國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Permanent investment courtsthe Europ...

Dothan, Shai.

Permanent investment courtsthe European experiment /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Permanent investment courtsedited by Gunes Unuvar, Joanna Lam, Shai Dothan.
其他題名:	the European experiment /
其他作者:	Unuvar, Gunes.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020.
面頁冊數:	ix, 150 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	InvestmentsLaw and legislationEurope.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45684-9
ISBN:	9783030456849$q(electronic bk.)

Permanent investment courtsthe European experiment /
Permanent investment courtsthe European experiment /[electronic resource] :edited by Gunes Unuvar, Joanna Lam, Shai Dothan. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020. - ix, 150 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - European yearbook of international economic law, Special issue. - European yearbook of international economic law.Special issue..

Shai Dothan and Joanna Lam, A Paradigm Shift? Arbitration and Court-Like Mechanisms in Investors' Disputes -- Eleftheria Neframi, Permanent Investment Courts from the Perspective of the EU Legal Order -- Armand de Mestral and Lukas Vanhonnaeker, The North American Experience with Investor-State Arbitration: Does it lead to a Permanent Investment Court? -- Marc Bungenberg and Anna M. Holzer, Potential Enforcement Mechanisms for Decisions of a Multilateral Investment Court -- Gunes Unuvar and Tim Kreft, Impossible Ethics? An Analysis of the Rules on Ethics and Qualifications of Investment Court Judges.

This special issue focuses on the opportunities and challenges connected with investment courts. The creation of permanent investment courts was first proposed several decades ago, but it has only recently become likely that these proposals will be implemented. In particular, the European Commission has pushed for a court-like mechanism to resolve investment disputes in various recent trade and investment negotiations. Such a framework was included in some free trade agreements (FTAs) and investment protection agreements (IPAs) the European Union (EU) signed or negotiated with Vietnam, Singapore, Mexico and Canada. While it was shelved long before the publication of this Special Issue, the European Commission had also formally proposed a court system during the negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreement with the United States. The issue of a Multilateral Investment Court (MIC) has also been prevalent at the Working Group III proceedings of the UNCITRAL on investor-State dispute settlement reform, attracting scholarly and public attention. Will these developments lead to the creation of permanent investment courts? How will such courts change the future of international investment law? Will they bring about a real institutional change in adjudicatory mechanisms? Will they introduce a 'hybrid' system, which borrows important characteristics from both arbitration and institutional methods of international adjudication? How will the enforcement mechanisms work, and under which rules of ethics will its adjudicators function and exercise their duties? This special issue brings together leading scholars sharing a common interest in investment courts to address these questions.

ISBN: 9783030456849$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-45684-9doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

320667
Investments
--Law and legislation--Europe.

LC Class. No.: KJC2250 / .P47 2020

Dewey Class. No.: 346.40922

Permanent investment courtsthe European experiment /
LDR:03436nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 586168
003 DE-He213
005 20210107152027.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 210323s2020 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030456849$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030456832$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-45684-9 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-45684-9
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KJC2250 $b .P47 2020
072 7 $a LBBM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LBBM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 346.40922 $2 23
090 $a KJC2250 $b .P451 2020
245 0 0 $a Permanent investment courts $h [electronic resource] : $b the European experiment / $c edited by Gunes Unuvar, Joanna Lam, Shai Dothan.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2020.
300 $a ix, 150 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a European yearbook of international economic law, Special issue
505 0 $a Shai Dothan and Joanna Lam, A Paradigm Shift? Arbitration and Court-Like Mechanisms in Investors' Disputes -- Eleftheria Neframi, Permanent Investment Courts from the Perspective of the EU Legal Order -- Armand de Mestral and Lukas Vanhonnaeker, The North American Experience with Investor-State Arbitration: Does it lead to a Permanent Investment Court? -- Marc Bungenberg and Anna M. Holzer, Potential Enforcement Mechanisms for Decisions of a Multilateral Investment Court -- Gunes Unuvar and Tim Kreft, Impossible Ethics? An Analysis of the Rules on Ethics and Qualifications of Investment Court Judges.
520 $a This special issue focuses on the opportunities and challenges connected with investment courts. The creation of permanent investment courts was first proposed several decades ago, but it has only recently become likely that these proposals will be implemented. In particular, the European Commission has pushed for a court-like mechanism to resolve investment disputes in various recent trade and investment negotiations. Such a framework was included in some free trade agreements (FTAs) and investment protection agreements (IPAs) the European Union (EU) signed or negotiated with Vietnam, Singapore, Mexico and Canada. While it was shelved long before the publication of this Special Issue, the European Commission had also formally proposed a court system during the negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreement with the United States. The issue of a Multilateral Investment Court (MIC) has also been prevalent at the Working Group III proceedings of the UNCITRAL on investor-State dispute settlement reform, attracting scholarly and public attention. Will these developments lead to the creation of permanent investment courts? How will such courts change the future of international investment law? Will they bring about a real institutional change in adjudicatory mechanisms? Will they introduce a 'hybrid' system, which borrows important characteristics from both arbitration and institutional methods of international adjudication? How will the enforcement mechanisms work, and under which rules of ethics will its adjudicators function and exercise their duties? This special issue brings together leading scholars sharing a common interest in investment courts to address these questions.
650 0 $a Investments $x Law and legislation $z Europe. $3 320667
650 1 4 $a International Economic Law, Trade Law. $3 558716
650 2 4 $a European Economic Law. $3 848282
650 2 4 $a European Union Politics. $3 739871
700 1 $a Unuvar, Gunes. $3 877492
700 1 $a Lam, Joanna. $3 877493
700 1 $a Dothan, Shai. $3 877494
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a European yearbook of international economic law. $p Special issue. $3 869251
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45684-9
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)