國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Does neuroscience have normative imp...

Hildt, Elisabeth.

Does neuroscience have normative implications?

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Does neuroscience have normative implications?edited by Geoffrey S. Holtzman, Elisabeth Hildt.
other author:	Holtzman, Geoffrey S.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020.
Description:	xv, 211 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	NeurosciencesMoral and ethical aspects.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5
ISBN:	9783030561345$q(electronic bk.)

Does neuroscience have normative implications?
Does neuroscience have normative implications?[electronic resource] /edited by Geoffrey S. Holtzman, Elisabeth Hildt. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020. - xv, 211 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - The international library of ethics, law and technology,v.221875-0044 ;. - International library of ethics, law and technology ;v.14..

1. The Neuroscience of Human Morality: Three Levels of Normative Implications (Jon Leefmann) -- 2. Moral Responsibility and Perceived Threats from Neuroscience (Myrto Mylopoulos) -- 3. Lessons for Ethics from the Science of Pain (Jennifer Corns and Robert Cowan) -- 4. Two Theories of Moral Cognition (Julia Haas) -- 5. Rethinking Moral Motivation: How Neuroscience Supports an Alternative to Motivation Internalism (Chris Zarpentine) -- 6. The Reactive Roots of Retribution: Normative Implications of the Neuroscience of Punishment (Isaac Wiegman) -- 7. Normative Implications of Neuroscience and Sociobiology - Intended and Perceived (Ullica Segerstrale) -- 8. Nervous Norms (Matthew Ruble) -- 9. Neuromodulation of the "Moral Brain" - Evaluating Bridges Between Neural Foundations of Moral Capacities and Normative Aims of the Intervention (Christian Ineichen and Markus Christen) -- 10. Autistic Moral Agency and Integrative Neuroethics (Bongrae Seok)

This book brings together a number of essays that are optimistic about the ways certain neuroscientific insights might advance philosophical ethics, and other essays that are more circumspect about the relevance of neuroscience to philosophical ethics. As a whole, the essays form a self-reflective body of work that simultaneously seeks to derive normative ethical implications from neuroscience, and to question whether and how that may be possible at all. In doing so, the collection brings together psychology, neuroscience, philosophy of mind, ethics, and philosophy of science. Neuroscience seeks to understand the biological systems that guide human behavior and cognition. Normative ethics, on the other hand, seeks to understand the system of abstract moral principles dictating how people ought to behave. By studying how the human brain makes moral judgments, can philosophers learn anything about the nature of morality itself? A growing number of researchers believe that neuroscience can, indeed, provide insights into the questions of philosophical ethics. However, even these advocates acknowledge that the path from neuroscientific is to normative ethical ought can be quite fraught.

ISBN: 9783030561345$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

570858
Neurosciences
--Moral and ethical aspects.

LC Class. No.: RC343

Dewey Class. No.: 174.2928

Does neuroscience have normative implications?
LDR:03236nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 589110
003 DE-He213
005 20210208152710.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 210525s2020 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030561345$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030561338$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-56134-5
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a RC343
072 7 $a HPQ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI005000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTQ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 174.2928 $2 23
090 $a RC343 $b .D653 2020
245 0 0 $a Does neuroscience have normative implications? $h [electronic resource] / $c edited by Geoffrey S. Holtzman, Elisabeth Hildt.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2020.
300 $a xv, 211 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a The international library of ethics, law and technology, $x 1875-0044 ; $v v.22
505 0 $a 1. The Neuroscience of Human Morality: Three Levels of Normative Implications (Jon Leefmann) -- 2. Moral Responsibility and Perceived Threats from Neuroscience (Myrto Mylopoulos) -- 3. Lessons for Ethics from the Science of Pain (Jennifer Corns and Robert Cowan) -- 4. Two Theories of Moral Cognition (Julia Haas) -- 5. Rethinking Moral Motivation: How Neuroscience Supports an Alternative to Motivation Internalism (Chris Zarpentine) -- 6. The Reactive Roots of Retribution: Normative Implications of the Neuroscience of Punishment (Isaac Wiegman) -- 7. Normative Implications of Neuroscience and Sociobiology - Intended and Perceived (Ullica Segerstrale) -- 8. Nervous Norms (Matthew Ruble) -- 9. Neuromodulation of the "Moral Brain" - Evaluating Bridges Between Neural Foundations of Moral Capacities and Normative Aims of the Intervention (Christian Ineichen and Markus Christen) -- 10. Autistic Moral Agency and Integrative Neuroethics (Bongrae Seok)
520 $a This book brings together a number of essays that are optimistic about the ways certain neuroscientific insights might advance philosophical ethics, and other essays that are more circumspect about the relevance of neuroscience to philosophical ethics. As a whole, the essays form a self-reflective body of work that simultaneously seeks to derive normative ethical implications from neuroscience, and to question whether and how that may be possible at all. In doing so, the collection brings together psychology, neuroscience, philosophy of mind, ethics, and philosophy of science. Neuroscience seeks to understand the biological systems that guide human behavior and cognition. Normative ethics, on the other hand, seeks to understand the system of abstract moral principles dictating how people ought to behave. By studying how the human brain makes moral judgments, can philosophers learn anything about the nature of morality itself? A growing number of researchers believe that neuroscience can, indeed, provide insights into the questions of philosophical ethics. However, even these advocates acknowledge that the path from neuroscientific is to normative ethical ought can be quite fraught.
650 0 $a Neurosciences $x Moral and ethical aspects. $3 570858
650 0 $a Neurosciences $x Philosophy. $3 292903
650 0 $a Normativity (Ethics) $3 321672
650 1 4 $a Moral Philosophy. $3 742115
650 2 4 $a Bioethics. $3 195040
650 2 4 $a Neurosciences. $3 211508
650 2 4 $a Cognitive Psychology. $3 273717
700 1 $a Holtzman, Geoffrey S. $3 880819
700 1 $a Hildt, Elisabeth. $3 514102
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a International library of ethics, law and technology ; $v v.14. $3 713843
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)