國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

How philosophers arguean adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	How philosophers argueby Fernando Leal, Hubert Marraud.
Reminder of title:	an adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate /
Author:	Leal, Fernando.
other author:	Marraud, Hubert.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022.
Description:	xiii, 472 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Logic.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6
ISBN:	9783030853686$q(electronic bk.)

How philosophers arguean adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate /
Leal, Fernando.

How philosophers arguean adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate /[electronic resource] :by Fernando Leal, Hubert Marraud. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022. - xiii, 472 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Argumentation library,v. 412215-1907 ;. - Argumentation library ;v.21..

Preface -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. Argumentation Theories -- Part I: A P-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Fernando Leal -- Chapter 2. Description of the Method Followed -- Chapter 3. Analysis of Segment I: Start of the Debate -- Chapter 4. Analysis of Segment II: Discussion of Copleston's Metaphysical Argument -- Chapter 5. Analysis of Segment III: Discussion of Copleston's Religious Argument -- Chapter 6. Analysis of Segment IV: Discussion of Copleston's Moral Argument -- Chapter 7. Analysis of Segment V: Summing-Up of the Arguments -- Part II: An E-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Hubert Marraud -- Chapter 8. Argument Dialectic -- Chapter 9. Argumentation Structures and Operations -- Chapter 10. Counterarguments -- Chapter 11. Co-oriented Reasons and Modifiers -- Chapter 12. Intertwined Structures -- Chapter 13. An Argument-Dialectical Analysis of the Russell-Copleston Debate -- Chapter 14. An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration -- Appendix: Text of the Russell-Copleston Debate.

This volume presents a double argumentative analysis of the debate between Bertrand Russell and Frederick Copleston on the existence of God. It includes an introduction justifying the choice of text and describing the historical and philosophical background of the debate. It also provides a transcript of the debate, based in part on the original recording. The argumentative analyses occupy Parts I and II of the book. In Part I the argumentative process is analysed by means of the ideal model of critical discussion, the workhorse of pragma-dialectics. Part I shows how the two parties go through the four stages of a critical discussion. It highlights the questions raised over and beyond the presiding question of whether God exists and examines almost a hundred questions that are raised. Many are left in the air, whereas a few others give rise to sundry sub-discussions or meta-dialogues. In Part II the theoretical framework of argument dialectic is put to work: argument structures are identified by means of punctuation marks, argumentative connectors and operators, allowing to see the argumentative exchange as the collaborative construction of a macro-argument. Such a macro-argument is both a joint product of the arguers and a complex structure representing the dialectical relationships between the individual arguments combined in it. Finally, the complementarity of the two approaches is addressed. Thus the book can be described as an exercise in adversarial collaboration.

ISBN: 9783030853686$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

180785
Logic.

LC Class. No.: BC108

Dewey Class. No.: 160

How philosophers arguean adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate /
LDR:03575nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 623493
003 DE-He213
005 20220221071818.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 221209s2022 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030853686$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030853679$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-85368-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BC108
072 7 $a HPC $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI009000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDH $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 160 $2 23
090 $a BC108 $b .L435 2022
100 1 $a Leal, Fernando. $3 925720
245 1 0 $a How philosophers argue $h [electronic resource] : $b an adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate / $c by Fernando Leal, Hubert Marraud.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2022.
300 $a xiii, 472 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Argumentation library, $x 2215-1907 ; $v v. 41
505 0 $a Preface -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. Argumentation Theories -- Part I: A P-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Fernando Leal -- Chapter 2. Description of the Method Followed -- Chapter 3. Analysis of Segment I: Start of the Debate -- Chapter 4. Analysis of Segment II: Discussion of Copleston's Metaphysical Argument -- Chapter 5. Analysis of Segment III: Discussion of Copleston's Religious Argument -- Chapter 6. Analysis of Segment IV: Discussion of Copleston's Moral Argument -- Chapter 7. Analysis of Segment V: Summing-Up of the Arguments -- Part II: An E-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Hubert Marraud -- Chapter 8. Argument Dialectic -- Chapter 9. Argumentation Structures and Operations -- Chapter 10. Counterarguments -- Chapter 11. Co-oriented Reasons and Modifiers -- Chapter 12. Intertwined Structures -- Chapter 13. An Argument-Dialectical Analysis of the Russell-Copleston Debate -- Chapter 14. An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration -- Appendix: Text of the Russell-Copleston Debate.
520 $a This volume presents a double argumentative analysis of the debate between Bertrand Russell and Frederick Copleston on the existence of God. It includes an introduction justifying the choice of text and describing the historical and philosophical background of the debate. It also provides a transcript of the debate, based in part on the original recording. The argumentative analyses occupy Parts I and II of the book. In Part I the argumentative process is analysed by means of the ideal model of critical discussion, the workhorse of pragma-dialectics. Part I shows how the two parties go through the four stages of a critical discussion. It highlights the questions raised over and beyond the presiding question of whether God exists and examines almost a hundred questions that are raised. Many are left in the air, whereas a few others give rise to sundry sub-discussions or meta-dialogues. In Part II the theoretical framework of argument dialectic is put to work: argument structures are identified by means of punctuation marks, argumentative connectors and operators, allowing to see the argumentative exchange as the collaborative construction of a macro-argument. Such a macro-argument is both a joint product of the arguers and a complex structure representing the dialectical relationships between the individual arguments combined in it. Finally, the complementarity of the two approaches is addressed. Thus the book can be described as an exercise in adversarial collaboration.
650 0 $a Logic. $3 180785
650 0 $a Reasoning. $3 186192
650 1 4 $a History of Philosophy. $3 274764
700 1 $a Marraud, Hubert. $3 925721
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Argumentation library ; $v v.21. $3 558198
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)