國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Third party funding for dispute reso...

SpringerLink (Online service)

Third party funding for dispute resolutiona comparative study of England, Hong Kong, Singapore, the Netherlands, and Mainland China /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Third party funding for dispute resolutionby Beibei Zhang.
Reminder of title:	a comparative study of England, Hong Kong, Singapore, the Netherlands, and Mainland China /
Author:	Zhang, Beibei.
Published:	Singapore :Springer Singapore :2021.
Description:	xvi, 232 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Third party litigation funding.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1095-0
ISBN:	9789811610950$q(electronic bk.)

Third party funding for dispute resolutiona comparative study of England, Hong Kong, Singapore, the Netherlands, and Mainland China /
Zhang, Beibei.

Third party funding for dispute resolutiona comparative study of England, Hong Kong, Singapore, the Netherlands, and Mainland China /[electronic resource] :by Beibei Zhang. - Singapore :Springer Singapore :2021. - xvi, 232 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. TPF in England -- Chapter 3. TPF in Hong Kong -- Chapter 4. TPF in Singapore -- Chapter 5. TPF in the Netherlands -- Chapter 6. TPF in China -- Chapter 7. Conclusions.

This book represents a comparative study of Third Party Funding (TPF) and its regulation in England, Hong Kong, Singapore, the Netherlands and the Mainland of China. It provides a general review of the background in which TPF grows and the platform where third party funders are allowed to operate. In each and every chosen jurisdiction, the book analyses the legal risks related to TPF, the regulatory measures and the questions surrounding the challenges that lay ahead. This book is featured by the empirical study of the Chinese TPF market. As of the time of this writing, TPF activities operating in China have not been expanded upon in English or Chinese literature. The language barrier may be one reason. The lack of empirical materials may also contribute to this situation. In order to obtain some first-hand evidence of the TPF market in China, the author conducted empirical research in Shenzhen, with the assistance of Chinese third party funders and some local organizations and authorities. The empirical study took the form of questionnaire surveys. The first survey saw in total 175 responses, and the second saw 18 responses. Due to the fact that many funding arrangements for commercial disputes are kept in the dark, it is hard, if not impossible, to measure the size of the Chinese TPF market. This study provides a dataset that serves a humble purpose; namely to offer an insight into the Chinese TPF market, rather than to grasp the full picture of the industry.

ISBN: 9789811610950$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-981-16-1095-0doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

779875
Third party litigation funding.

LC Class. No.: K124.T55 / Z43 2021

Dewey Class. No.: 347.052

Third party funding for dispute resolutiona comparative study of England, Hong Kong, Singapore, the Netherlands, and Mainland China /
LDR:02775nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 599657
003 DE-He213
005 20210713155831.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 211027s2021 si s 0 eng d
020 $a 9789811610950$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9789811610943$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-981-16-1095-0 $2 doi
035 $a 978-981-16-1095-0
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K124.T55 $b Z43 2021
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 347.052 $2 23
090 $a K124.T55 $b Z63 2021
100 1 $a Zhang, Beibei. $3 893856
245 1 0 $a Third party funding for dispute resolution $h [electronic resource] : $b a comparative study of England, Hong Kong, Singapore, the Netherlands, and Mainland China / $c by Beibei Zhang.
260 $a Singapore : $b Springer Singapore : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2021.
300 $a xvi, 232 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. TPF in England -- Chapter 3. TPF in Hong Kong -- Chapter 4. TPF in Singapore -- Chapter 5. TPF in the Netherlands -- Chapter 6. TPF in China -- Chapter 7. Conclusions.
520 $a This book represents a comparative study of Third Party Funding (TPF) and its regulation in England, Hong Kong, Singapore, the Netherlands and the Mainland of China. It provides a general review of the background in which TPF grows and the platform where third party funders are allowed to operate. In each and every chosen jurisdiction, the book analyses the legal risks related to TPF, the regulatory measures and the questions surrounding the challenges that lay ahead. This book is featured by the empirical study of the Chinese TPF market. As of the time of this writing, TPF activities operating in China have not been expanded upon in English or Chinese literature. The language barrier may be one reason. The lack of empirical materials may also contribute to this situation. In order to obtain some first-hand evidence of the TPF market in China, the author conducted empirical research in Shenzhen, with the assistance of Chinese third party funders and some local organizations and authorities. The empirical study took the form of questionnaire surveys. The first survey saw in total 175 responses, and the second saw 18 responses. Due to the fact that many funding arrangements for commercial disputes are kept in the dark, it is hard, if not impossible, to measure the size of the Chinese TPF market. This study provides a dataset that serves a humble purpose; namely to offer an insight into the Chinese TPF market, rather than to grasp the full picture of the industry.
650 0 $a Third party litigation funding. $3 779875
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 530877
650 2 4 $a Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration. $3 558745
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1095-0
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)