國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Deference to the administration in j...

SpringerLink (Online service)

Deference to the administration in judicial reviewcomparative perspectives /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Deference to the administration in judicial reviewedited by Guobin Zhu.
其他題名:	comparative perspectives /
其他作者:	Zhu, Guobin.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019.
面頁冊數:	xiii, 445 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Judicial review.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31539-9
ISBN:	9783030315399$q(electronic bk.)

Deference to the administration in judicial reviewcomparative perspectives /
Deference to the administration in judicial reviewcomparative perspectives /[electronic resource] :edited by Guobin Zhu. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019. - xiii, 445 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Ius comparatum - global studies in comparative law,v.392214-6881 ;. - Ius comparatum ;v.3..

This book investigates judicial deference to the administration in judicial review, a concept and legal practice that can be found to a greater or lesser degree in every constitutional system. In each system, deference functions differently, because the positioning of the judiciary with regard to the separation of powers, the role of the courts as a mechanism of checks and balances, and the scope of judicial review differ. In addition, the way deference works within the constitutional system itself is complex, multi-faceted and often covert. Although judicial deference to the administration is a topical theme in comparative administrative law, a general examination of national systems is still lacking. As such, a theoretical and empirical review is called for. Accordingly, this book presents national reports from 15 jurisdictions, ranging from Argentina, Canada and the US, to the EU. Constituting the outcome of the 20th General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, held in Fukuoka, Japan in July 2018, it offers a valuable and unique resource for the study of comparative administrative law.

ISBN: 9783030315399$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-31539-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

235818
Judicial review.

LC Class. No.: K2100 / .D44 2019

Dewey Class. No.: 347.01

Deference to the administration in judicial reviewcomparative perspectives /
LDR:02209nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 569560
003 DE-He213
005 20191123141238.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 200723s2019 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030315399$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030315382$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-31539-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-31539-9
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K2100 $b .D44 2019
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 347.01 $2 23
090 $a K2100 $b .D313 2019
245 0 0 $a Deference to the administration in judicial review $h [electronic resource] : $b comparative perspectives / $c edited by Guobin Zhu.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a xiii, 445 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Ius comparatum - global studies in comparative law, $x 2214-6881 ; $v v.39
520 $a This book investigates judicial deference to the administration in judicial review, a concept and legal practice that can be found to a greater or lesser degree in every constitutional system. In each system, deference functions differently, because the positioning of the judiciary with regard to the separation of powers, the role of the courts as a mechanism of checks and balances, and the scope of judicial review differ. In addition, the way deference works within the constitutional system itself is complex, multi-faceted and often covert. Although judicial deference to the administration is a topical theme in comparative administrative law, a general examination of national systems is still lacking. As such, a theoretical and empirical review is called for. Accordingly, this book presents national reports from 15 jurisdictions, ranging from Argentina, Canada and the US, to the EU. Constituting the outcome of the 20th General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, held in Fukuoka, Japan in July 2018, it offers a valuable and unique resource for the study of comparative administrative law.
650 0 $a Judicial review. $3 235818
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 530877
650 2 4 $a Constitutional Law. $3 307719
650 2 4 $a Administrative Law. $3 277086
700 1 $a Zhu, Guobin. $3 855592
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Ius comparatum ; $v v.3. $3 724974
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31539-9
950 $a Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)