國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Early utilitarianslives and ideals /

Binmore, Ken.

Early utilitarianslives and ideals /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Early utilitariansby Ken Binmore.
其他題名:	lives and ideals /
作者:	Binmore, Ken.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2021.
面頁冊數:	ix, 95 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Utilitarianism.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74583-7
ISBN:	9783030745837$q(electronic bk.)

Early utilitarianslives and ideals /
Binmore, Ken.

Early utilitarianslives and ideals /[electronic resource] :by Ken Binmore. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2021. - ix, 95 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Introduction -- Shaftesbury -- Hutcheson -- Helvetius -- Hume -- Beccaria -- Godwin -- Bentham -- Mill -- Jevons -- Sidgwick -- Edgeworth -- Hare -- Rawls -- Harsanyi.

People who put the public good before their own self interest have been admired throughout history. But what is the public good? Sages and prophets who think they know better what is good for us than we know ourselves held sway on this subject for more than two thousand years. The world had to wait for the Enlightenment that burst upon the world in the eighteenth century for an account of the public good free from the prejudices of the privileged classes. Utilitarianism is our name for this new way of thinking about morality. Francis Hutcheson encapsulated its aims by inventing its catchphrase "The greatest happiness for the greatest number'' fifty years before Jeremy Bentham, to whom the slogan is usually attributed. But what is happiness? Why did Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill prefer to speak of utility? How did economists develop this notion? Does it really make sense to compare the utilities of different people? Bob may complain more than Alice in the dentist's chair, but is he really suffering more? Why should I put the sum of everybody's utility before my own utility? This short book asks how such questions arose from the social and political realities of the times in which the early utilitarians lived. Nobody need fear being crushed by heavy metaphysical reasoning or incomprehensible algebra when this story is told. This book argues that the answers to all the questions that the early utilitarians found so difficult are transparent when we stand upon their shoulders to look back upon their work. The problem for the early utilitarians was to free themselves from the prejudices of their time. The lesson for us is perhaps that we too need to free ourselves from the prejudices of our own time.

ISBN: 9783030745837$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-74583-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

191291
Utilitarianism.

LC Class. No.: B843

Dewey Class. No.: 144.6

Early utilitarianslives and ideals /
LDR:02836nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 609459
003 DE-He213
005 20210911131046.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 220222s2021 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030745837$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030745820$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-74583-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-74583-7
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a B843
072 7 $a KCZ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a BUS069000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a KCZ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 144.6 $2 23
090 $a B843 $b .B613 2021
100 1 $a Binmore, Ken. $3 860818
245 1 0 $a Early utilitarians $h [electronic resource] : $b lives and ideals / $c by Ken Binmore.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2021.
300 $a ix, 95 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Introduction -- Shaftesbury -- Hutcheson -- Helvetius -- Hume -- Beccaria -- Godwin -- Bentham -- Mill -- Jevons -- Sidgwick -- Edgeworth -- Hare -- Rawls -- Harsanyi.
520 $a People who put the public good before their own self interest have been admired throughout history. But what is the public good? Sages and prophets who think they know better what is good for us than we know ourselves held sway on this subject for more than two thousand years. The world had to wait for the Enlightenment that burst upon the world in the eighteenth century for an account of the public good free from the prejudices of the privileged classes. Utilitarianism is our name for this new way of thinking about morality. Francis Hutcheson encapsulated its aims by inventing its catchphrase "The greatest happiness for the greatest number'' fifty years before Jeremy Bentham, to whom the slogan is usually attributed. But what is happiness? Why did Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill prefer to speak of utility? How did economists develop this notion? Does it really make sense to compare the utilities of different people? Bob may complain more than Alice in the dentist's chair, but is he really suffering more? Why should I put the sum of everybody's utility before my own utility? This short book asks how such questions arose from the social and political realities of the times in which the early utilitarians lived. Nobody need fear being crushed by heavy metaphysical reasoning or incomprehensible algebra when this story is told. This book argues that the answers to all the questions that the early utilitarians found so difficult are transparent when we stand upon their shoulders to look back upon their work. The problem for the early utilitarians was to free themselves from the prejudices of their time. The lesson for us is perhaps that we too need to free ourselves from the prejudices of our own time.
650 0 $a Utilitarianism. $3 191291
650 1 4 $a History of Economic Thought/Methodology. $3 760025
650 2 4 $a Philosophy, general. $3 731263
650 2 4 $a Psychology, general. $3 275067
650 2 4 $a Behavioral/Experimental Economics. $3 737421
650 2 4 $a Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods. $3 731081
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74583-7
950 $a Economics and Finance (SpringerNature-41170)