國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Stepped care 2.0a paradigm shift in ...

Cornish, Peter.

Stepped care 2.0a paradigm shift in mental health /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Stepped care 2.0by Peter Cornish.
Reminder of title:	a paradigm shift in mental health /
Author:	Cornish, Peter.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020.
Description:	xv, 137 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Mental health services.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48055-4
ISBN:	9783030480554$q(electronic bk.)

Stepped care 2.0a paradigm shift in mental health /
Cornish, Peter.

Stepped care 2.0a paradigm shift in mental health /[electronic resource] :by Peter Cornish. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020. - xv, 137 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Chapter 1. We Need a Better System -- Chapter 2. Open Access -- Chapter 3. Recovery Values and Principles -- Chapter 4. Expanding the Options Through Nine Steps -- Chapter 5. Navigating the System -- Chapter 6. Collaboration & Co-Design -- Chapter 7. Adapting for Unique Settings -- Chapter 8. Towards a Paradigm Shift.

This book is a primer on Stepped Care 2.0. It is the first book in a series of three. This primer addresses the increased demand for mental health care by supporting stakeholders (help-seekers, providers, and policy-makers) to collaborate in enhancing care outcomes through work that is both more meaningful and sustainable. Our current mental health system is organized to offer highly intensive psychiatric and psychological care. While undoubtedly effective, demand far exceeds the supply for such specialized programming. Many people seeking to improve their mental health do not need psychiatric medication or sophisticated psychotherapy. A typical help seeker needs basic support. For knee pain, a nurse or physician might first recommend icing and resting the knee, working to achieve a healthy weight, and introducing low impact exercise before considering specialist care. Unfortunately, there is no parallel continuum of care for mental health and wellness. As a result, a person seeking the most basic support must line up and wait for the specialist along with those who may have very severe and/or complex needs. Why are there no lower intensity options? One reason is fear and stigma. A thorough assessment by a specialist is considered best practice. After all, what if we miss signs of suicide or potential harm to others? A reasonable question on the surface; however, the premise is flawed. First, the risk of suicide, or threat to others, for those already seeking care, is low. Second, our technical capacity to predict on these threats is virtually nil. Finally, assessment in our current culture of fear tends to focus more on the identification of deficits (as opposed to functional capacities), leading to over-prescription of expensive remedies and lost opportunities for autonomy and self-management. Despite little evidence linking assessment to treatment outcomes, and no evidence supporting our capacity to detect risk for harm, we persist with lengthy intake assessments and automatic specialist referrals that delay care. Before providers and policy makers can feel comfortable letting go of risk assessment, however, they need to understand the forces underlying the risk paradigm that dominates our society and restricts creative solutions for supporting those in need. SC2.0 reimagines the original UK stepped care model by integrating a range of traditional and emerging online mental health programs systematically within the context of recovery principles and practice. SC2.0 prevents problems from escalating into serious conditions by systematizing shared responsibility for accessing care options at the right time, with the right people, in the right context. Program matching decisions in SC2.0 are also more flexible and client-centric: Rather than stepping only according to diagnosis or symptom severity, one or more options of varying intensity can be jointly selected based on client need, preference, functioning, and readiness for engaging in healing work.

ISBN: 9783030480554$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-48055-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

252350
Mental health services.

LC Class. No.: RA790.5 / .C676 2020

Dewey Class. No.: 362.2

Stepped care 2.0a paradigm shift in mental health /
LDR:04245nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 580285
003 DE-He213
005 20201023145140.0
006 m
007 cr
008 210105s2020
020 $a 9783030480554$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030480547$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-48055-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-48055-4
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a RA790.5 $b .C676 2020
072 7 $a MBNH9 $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PSY003000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a MBNH9 $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 362.2 $2 23
090 $a RA790.5 $b .C818 2020
100 1 $a Cornish, Peter. $3 870096
245 1 0 $a Stepped care 2.0 $h [electronic resource] : $b a paradigm shift in mental health / $c by Peter Cornish.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2020.
300 $a xv, 137 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Chapter 1. We Need a Better System -- Chapter 2. Open Access -- Chapter 3. Recovery Values and Principles -- Chapter 4. Expanding the Options Through Nine Steps -- Chapter 5. Navigating the System -- Chapter 6. Collaboration & Co-Design -- Chapter 7. Adapting for Unique Settings -- Chapter 8. Towards a Paradigm Shift.
520 $a This book is a primer on Stepped Care 2.0. It is the first book in a series of three. This primer addresses the increased demand for mental health care by supporting stakeholders (help-seekers, providers, and policy-makers) to collaborate in enhancing care outcomes through work that is both more meaningful and sustainable. Our current mental health system is organized to offer highly intensive psychiatric and psychological care. While undoubtedly effective, demand far exceeds the supply for such specialized programming. Many people seeking to improve their mental health do not need psychiatric medication or sophisticated psychotherapy. A typical help seeker needs basic support. For knee pain, a nurse or physician might first recommend icing and resting the knee, working to achieve a healthy weight, and introducing low impact exercise before considering specialist care. Unfortunately, there is no parallel continuum of care for mental health and wellness. As a result, a person seeking the most basic support must line up and wait for the specialist along with those who may have very severe and/or complex needs. Why are there no lower intensity options? One reason is fear and stigma. A thorough assessment by a specialist is considered best practice. After all, what if we miss signs of suicide or potential harm to others? A reasonable question on the surface; however, the premise is flawed. First, the risk of suicide, or threat to others, for those already seeking care, is low. Second, our technical capacity to predict on these threats is virtually nil. Finally, assessment in our current culture of fear tends to focus more on the identification of deficits (as opposed to functional capacities), leading to over-prescription of expensive remedies and lost opportunities for autonomy and self-management. Despite little evidence linking assessment to treatment outcomes, and no evidence supporting our capacity to detect risk for harm, we persist with lengthy intake assessments and automatic specialist referrals that delay care. Before providers and policy makers can feel comfortable letting go of risk assessment, however, they need to understand the forces underlying the risk paradigm that dominates our society and restricts creative solutions for supporting those in need. SC2.0 reimagines the original UK stepped care model by integrating a range of traditional and emerging online mental health programs systematically within the context of recovery principles and practice. SC2.0 prevents problems from escalating into serious conditions by systematizing shared responsibility for accessing care options at the right time, with the right people, in the right context. Program matching decisions in SC2.0 are also more flexible and client-centric: Rather than stepping only according to diagnosis or symptom severity, one or more options of varying intensity can be jointly selected based on client need, preference, functioning, and readiness for engaging in healing work.
650 0 $a Mental health services. $3 252350
650 1 4 $a Health Psychology. $3 274221
650 2 4 $a Behavioral Therapy. $3 273860
650 2 4 $a Psychotherapy and Counseling. $3 309635
650 2 4 $a Psychiatry. $3 201470
650 2 4 $a Neuropsychology. $3 188060
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48055-4
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (Springer-41168)