issue of debate in generative linguistics. Since Chomsky (1970), this question has been framed in terms of the Lexicalist Hypothesis. Compared to Chomsky's architectures, Jackendoff's Parallel Architecture places phonetic and conceptual structures at the same level as syntactic structure, i.e. connected by bidirectional linking rules rather than interpretation rules. One of the consequences is that PA does not formally distinguish lexicon entries from rules of grammar. This changes the setting for the question of the autonomy of morphology, because the Lexicalist Hypothesis depends on this distinction.

ISBN: 9783030180096$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-18009-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

180620
English language
--Word formation.

LC Class. No.: PE1175 / .H335 2019

Dewey Class. No.: 425

Word formation in parallel architecturethe case for a separate component /
LDR:02792nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 563205
003 DE-He213
005 20190620081824.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 200227s2019 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030180096$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030180089$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-18009-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-18009-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a PE1175 $b .H335 2019
072 7 $a CFK $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAN009020 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a CFK $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 425 $2 23
090 $a PE1175 $b .H118 2019
100 1 $a Hacken, Pius ten. $3 840360
245 1 0 $a Word formation in parallel architecture $h [electronic resource] : $b the case for a separate component / $c by Pius ten Hacken.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a vi, 99 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in linguistics, $x 2197-0009
505 0 $a Introduction -- The Mental Lexicon in Jackendoff's Parallel Architecture -- Morphology in Jackendoff's Parallel Architecture -- Productivity and Onomasiological Coercion -- The Boundaries of Word Formation -- Conclusion.
520 $a This book aims to reconcile the generative considerations of Jackendoff's Parallel Architecture (PA) with the European structuralist approach to naming. It shows that there are good reasons to single out word formation as a separate component in PA. It demonstrates that it is a drawback not to distinguish word formation, and explains that the function of word formation rules is different from the function of the lexicon and rules of grammar. After making the argument for a separate word formation component, the book sets out to determine which types of rule qualify as part of this component. Traditionally, the boundaries of word formation with inflection and with syntax have been a matter of debate. By focusing on the naming function, the book poses a guiding principle for determining which rules should be in the word formation component. The position of morphology in the architecture of grammar has always been an issue of debate in generative linguistics. Since Chomsky (1970), this question has been framed in terms of the Lexicalist Hypothesis. Compared to Chomsky's architectures, Jackendoff's Parallel Architecture places phonetic and conceptual structures at the same level as syntactic structure, i.e. connected by bidirectional linking rules rather than interpretation rules. One of the consequences is that PA does not formally distinguish lexicon entries from rules of grammar. This changes the setting for the question of the autonomy of morphology, because the Lexicalist Hypothesis depends on this distinction.
650 0 $a English language $x Word formation. $3 180620
650 0 $a Onomastics. $3 272151
650 1 4 $a Morphology. $3 222837
650 2 4 $a Grammar. $3 275645
650 2 4 $a Syntax. $3 275646
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in linguistics. $3 736714
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18009-6
950 $a Social Sciences (Springer-41176)