國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An African ethics of personhood and ...

Molefe, Motsamai.

An African ethics of personhood and bioethicsa reflection on abortion and euthanasia /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An African ethics of personhood and bioethicsby Motsamai Molefe.
其他題名:	a reflection on abortion and euthanasia /
作者:	Molefe, Motsamai.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020.
面頁冊數:	xiii, 136 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	BioethicsAfrica.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46519-3
ISBN:	9783030465193$q(electronic bk.)

An African ethics of personhood and bioethicsa reflection on abortion and euthanasia /
Molefe, Motsamai.

An African ethics of personhood and bioethicsa reflection on abortion and euthanasia /[electronic resource] :by Motsamai Molefe. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020. - xiii, 136 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Chapter 1: Introduction: Personhood, Dignity and (African) Bioethics -- Chapter 2: Personhood, Morality and Dignity in African Philosophy -- Chapter 3: Personhood and Abortion in African Philosophy -- Chapter 4: Personhood and Euthanasia in African Philosophy.

This book articulates an African conception of dignity in light of the salient axiological category of personhood in African cultures. The idea of personhood embodies a moral system for evaluating human lives exuding with virtue or ones that are morally excellent. This book argues that this idea of personhood embodies an under-explored conception of dignity, which accounts for it in terms of our capacity for the virtue of sympathy. It then proceeds to apply this personhood-based conception of dignity to bioethical questions, specifically, those of abortion and euthanasia. Regarding abortion, it concludes that it is impermissible since foetuses possess partial moral status. Regarding euthanasia, it argues that it is permissible for reasons revolving around avoiding the reversing of personhood. It also, though, minimally, touches on the questions regarding the mentally disabled and animals, to which it assigns lower moral status.

ISBN: 9783030465193$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-46519-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

621078
Bioethics
--Africa.

LC Class. No.: QH332 / .M654 2020

Dewey Class. No.: 174.2

An African ethics of personhood and bioethicsa reflection on abortion and euthanasia /
LDR:02143nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 580037
003 DE-He213
005 20200530151119.0
006 m
007 cr
008 201229s2020
020 $a 9783030465193$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030465186$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-46519-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-46519-3
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a QH332 $b .M654 2020
072 7 $a HPD $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI003000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDH $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 174.2 $2 23
090 $a QH332 $b .M718 2020
100 1 $a Molefe, Motsamai. $3 836862
245 1 3 $a An African ethics of personhood and bioethics $h [electronic resource] : $b a reflection on abortion and euthanasia / $c by Motsamai Molefe.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2020.
300 $a xiii, 136 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Chapter 1: Introduction: Personhood, Dignity and (African) Bioethics -- Chapter 2: Personhood, Morality and Dignity in African Philosophy -- Chapter 3: Personhood and Abortion in African Philosophy -- Chapter 4: Personhood and Euthanasia in African Philosophy.
520 $a This book articulates an African conception of dignity in light of the salient axiological category of personhood in African cultures. The idea of personhood embodies a moral system for evaluating human lives exuding with virtue or ones that are morally excellent. This book argues that this idea of personhood embodies an under-explored conception of dignity, which accounts for it in terms of our capacity for the virtue of sympathy. It then proceeds to apply this personhood-based conception of dignity to bioethical questions, specifically, those of abortion and euthanasia. Regarding abortion, it concludes that it is impermissible since foetuses possess partial moral status. Regarding euthanasia, it argues that it is permissible for reasons revolving around avoiding the reversing of personhood. It also, though, minimally, touches on the questions regarding the mentally disabled and animals, to which it assigns lower moral status.
650 0 $a Bioethics $z Africa. $3 621078
650 0 $a Medical ethics $z Africa. $3 683911
650 1 4 $a Non-Western Philosophy. $3 338771
650 2 4 $a Bioethics. $3 195040
650 2 4 $a Moral Philosophy. $3 742115
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46519-3
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)