國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Block Periodization Programming: Eff...

East Tennessee State University.

Block Periodization Programming: Efficacy in Subjects of Differing Strength Levels.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Block Periodization Programming: Efficacy in Subjects of Differing Strength Levels.
Author:	Moquin, Paul A.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020
Description:	119 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: B.
Notes:	Advisor: Stone, Michael;Fry, Andrew;Hornsby, William;Carroll, Kevin.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-05B.
Subject:	Kinesiology.
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28268635
ISBN:	9798684693007

Block Periodization Programming: Efficacy in Subjects of Differing Strength Levels.
Moquin, Paul A.

Block Periodization Programming: Efficacy in Subjects of Differing Strength Levels. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 119 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--East Tennessee State University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Physiological muscle adaptations due to resistance training are still not fully known. The rate and area of hypertrophy could drastically help or hinder athletic performance. The purpose of this study was to observe the changes in lean body mass (and related factors), relative allometrically scaled strength and absolute strength through an 11-week block periodized resistance training program. The subjects (n = 15) realized an increase in total body water (pre = 49.77Kg; post = 51.70Kg), lean body mass (pre = 67.98Kg; post = 70.63Kg), adjusted lean body mass (pre = 20.35Kg; post = 21.03Kg) and cross sectional area (pre = 32.73 cm2; post = 36.33cm2). Subjects (n= 15) were divided into either a strong (1 RM ≥ 1.75x body weight), moderate (1 RM = ≥ 1.25-1.74x body weight), or weak (1 RM < 1.25x body weight) group and data were analyzed in pre-post training. While all subjects showed gains in LBM and related factors, initial strength levels altered these adaptations. Subjects with a lower initial maximum strength level tended to make greater gains. However, due to the increase in total body water and relatively small increases in adjusted LBM, it appears, among this group, that little myofibrillar hypertrophy occurred during this short training period. These data suggest that greater accuracy for measures of alterations in LBM and related factors may require measures of total body water.

ISBN: 9798684693007Subjects--Topical Terms:

203232
Kinesiology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

strength training

Block Periodization Programming: Efficacy in Subjects of Differing Strength Levels.
LDR:02595nmm a2200349 4500 001 594656
005 20210521101717.5
008 210917s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798684693007
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28268635
035 $a (MiAaPQ)EastTennessee5301
035 $a AAI28268635
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Moquin, Paul A. $3 886719
245 1 0 $a Block Periodization Programming: Efficacy in Subjects of Differing Strength Levels.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 119 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Stone, Michael;Fry, Andrew;Hornsby, William;Carroll, Kevin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--East Tennessee State University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Physiological muscle adaptations due to resistance training are still not fully known. The rate and area of hypertrophy could drastically help or hinder athletic performance. The purpose of this study was to observe the changes in lean body mass (and related factors), relative allometrically scaled strength and absolute strength through an 11-week block periodized resistance training program. The subjects (n = 15) realized an increase in total body water (pre = 49.77Kg; post = 51.70Kg), lean body mass (pre = 67.98Kg; post = 70.63Kg), adjusted lean body mass (pre = 20.35Kg; post = 21.03Kg) and cross sectional area (pre = 32.73 cm2; post = 36.33cm2). Subjects (n= 15) were divided into either a strong (1 RM ≥ 1.75x body weight), moderate (1 RM = ≥ 1.25-1.74x body weight), or weak (1 RM < 1.25x body weight) group and data were analyzed in pre-post training. While all subjects showed gains in LBM and related factors, initial strength levels altered these adaptations. Subjects with a lower initial maximum strength level tended to make greater gains. However, due to the increase in total body water and relatively small increases in adjusted LBM, it appears, among this group, that little myofibrillar hypertrophy occurred during this short training period. These data suggest that greater accuracy for measures of alterations in LBM and related factors may require measures of total body water.
590 $a School code: 0069.
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 203232
653 $a strength training
653 $a lean body mass
653 $a resistance training
653 $a hypertrophy
690 $a 0575
710 2 $a East Tennessee State University. $3 212799
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-05B.
790 $a 0069
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28268635