國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

An Analysis of the Results of Court ...

Birren, Genevieve F. E.

An Analysis of the Results of Court of Arbitration for Sports Doping Awards Involving Athletes between 1994 and 2008.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	An Analysis of the Results of Court of Arbitration for Sports Doping Awards Involving Athletes between 1994 and 2008.
Author:	Birren, Genevieve F. E.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018
Description:	133 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.
Notes:	Advisor: Seidler, Todd.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-03A.
Subject:	Sports management.
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10843021
ISBN:	9781085776608

An Analysis of the Results of Court of Arbitration for Sports Doping Awards Involving Athletes between 1994 and 2008.
Birren, Genevieve F. E.

An Analysis of the Results of Court of Arbitration for Sports Doping Awards Involving Athletes between 1994 and 2008. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 133 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of New Mexico, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this study was to create a database of Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) awards coded for a variety of factors and then examine those factors to determine whether they had any relationship to the outcome of the CAS awards involving athletes and doping. The initial pool of awards was downloaded from the CAS website and then each award was read and coded for certain information, specifically case name, year, date decided, division, sport, party role, party name, issue, rule applied, sex, decision, and arbitrators deciding. Once this coding was complete the result was a database of 216 CAS awards. All awards that had doping as the issue were then selected for analysis to see what factors had a relationship with the final decision in the award. Using descriptive statistics and case study analysis, the results indicate that there are differences in award outcomes between different sports, the sexes, who the arbitrators are, and the type of doping involved, among others, suggesting some potential bias in CAS decisions. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.

ISBN: 9781085776608Subjects--Topical Terms:

857307
Sports management.

An Analysis of the Results of Court of Arbitration for Sports Doping Awards Involving Athletes between 1994 and 2008.
LDR:02122nmm a2200301 4500 001 570679
005 20200514111937.5
008 200901s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781085776608
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10843021
035 $a AAI10843021
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Birren, Genevieve F. E. $3 857305
245 1 3 $a An Analysis of the Results of Court of Arbitration for Sports Doping Awards Involving Athletes between 1994 and 2008.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 133 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Seidler, Todd.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of New Mexico, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to create a database of Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) awards coded for a variety of factors and then examine those factors to determine whether they had any relationship to the outcome of the CAS awards involving athletes and doping. The initial pool of awards was downloaded from the CAS website and then each award was read and coded for certain information, specifically case name, year, date decided, division, sport, party role, party name, issue, rule applied, sex, decision, and arbitrators deciding. Once this coding was complete the result was a database of 216 CAS awards. All awards that had doping as the issue were then selected for analysis to see what factors had a relationship with the final decision in the award. Using descriptive statistics and case study analysis, the results indicate that there are differences in award outcomes between different sports, the sexes, who the arbitrators are, and the type of doping involved, among others, suggesting some potential bias in CAS decisions. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0142.
650 4 $a Sports management. $3 857307
650 4 $a Law. $3 207600
690 $a 0430
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a The University of New Mexico. $b Physical Education, Sports and Exercise Sciences. $3 857306
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-03A.
790 $a 0142
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10843021